Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

2025 Team Predictions


Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, SteelShoe said:

Wouldn't be surprised. If Dan wants to continue to improve he probably needs to ride somewhere other than Belle Vue 

Away from Belle Vue it would be essential for him to improve his gating and thus make things easier for him, boring for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sheffield - Woffy, Rowe, C Holder, Picko, J Holder, Gilkes, Flint

Aces - Kurtz, Blodorn , Lidsey, ? , Bewley, Tate? , Mulford

Ipswich - Doyle, Brennan, Ellis, Rew, Emil, Thompson,  Jenkins

Lions - Fricke, Howarth, Masters, Becker, Douglas, C Cook, Hagon

Oxford - Tungate, Riss, Wright,  ? , Janowski, ?, Kileen

Kings Lynn - Lawson, B Cook, Kvech, Klindt, Iversen, Harris, Boughon

Birmingham - King, Z Cook, Worrall, Lampart, ? , ? Edwards

Just based on rumours and guess work. 

Edited by FishersGate
Spelling
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FishersGate said:

Sheffield - Woffy, Rowe, C Holder, Picko, J Holder, Gilkes, Flint

Aces - Kurtz, Blodorn , Lidsey, ? , Bewley, Tate? , Mulford

Ipswich - Doyle, Brennan, Ellis, Rew, Emil, Thompson,  Jenkins

Lions - Fricke, Howarth, Masters, Becker, Douglas, C Cook, Hagon

Oxford - Tungate, Riss, Wright,  ? , Janowski, ?, Kileen

Kings Lynn - Lawson, B Cook, Kvech, Klindt, Iversen, Harris, Boughon

Birmingham - King, Z Cook, Worrall, Lampart, ? , ? Edwards

Just based on rumours and guess work. 

I'd put Rew at Belle Vue and King in at Ipswich from what I've heard.
.
Can only think Brum will need to go for riders like Zagar, Bjerre etc if they can't get Musielak. Either that or pull a rabbit out of a hat somewhere (which will probably mean paying silly money).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Speedball said:

I'd put Rew at Belle Vue and King in at Ipswich from what I've heard.
.
Can only think Brum will need to go for riders like Zagar, Bjerre etc if they can't get Musielak. Either that or pull a rabbit out of a hat somewhere (which will probably mean paying silly money).

Both at Ipswich. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FishersGate said:

Sheffield - Woffy, Rowe, C Holder, Picko, J Holder, Gilkes, Flint

Aces - Kurtz, Blodorn , Lidsey, ? , Bewley, Tate? , Mulford

Ipswich - Doyle, Brennan, Ellis, Rew, Emil, Thompson,  Jenkins

Lions - Fricke, Howarth, Masters, Becker, Douglas, C Cook, Hagon

Oxford - Tungate, Riss, Wright,  ? , Janowski, ?, Kileen

Kings Lynn - Lawson, B Cook, Kvech, Klindt, Iversen, Harris, Boughon

Birmingham - King, Z Cook, Worrall, Lampart, ? , ? Edwards

Just based on rumours and guess work. 

lawsons brit reduction would put cook at 1 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, cowboy cookie returns? said:

Hopefully not King, the guys needs to move on. 

Don’t think it matters a great deal and there’s been nothing between them this season. 
 

Ellis 19 meetings GSA 5.90

King 17 meetings GSA 6.15

When you factor in that King rode the last third of the season struggling with his broken hand which saw him reject guest bookings and saw his average drop, but still finished with a slightly higher season average, is keeping Ellis over King wise? 
 

Appreciate some feel it just needs a parting of the ways, but one has to go to make room for Brennan and I don’t think it makes a huge difference scoring wise. Both would provide very similar scoring over the season for me. I think both have scope to improve their current averages, King’s with the caveat though of sorting his problematic hand injury. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Arch Stanton said:

Don’t think it matters a great deal and there’s been nothing between them this season. 
 

Ellis 19 meetings GSA 5.90

King 17 meetings GSA 6.15

When you factor in that King rode the last third of the season struggling with his broken hand which saw him reject guest bookings and saw his average drop, but still finished with a slightly higher season average, is keeping Ellis over King wise? 
 

Appreciate some feel it just needs a parting of the ways, but one has to go to make room for Brennan and I don’t think it makes a huge difference scoring wise. Both would provide very similar scoring over the season for me. I think both have scope to improve their current averages, King’s with the caveat though of sorting his problematic hand injury. 

Shows the strength of the Ipswich team really that in an ideal world, Rew will continue his progression next year in to a bona fide heatleader, meaning either Ellis or King will be the 5th strongest member of the side behind Doyle, Emil, Brennan and Rew. That’s potent. Good reserve pairing also, Jenkins one of the stronger rising Stars and Dan on a 25% reduction and in a reserve berth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Arch Stanton said:

Don’t think it matters a great deal and there’s been nothing between them this season. 
 

Ellis 19 meetings GSA 5.90

King 17 meetings GSA 6.15

When you factor in that King rode the last third of the season struggling with his broken hand which saw him reject guest bookings and saw his average drop, but still finished with a slightly higher season average, is keeping Ellis over King wise? 
 

Appreciate some feel it just needs a parting of the ways, but one has to go to make room for Brennan and I don’t think it makes a huge difference scoring wise. Both would provide very similar scoring over the season for me. I think both have scope to improve their current averages, King’s with the caveat though of sorting his problematic hand injury. 

I’m one of the ones who thinks that there needs to be a parting of ways for many reasons, I’ve thought that for the last 2 seasons. 

While I agree there isn’t much between King & Ellis I’d still have Ellis. 
 

The biggest issue with King staying is that he’d be skipper again & he isn’t skipper material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, RS50 said:

Thought the Brit reduction was just for team building, and did not apply to positions in the team.

Anyone confirm?

The 25% reduction for rising stars is only for team building purposes,that's if they drop being a rising star obviously.The 2.5% reduction for the Brits gives them a new starting average basically,so if that takes Lawson under Cook then Cook wll be no1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tellboy said:

The 25% reduction for rising stars is only for team building purposes,that's if they drop being a rising star obviously.The 2.5% reduction for the Brits gives them a new starting average basically,so if that takes Lawson under Cook then Cook wll be no1.

A rider's 2025 starting average is their actual average achieved in 2024. The 2.5% is just for team building!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, RS50 said:

Thought the Brit reduction was just for team building, and did not apply to positions in the team.

Anyone confirm?

 

8 hours ago, tellboy said:

The 25% reduction for rising stars is only for team building purposes,that's if they drop being a rising star obviously.The 2.5% reduction for the Brits gives them a new starting average basically,so if that takes Lawson under Cook then Cook wll be no1.

 

6 hours ago, Gambo said:

A rider's 2025 starting average is their actual average achieved in 2024. The 2.5% is just for team building!

Team building averages & a riders starting average are the same thing. I constantly said Brennan would start at reserve when he had his 25% reduction, only for so many people tell me I was wrong. But I was correct & he started at reserve.

This year won't effect Dan or Anders as they'd be in the same position regardless of average used.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy