szkocjasid Posted December 11 Report Share Posted December 11 I don't think Kildemand is a bad signing on a 6.00 average, he could reach that. But I thought he was an awesome signing at first when I was led to believe it was 4.0/4.5. I certainly don't understand why they would drop Harris for Kildemand though. I guess we'll never know if they had other answers that fell through & Kildemand was a back up option (something Harris wouldn't agree to be). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hilly Posted December 11 Report Share Posted December 11 1 hour ago, szkocjasid said: I don't think Kildemand is a bad signing on a 6.00 average, he could reach that. But I thought he was an awesome signing at first when I was led to believe it was 4.0/4.5. I certainly don't understand why they would drop Harris for Kildemand though. I guess we'll never know if they had other answers that fell through & Kildemand was a back up option (something Harris wouldn't agree to be). Don't think Harris was ever in the team (think Harris/Boughen/Glasgow) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebv Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 12 hours ago, Falcon1983 said: Its not always about building to the limit though, more about getting the riders that you want in your 1-7 It's also sometimes about finding yourselves in a corner and then cobbling together seven riders who can be bothered to ride over here, after other teams have locked and loads their "top two" well before you have.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiveusaB Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 This time last season everyone at Oxford filled with optimism....stadium/support/money etc etc etc.... This season...looking sh#te....someone needs to take a closer look at the Team manager!? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandyLaner Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 Easy to say but I’d much rather one competitive side than two non-competitive sides, which is exactly what the Spires and Cheetahs look like this year with Scotty knackered. Chargers on Sundays it is! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manifesto Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 Is the Oxford team that bad? It’s a similar match up to Kings Lynns in my opinion. Everyone fancying them for play offs although I can’t see anybody matching up to Ipswich, Sheffield and Bv. The last rider needs to be a solid rider who can hit their average home and away and they should be competitive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnieg Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 7 minutes ago, GiveusaB said: This time last season everyone at Oxford filled with optimism....stadium/support/money etc etc etc.... This season...looking sh#te....someone needs to take a closer look at the Team manager!? That's a rewriting of history. There was considerable doubt about the wisdom of running three teams this time last year. However I am disappointed that with more time to plan there is not greater commonality between the teams. As for the team manager sometimes a discrete silence is the best response. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP78 Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 15 hours ago, Speedball said: Think Oxford got stitched when Musielak got tempted by Birmingham. Been on the back foot team building wise since then. I agree - an opportunity missed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarBoy Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 3 hours ago, Manifesto said: Is the Oxford team that bad? It’s a similar match up to Kings Lynns in my opinion. Everyone fancying them for play offs although I can’t see anybody matching up to Ipswich, Sheffield and Bv. The last rider needs to be a solid rider who can hit their average home and away and they should be competitive Stars Spires 1. Lawson 1. Tungate (tick) 2. Kvech (tick) 2. Riss 3. Iversen (tick) 3. Wright 4. Klindt (tick) 4. Klidemand 5. Cook 5. Janowski (tick) 6. Harris (tick) 6. ? 7. Boughen (tick) 7. Killeen Thats how I break it down when doing a comparison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiveusaB Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 (edited) 13 minutes ago, StarBoy said: Stars Spires 1. Lawson 1. Tungate (tick) 2. Kvech (tick) 2. Riss 3. Iversen (tick) 3. Wright 4. Klindt (tick) 4. Klidemand 5. Cook 5. Janowski (tick) 6. Harris (tick) 6. ? 7. Boughen (tick) 7. Killeen Thats how I break it down when doing a comparison. If you swap the no.1 and 2's for both sides....then Stars would have 6 ticks! Edited December 12 by GiveusaB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sings4Speedway Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 On 12/11/2024 at 11:30 AM, SPEEDY69 said: It always used to be a 1.5 multiplier, guess that must have changed then. Wasn't the multiplier going to increase by 0.1 every season until it reached 2 so that doubling up would be reduced 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazzac Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 10 minutes ago, Sings4Speedway said: Wasn't the multiplier going to increase by 0.1 every season until it reached 2 so that doubling up would be reduced 🤣 Or maybe eventually brought the mathematical equation into the range of the powers that be....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnieg Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 15 minutes ago, gazzac said: Or maybe eventually brought the mathematical equation into the range of the powers that be....... My long campaign to persuade a member of the SCB that linear regression should be used never really gained much momentum. 🫢 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Connor Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 I don't think Oxford look terrible at all. Outside of Ipswich and Sheffield there's not much in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Jacobs Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 7 hours ago, GiveusaB said: If you swap the no.1 and 2's for both sides....then Stars would have 6 ticks! Or ... if you swap 3, 4, and 5 for each side, then the Spires would have all the ticks ... rocket science Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 8 hours ago, StarBoy said: Stars Spires 1. Lawson 1. Tungate (tick) 2. Kvech (tick) 2. Riss 3. Iversen (tick) 3. Wright 4. Klindt (tick) 4. Klidemand 5. Cook 5. Janowski (tick) 6. Harris (tick) 6. ? 7. Boughen (tick) 7. Killeen Thats how I break it down when doing a comparison. They have 7.4 left for last rider so Riss will probably be at reserve although you would fancy Harris in a match up against anyone while he stays at reserve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PTW Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 The rumour I heard was Andreas Lyager I’d assume his average would be 6.00 or 6.50 meaning nearly a point short of the limit,Deja vu from last year lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PTW Posted December 12 Report Share Posted December 12 12 hours ago, StarBoy said: Stars Spires 1. Lawson 1. Tungate (tick) 2. Kvech (tick) 2. Riss 3. Iversen (tick) 3. Wright 4. Klindt (tick) 4. Klidemand 5. Cook 5. Janowski (tick) 6. Harris (tick) 6. ? 7. Boughen (tick) 7. Killeen Thats how I break it down when doing a comparison. I thought Cook was at no1 Lawson reduction in average takes him from top rider to below Cook. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col Posted December 13 Report Share Posted December 13 16 hours ago, Manifesto said: Is the Oxford team that bad? It’s a similar match up to Kings Lynns in my opinion. Spires have more chance of being competitive in heats 13 & 15 than Stars do. One good T/S works against teams that are built on overall strength. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaddlebowRoad Posted December 13 Report Share Posted December 13 9 hours ago, Col said: Spires have more chance of being competitive in heats 13 & 15 than Stars do. One good T/S works against teams that are built on overall strength. while i take your point id take my chances with any two of lynns top six against tungate & magic home or away Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.