Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Team Building, and why 2 Big Hitters per team are required.


Recommended Posts

Sheffield  3   J Holder, C Holder &  T Woffinden    

Belle Vue  2.  B Kurtz & D Bewley

Leicester. 2.   M Fricke  &  S Masters.

Ipswich.  2.  J Doyle   &  E Sayfutinov.

 

 

Oxford.  2   R Tungate  &   M Jankowski.

all 4 teams finished in the top four, and to me it was obvious they would.  Oxford never really got going with Jankowski only coming good at the end when it was too late. Leaving Kings Lynn and Birmingham the bottom 2 clubs who decided half way through the season to bring in one big hitter which was not enough and far too late.

building a balanced side throughout goes to prove that doing so will lose you matches when you hit heat 13  & 15. coming up to the big hitters. 
 
If you have 1 decent second string and 1 decent reserve that’s all you need to back the big boys up.Heat advantages would be fruitful and win you matches.

What’s your thoughts ?

 

Edited by Youhave2minutes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, KIRKYLANE said:

Having two big hitters in the Premier league requires a large part of your budget..which some teams may not be able to afford.

The hardest part is to set a suitable team limit that allows teams of reasonable equality.

Can’t afford then drop down a division. Not fair to the fans of those clubs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 1964 there only seven teams in the National league ( top league )….. only 2 teams are still going now.

The following year the NL and the provincial league combined with 17 teams forming the British League… home and away once with a Ko cuo

A vital step made whereby the sport revived itself

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Youhave2minutes said:

Sheffield  3   J Holder, C Holder &  T Woffinden    

Belle Vue  2.  B Kurtz & D Bewley

Leicester. 2.   M Fricke  &  S Masters.

Ipswich.  2.  J Doyle   &  E Sayfutinov.

 

 

Oxford.  2   R Tungate  &   M Jankowski.

all 4 teams finished in the top four, and to me it was obvious they would.  Oxford never really got going with Jankowski only coming good at the end when it was too late. Leaving Kings Lynn and Birmingham the bottom 2 clubs who decided half way through the season to bring in one big hitter which was not enough and far too late.

building a balanced side throughout goes to prove that doing so will lose you matches when you hit heat 13  & 15. coming up to the big hitters. 
 
If you have 1 decent second string and 1 decent reserve that’s all you need to back the big boys up.Heat advantages would be fruitful and win you matches.

What’s your thoughts ?

 

it's a no brainer isn't it.  The top two get an extra ride (nominated heat 15, plus a potential TR) and they're in all bar 6 of the 15 heats so you need two top riders otherwise you concede 8 points across heat 13 and 15 and can't get a heat advantage in 7 of the other heats. arguably you could go for strength in depth to secure an 8 point advantage across heats 2 and 8 but as soon as you have a 'rising star' restriction or whatever it's been over the years, you nullify the strength in depth option.

I've said for years, if you restrict the reserves you got to restrict the top two, i.e. only one rider averaging over 8 or 9 whatever top men average these days. It makes complete financial sense as well, as demand outweighs supply but clubs that can afford two of them will never vote for it as it's a huge advantage.

The heat format is so regulated these days there's basically no point in turning up if you've not got two top riders. Especially when you can have guest riders for missing top riders so there's no jeopardy in putting all your eggs in the top two basket. Although Ipswich would argue that point as they'd have walked the title this season if they'd been able to replace Doyle and Sayfutdinov satisfactorily.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2024 at 4:30 PM, KIRKYLANE said:

In 1964 there only seven teams in the National league ( top league )….. only 2 teams are still going now.

The following year the NL and the provincial league combined with 17 teams forming the British League… home and away once with a Ko cuo

A vital step made whereby the sport revived itself

How would that approach work today when half of the riders in each of the top two divisions are double uppers? Where will all the additional riders come from?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Teromaafan said:

How would that approach work today when half of the riders in each of the top two divisions are double uppers? Where will all the additional riders come from?

it simply would not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
23 hours ago, Youhave2minutes said:

But you can never hold a bull down😂

Do you mean 'Bulls***ter??? 🙄

Genuine question.

Edited by The White Knight
Spelling etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy