ExiledAce Posted Sunday at 10:42 AM Report Share Posted Sunday at 10:42 AM Back in the 70s Speedway seemed to be covered quite well on TV and in print. Regular coverage on World of Sport, daily results/meeting reports and news in the papers and at least everyone seemed to know of the sport if not actually go. I seem to remember PCs world title win making the front page of the Daily Mirror. Even in to the mid 80’s Speedway seemed to do ok, Wiggy and Kenny Carter were never off Breakfast TV or so it seemed, ITV regularly showing Wc quails, even test matches but at least you could mention the sport to most people and not have them look at you like you were from outer space! So what went wrong, why did people stop going, why did the media lose interest? I’m as guilty as the next man, for various reasons I couldn’t go as much as I liked [and I used to go everywhere, believe me] then eventually stopped altogether. Planning on going to Plymouth this year, I have never fallen out of love with Speedway just drifted away. Followed it as much as I could online and on TV. Is the answer that simple, far too many people of my generation drifted away, and with it any media support? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IainB Posted yesterday at 01:28 PM Report Share Posted yesterday at 01:28 PM I don't think the explosion of TV channels has helped. Everything seems to have its own niche channel these days, BSN being speedway's example. Back in the day you just had 3 or 4 TV channels and if you were fortunate enough to be on one of them you were quids in. Then satellite TV came along and the whole entertainment industry was carved up into its different categories, and everybody now watches stuff in their own bubble. In the era of 3/4 channel TV if you were a "celebrity" you were a national celebrity, these days you could walk past most of the modern day "celebrities" in the street unaware as they're generally not known outside of their bubble. Add in the demise of the print media for anybody over 40 and it's really hard to get your message across without some kind of "on brand" message. Speedway with its very white, very male audience and participants will just get overlooked, having said that it does have the youth of the participants on its side that really could be exploited more. The old codgers in the crowd will not like crowds of hooded yoofs roaming the stadiums in gangs playing their awful music though 😂 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The White Knight Posted yesterday at 03:57 PM Report Share Posted yesterday at 03:57 PM 2 hours ago, IainB said: I don't think the explosion of TV channels has helped. Everything seems to have its own niche channel these days, BSN being speedway's example. Back in the day you just had 3 or 4 TV channels and if you were fortunate enough to be on one of them you were quids in. Then satellite TV came along and the whole entertainment industry was carved up into its different categories, and everybody now watches stuff in their own bubble. In the era of 3/4 channel TV if you were a "celebrity" you were a national celebrity, these days you could walk past most of the modern day "celebrities" in the street unaware as they're generally not known outside of their bubble. Add in the demise of the print media for anybody over 40 and it's really hard to get your message across without some kind of "on brand" message. Speedway with its very white, very male audience and participants will just get overlooked, having said that it does have the youth of the participants on its side that really could be exploited more. The old codgers in the crowd will not like crowds of hooded yoofs roaming the stadiums in gangs playing their awful music though 😂 Love it. 🤣🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebv Posted yesterday at 06:03 PM Report Share Posted yesterday at 06:03 PM On 3/9/2025 at 10:42 AM, ExiledAce said: Back in the 70s Speedway seemed to be covered quite well on TV and in print. Regular coverage on World of Sport, daily results/meeting reports and news in the papers and at least everyone seemed to know of the sport if not actually go. I seem to remember PCs world title win making the front page of the Daily Mirror. Even in to the mid 80’s Speedway seemed to do ok, Wiggy and Kenny Carter were never off Breakfast TV or so it seemed, ITV regularly showing Wc quails, even test matches but at least you could mention the sport to most people and not have them look at you like you were from outer space! So what went wrong, why did people stop going, why did the media lose interest? I’m as guilty as the next man, for various reasons I couldn’t go as much as I liked [and I used to go everywhere, believe me] then eventually stopped altogether. Planning on going to Plymouth this year, I have never fallen out of love with Speedway just drifted away. Followed it as much as I could online and on TV. Is the answer that simple, far too many people of my generation drifted away, and with it any media support? The domestic competition's definitely piggy backed off the very regular success at international level.. Watching PC thrill the nation on a Saturday afternoon riding for England, certainly aided crowd numbers for league speedway across the country... And then the UK decided to train up riders from the USA, Denmark and "everywhere else" instead of developing riders to replace PC, Louis, Simmons, Jessup etc etc etc.. Meaning less UK riders to watch, and inevitably, less success, as the USA and Denmark in particular cleaned up... And TV then decided to give it a wide swerve as watching non UK riders win pretty much every major honour, year in year out, became something viewers decided wasn't worth doing.. Nowadays barely 20,000 will attend Speedway every week... Mainstream media wouldn't be interested in such a tiny sport... Particularly with it's weather impact issues and, domestically, its ludicrous operating model... The GP's maybe have a chance of MSM coverage now Lambert and Bewley are challenging? But the organisers seem happy with Satellite and running behind pay walls... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGT Posted 9 hours ago Report Share Posted 9 hours ago 15 hours ago, mikebv said: The domestic competition's definitely piggy backed off the very regular success at international level.. Watching PC thrill the nation on a Saturday afternoon riding for England, certainly aided crowd numbers for league speedway across the country... And then the UK decided to train up riders from the USA, Denmark and "everywhere else" instead of developing riders to replace PC, Louis, Simmons, Jessup etc etc etc.. Meaning less UK riders to watch, and inevitably, less success, as the USA and Denmark in particular cleaned up... And TV then decided to give it a wide swerve as watching non UK riders win pretty much every major honour, year in year out, became something viewers decided wasn't worth doing.. Nowadays barely 20,000 will attend Speedway every week... Mainstream media wouldn't be interested in such a tiny sport... Particularly with it's weather impact issues and, domestically, its ludicrous operating model... The GP's maybe have a chance of MSM coverage now Lambert and Bewley are challenging? But the organisers seem happy with Satellite and running behind pay walls... All the other main FIM world championships are behind paywalls and have been for years. No need for speedway to be any different really. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petecc Posted 8 hours ago Report Share Posted 8 hours ago 20 hours ago, IainB said: I don't think the explosion of TV channels has helped. Everything seems to have its own niche channel these days, BSN being speedway's example. Back in the day you just had 3 or 4 TV channels and if you were fortunate enough to be on one of them you were quids in. Then satellite TV came along and the whole entertainment industry was carved up into its different categories, and everybody now watches stuff in their own bubble. In the era of 3/4 channel TV if you were a "celebrity" you were a national celebrity, these days you could walk past most of the modern day "celebrities" in the street unaware as they're generally not known outside of their bubble. Add in the demise of the print media for anybody over 40 and it's really hard to get your message across without some kind of "on brand" message. Speedway with its very white, very male audience and participants will just get overlooked, having said that it does have the youth of the participants on its side that really could be exploited more. The old codgers in the crowd will not like crowds of hooded yoofs roaming the stadiums in gangs playing their awful music though 😂 Celebrities, everyone can be famous for 15 minutes. I just didn't expect it to be the same 15 minutes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IainB Posted 8 hours ago Report Share Posted 8 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Petecc said: Celebrities, everyone can be famous for 15 minutes. I just didn't expect it to be the same 15 minutes. 15 minutes... spread over the course of 2 hours with regular breaks for tractor racing 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.