Cross Roads Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 Just watched back the coverage from last night as was there. Being a lions fan chuffed to bits we progress to the final. Agree there was some poor ref decisions and I congratulate the witches on a tough season considering the injury’s. Must say the Eurosport team need to rem x2 teams in the meeting maybe just me but little engagement with the lions all lpswich interviews and comments for majority of the time…. one final point please please please Leicester management get some lights on the starting gate above the advertising banner directly onto the gates unless on start line cannot see the riders. 8 lights 2 each gate… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Jacobs Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 23 minutes ago, Cross Roads said: Just watched back the coverage from last night as was there. Being a lions fan chuffed to bits we progress to the final. Agree there was some poor ref decisions and I congratulate the witches on a tough season considering the injury’s. Must say the Eurosport team need to rem x2 teams in the meeting maybe just me but little engagement with the lions all lpswich interviews and comments for majority of the time…. one final point please please please Leicester management get some lights on the starting gate above the advertising banner directly onto the gates unless on start line cannot see the riders. 8 lights 2 each gate… Contact them directly with that suggestion. Also, please ask them to sort out the drainage - it's a purpose built track, so should be able to cope with downpours, rather than lose the inside line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Jacobs Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 7 hours ago, BryanUgest said: No mention of Kingy sliding off on his own or Rew not using his noddle twice I see. Because that's speedway. Hawkins acknowledged that they threw points away. Turnbull's awful refereeing made a huge difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Jacobs Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 7 hours ago, Hamish McRaker said: Fricke lost control because he received a big lateral shove from the rider in gate one as they were about to enter bend one. This probably occurred because all four riders by this stage were aiming for more or less the same piece of track. Therefore what happened subsequently could not have been prevented by him and the decision to re-start the heat with all riders was correct. Incorrect. It's clear form the Discovery+ coverage that Kvech didn't move, and Fricke was lifting before they go to the first turn. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambo95 Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 Emil with 6 points from 6 rides tonight. Obviously not fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Jacobs Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 21 hours ago, 40-38 said: I'm amazed how many people have been insinuating it's somehow Leicester's fault the ref is crap. We gave Ipswich more than enough chances over 2 legs to put us away, we're probably the most generous side in the play offs! I think it's clear that Ipswich generously gave away points to Leicester, affording the Lions several chances to win at a canter ... yet the Witches still managed to crawl to a last heat decider despite the referee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tellboy Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 8 hours ago, 1 valve said: The referee didn't steel the show. The riders made it. Shame on a promoter using such wording and showing a complete lack of professionalism. The ref most definitely did steel the show,with her complete lack of professionalism. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 7 hours ago, SUPERACE said: Reading the wording on Rising Stars you could be right as its around the 2024 season and doesn't cover past seasons. Common sense would mean a rider who has progressed out of the RS isn't allowed to drop back in it. My personal opinion is all riders 21 and under should be able to be a rising star no matter their average, and up to and including 23 on an average below 4 (moving our of the scheme for good once this average is achieved). Happy enough with your U21 suggestion, question - if Lambert & Bewley were "rising stars" at 20 years old, would you have them riding at reserve or on the heat leader positions their averages dictated? Re, riders not being allowed to return to the RS scheme once they've "graduated" if a rider gets 3 3.90 ave one season, 3.80 the next, 3.70 after that, do they really deserve to be a "rising star" over someone who averaged 3.98 then 4.02, then 3.98 again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcatdiary Posted September 14 Report Share Posted September 14 12 hours ago, Roger Jacobs said: Because that's speedway. Hawkins acknowledged that they threw points away. Turnbull's awful refereeing made a huge difference. Falls show the story somewhat as well Ipswich 11 and Leicester 1, and importantly Ipswich twice when on 5-1’s. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skodaman Posted September 14 Report Share Posted September 14 15 hours ago, Roger Jacobs said: Contact them directly with that suggestion. Also, please ask them to sort out the drainage - it's a purpose built track, so should be able to cope with downpours, rather than lose the inside line. It rained for most of the afternoon and not just for the hour before the meeting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamish McRaker Posted September 14 Report Share Posted September 14 15 hours ago, Roger Jacobs said: Incorrect. It's clear form the Discovery+ coverage that Kvech didn't move, and Fricke was lifting before they go to the first turn. No problem with Kvech there, that's racing. When 4 riders are going for a narrow funnel, any contact is going to at least double the risk of consequences beyond the control of the riders. Sensible decision in that case to do it again with all 4, just as it should have been with heat 3 where Rew was unjustly excluded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieb1 Posted September 14 Report Share Posted September 14 why are people still moaning on this thread wether it be ipswich or leicester ? this is IPSWICH V LEICESTER NOT LEICESTER V IPSWICH ? ITS THE WRONG THREASD GET OVER IT THE LOT OF YOU ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTFC LION Posted September 14 Report Share Posted September 14 On 9/13/2024 at 2:59 PM, 1 valve said: Are Dan & Joe both Leicester assets? Yes. On 9/13/2024 at 2:59 PM, 1 valve said: Are Dan & Joe both Leicester assets? Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambo95 Posted September 14 Report Share Posted September 14 3 hours ago, davieb1 said: why are people still moaning on this thread wether it be ipswich or leicester ? this is IPSWICH V LEICESTER NOT LEICESTER V IPSWICH ? ITS THE WRONG THREASD GET OVER IT THE LOT OF YOU ? Can you point me in the direction of the Leicester v Ipswich thread? Haven't seen one. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted September 14 Report Share Posted September 14 I just wonder how ipswich would have faired against Sheffield, the team they should have been up against 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin king junior Posted September 14 Report Share Posted September 14 37 minutes ago, Baldyman said: I just wonder how ipswich would have faired against Sheffield, the team they should have been up against Probably same outcome. Probably more bellyaching about the result. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShanoXtra Posted September 15 Author Report Share Posted September 15 Today I got a reply from Jim: Dear Sir. Thank you for your email, the comments of which are noted. It would be inappropriate of me as the Independent Chairman of the SCB to make any comment. Thank you for supporting our great sport and that you continue to do so. Yours in sport. Jim Lawrence SCB Chairman 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted September 15 Report Share Posted September 15 1 hour ago, ShanoXtra said: Today I got a reply from Jim: Dear Sir. Thank you for your email, the comments of which are noted. It would be inappropriate of me as the Independent Chairman of the SCB to make any comment. Thank you for supporting our great sport and that you continue to do so. Yours in sport. Jim Lawrence SCB Chairman Translation.... Pay up ,sit down ,shut up! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArthurRudge Posted September 15 Report Share Posted September 15 1 hour ago, ShanoXtra said: Today I got a reply from Jim: Dear Sir. Thank you for your email, the comments of which are noted. It would be inappropriate of me as the Independent Chairman of the SCB to make any comment. Thank you for supporting our great sport and that you continue to do so. Yours in sport. Jim Lawrence SCB Chairman How pathetic 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pauliejaz Posted September 15 Report Share Posted September 15 2 hours ago, ShanoXtra said: Today I got a reply from Jim: Dear Sir. Thank you for your email, the comments of which are noted. It would be inappropriate of me as the Independent Chairman of the SCB to make any comment. Thank you for supporting our great sport and that you continue to do so. Yours in sport. Jim Lawrence SCB Chairman Surely it's absolutely appropriate for him to comment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.