Racin Jason 72 Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, ouch said: You could make up an alternative narrative for all The Aces but the fact of the matter is someone HAD to go, even including Tate’s injury replacement the fabulous Antti. That’s not debatable. Like I say Ben ticked all the boxes unfortunately but whoever it was we could be unfairly berated for dropping a rider - which we had to do to conform to the rules. Things will be a clearer when the team is announced as why it was Ben. Louis mentioned Keynan wanted to stay as he had unfinished business and that Louis had reasons for getting rid of Keynan. Keynan also had reasons that could affect whether he re-signed or not. Probably 50/50 though as Louis stated it was mostly Kenyan, so 51/49. His sacking was unnecessary, a choice not available to The Aces, again not debatable. Keynan priced himself out of a return. He wasn’t sacked as like all riders they are out of contract from November onwards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ouch Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Racin Jason 72 said: Keynan priced himself out of a return. He wasn’t sacked as like all riders they are out of contract from November onwards. Fair play to Ipswich going for the cheaper option and a good one at that in Tom. Belts always need tightening in the UK speedway world. The out of contract thing is just semantics to me. For the 50+ years I’ve been watching speedway all teams generally stick with their team or at least the core, especially the successful ones. There’s an implied “as you were” despite the self employed status of riders. That’s my opinion anyway, could be wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesB Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 43 minutes ago, ouch said: Fair play to Ipswich going for the cheaper option and a good one at that in Tom. Belts always need tightening in the UK speedway world. The out of contract thing is just semantics to me. For the 50+ years I’ve been watching speedway all teams generally stick with their team or at least the core, especially the successful ones. There’s an implied “as you were” despite the self employed status of riders. That’s my opinion anyway, could be wrong. OK, it’s a cold and boring Friday morning so I’ll take the bait…. 1. Louis has decided to strengthen the team by bringing in Brennan. 2. Therefore, in the same way as Belle Vue ‘somebody has to go’ to accommodate that strengthening. 3. Two clubs offered Rew a significant uptick on his points money. He was ‘keen to stay’ but expected Louis to move towards his new offered points money. 4. Any business when hiring an individual weighs up cost v benefit i.e. value for money and it would appear that in this case Louis decided that did not stack up for him as the owner of the business. 5. I have no issue with Rew wanting to increase his earnings and another team being willing to pay accordingly, that’s called Capitalism. I wish Rew all the best and hope that we see him back as a Witch at some point in the future. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ouch Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 37 minutes ago, JamesB said: OK, it’s a cold and boring Friday morning so I’ll take the bait…. 1. Louis has decided to strengthen the team by bringing in Brennan. 2. Therefore, in the same way as Belle Vue ‘somebody has to go’ to accommodate that strengthening. 3. Two clubs offered Rew a significant uptick on his points money. He was ‘keen to stay’ but expected Louis to move towards his new offered points money. 4. Any business when hiring an individual weighs up cost v benefit i.e. value for money and it would appear that in this case Louis decided that did not stack up for him as the owner of the business. 5. I have no issue with Rew wanting to increase his earnings and another team being willing to pay accordingly, that’s called Capitalism. I wish Rew all the best and hope that we see him back as a Witch at some point in the future. Great post and a clear description of the situation. The only not the same is point 2 where Ipswich by choice strengthened so Keynan had to go whereas Belle Vue had to de strengthen and not by choice (but due to the rules) a rider had to go. If you are a witch, I’d be interested to know if you think Keynan was dropped due to money or due to the signing of Tom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesB Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 9 minutes ago, ouch said: Great post and a clear description of the situation. The only not the same is point 2 where Ipswich by choice strengthened so Keynan had to go whereas Belle Vue had to de strengthen and not by choice (but due to the rules) a rider had to go. If you are a witch, I’d be interested to know if you think Keynan was dropped due to money or due to the signing of Tom. Once the decision was taken to strengthen with Brennan, then one of the 2024 cohort had to move on. I have been told and I have no certainty whether it is true or not that the original plan was for one of the other riders to move on, however the situation with Rew changed the plan. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP78 Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago You've got to believe that Rew would've been retained if his demands were inline with what management wanted to pay. Ipswich persevered with him during his first season where he was below his 4 point assessed average and started to reap the rewards last year... So would surely have been keen to sign him up for 2025 when he will likely continue his progression. On that basis, I would guess that Ellis or King were lined up to make way - the latter has hinted at that with his recent comments. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ouch Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 30 minutes ago, MP78 said: You've got to believe that Rew would've been retained if his demands were inline with what management wanted to pay. Ipswich persevered with him during his first season where he was below his 4 point assessed average and started to reap the rewards last year... So would surely have been keen to sign him up for 2025 when he will likely continue his progression. On that basis, I would guess that Ellis or King were lined up to make way - the latter has hinted at that with his recent comments. He came in on a 5.00 so I can see the witches frustration with him ending his second season of (pretty much) riding at reserve and only showing 0.67 increase on that starting average. Card was marked imo. https://britishspeedway.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/p23_issue_1.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue witch Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago Money as I believe Ellis would've been dropped if Rew didn't ask for so much. Been told he was paid enough this season gone but performed at reserve most he season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesB Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 32 minutes ago, blue witch said: Money as I believe Ellis would've been dropped if Rew didn't ask for so much. Been told he was paid enough this season gone but performed at reserve most he season. I heard the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.