Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Workington 2025


Recommended Posts

On 12/24/2024 at 12:32 PM, Woke23 said:

This forum us a brilliant forum getting ruined by one or two muppets unfortunately. Try and have a discussion and get immature responses.

Cookie is the better rider but you never know if he's going to turn up or not. However, same can be said about batch. Good rider, not as good as Cookie, but has previous rep of spitting his dummy. Infact I'm sure he done it on occasions last season. I think it was oxford where he was pulling wheelies across the finishing line when we were getting battered and he was in third.

Year before when he was at Birmingham in the pairs on a soaking wet race track

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/24/2024 at 10:30 AM, Midget said:

There is no doubt that cook would of been the better number 1, anyone who has any knowledge of speedway will tell you that. 

I think we could struggle in in heats 13 and 15 next year, especially away from home. 

Workington's loss is certainly berwicks gain.

 

1 hour ago, wtf said:

If that's the case and it's so obvious, it makes you wonder why the promotion chose one over the other? 

Probably because they wanted to get stronger in heats 2,8,12,&14?

As much as I want Cook as part of a strong top 4, I would not have let go of Zischke or Vuolas, so could've ended up with a team like:

Troy Batchelor 8.46
Craig Cook 8.42
Tate Zischke 6.96
Annti Vuolas 6.40
Vinnie Foord 3.90
Jack Smith 3.64
Sam McGurk 2.00
Total 39.78
 
So would Cook / Smith / McGurk score more than Bowes / Etheridge / Hook?
 
I definitely wouldn't want a team with Foord starting in the top 5, I would not drop Zischke or Vuolas under any circumstances, so to create the strongest Workington team, it means either Cook or Batchelor had to go!
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At times last year batch was better than cook and 

At times cook was outstanding and batch not so good 

Personally don't think there's much in it 

On track 

Maybe batch is lot cheaper than cookie and that had a part to play in it 

Dont think the teams that bad to be honest 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anybody thought that Craig might just be a expensive rider who like people are saying let the team down. I know if he rode against us at Redcar Workington would have won. 

May be that made Workington chose Batchelor instead of Craig ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SCS said:

Has anybody thought that Craig might just be a expensive rider who like people are saying let the team down. I know if he rode against us at Redcar Workington would have won. 

May be that made Workington chose Batchelor instead of Craig ?

Not really a fan of cookie but maybe he didn't turn up because of monies owed to him by Workington, difficult to be motivated when not being paid on time. Two sides to every coin!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lewy said:

Not really a fan of cookie but maybe he didn't turn up because of monies owed to him by Workington, difficult to be motivated when not being paid on time. Two sides to every coin!

Same old Lewy. Is this the same unsubstantiated claim you have already made? Remember glass houses and stones don't mix. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, magnus said:

Same old Lewy. Is this the same unsubstantiated claim you have already made? Remember glass houses and stones don't mix. 

Lewy seems to know a lot about other tracks, bit says very little about Plymouth these day 😛

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, wtf said:

If that's the case and it's so obvious, it makes you wonder why the promotion chose one over the other? 

Maybe Troy is easier to work with ? Or maybe last season it was the reserves who didn’t get enough points so the promotion have changed the balance of the team. 
tate and antti should improve further to cover the loss of cookie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Neila said:

Lewy seems to know a lot about other tracks, bit says very little about Plymouth these day 😛

any comments about Plymouth will be in the waste department of this form  .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it a coincidence that for three years in a row, Craig has been “let go” by his previous teams? And, regardless of press releases, always for the same reason - unreliability?

Was there not a suggestion that, when Leicester signed him earlier this year it was because they knew his top league average meant they’d be able to get decent guests when he went missing? How many meetings did he end up racing for Leicester?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Wee Eck said:

Is it a coincidence that for three years in a row, Craig has been “let go” by his previous teams? And, regardless of press releases, always for the same reason - unreliability?

Was there not a suggestion that, when Leicester signed him earlier this year it was because they knew his top league average meant they’d be able to get decent guests when he went missing? How many meetings did he end up racing for Leicester?

14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Wee Eck said:

Is it a coincidence that for three years in a row, Craig has been “let go” by his previous teams? And, regardless of press releases, always for the same reason - unreliability?

Was there not a suggestion that, when Leicester signed him earlier this year it was because they knew his top league average meant they’d be able to get decent guests when he went missing? How many meetings did he end up racing for Leicester?

But he got that place on merit 

His form at workington got him the place as dont think he started season with a top league place 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy