wtf Posted 23 hours ago Report Share Posted 23 hours ago On 12/24/2024 at 12:32 PM, Woke23 said: This forum us a brilliant forum getting ruined by one or two muppets unfortunately. Try and have a discussion and get immature responses. Cookie is the better rider but you never know if he's going to turn up or not. However, same can be said about batch. Good rider, not as good as Cookie, but has previous rep of spitting his dummy. Infact I'm sure he done it on occasions last season. I think it was oxford where he was pulling wheelies across the finishing line when we were getting battered and he was in third. Year before when he was at Birmingham in the pairs on a soaking wet race track Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted 23 hours ago Report Share Posted 23 hours ago (edited) 11 minutes ago, wtf said: Year before when he was at Birmingham in the pairs on a soaking wet race track It was Oxford.(riding for Birmingham though,which is what you might mean) Edited 23 hours ago by Fromafar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted 22 hours ago Report Share Posted 22 hours ago On 12/24/2024 at 10:30 AM, Midget said: There is no doubt that cook would of been the better number 1, anyone who has any knowledge of speedway will tell you that. I think we could struggle in in heats 13 and 15 next year, especially away from home. Workington's loss is certainly berwicks gain. 1 hour ago, wtf said: If that's the case and it's so obvious, it makes you wonder why the promotion chose one over the other? Probably because they wanted to get stronger in heats 2,8,12,&14? As much as I want Cook as part of a strong top 4, I would not have let go of Zischke or Vuolas, so could've ended up with a team like: Troy Batchelor 8.46 Craig Cook 8.42 Tate Zischke 6.96 Annti Vuolas 6.40 Vinnie Foord 3.90 Jack Smith 3.64 Sam McGurk 2.00 Total 39.78 So would Cook / Smith / McGurk score more than Bowes / Etheridge / Hook? I definitely wouldn't want a team with Foord starting in the top 5, I would not drop Zischke or Vuolas under any circumstances, so to create the strongest Workington team, it means either Cook or Batchelor had to go! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scaramanga Posted 20 hours ago Report Share Posted 20 hours ago At times last year batch was better than cook and At times cook was outstanding and batch not so good Personally don't think there's much in it On track Maybe batch is lot cheaper than cookie and that had a part to play in it Dont think the teams that bad to be honest 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCS Posted 20 hours ago Report Share Posted 20 hours ago Has anybody thought that Craig might just be a expensive rider who like people are saying let the team down. I know if he rode against us at Redcar Workington would have won. May be that made Workington chose Batchelor instead of Craig ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewy Posted 19 hours ago Report Share Posted 19 hours ago 13 minutes ago, SCS said: Has anybody thought that Craig might just be a expensive rider who like people are saying let the team down. I know if he rode against us at Redcar Workington would have won. May be that made Workington chose Batchelor instead of Craig ? Not really a fan of cookie but maybe he didn't turn up because of monies owed to him by Workington, difficult to be motivated when not being paid on time. Two sides to every coin! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCS Posted 19 hours ago Report Share Posted 19 hours ago He rode after our meeting so he must have been paid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewy Posted 19 hours ago Report Share Posted 19 hours ago 2 minutes ago, SCS said: He rode after our meeting so he must have been paid. Yes ,eventually 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnus Posted 18 hours ago Report Share Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, lewy said: Not really a fan of cookie but maybe he didn't turn up because of monies owed to him by Workington, difficult to be motivated when not being paid on time. Two sides to every coin! Same old Lewy. Is this the same unsubstantiated claim you have already made? Remember glass houses and stones don't mix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scaramanga Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago always such rumours in speedway and often at workington last year tales of late payments Kept poping up might be something in it or just might be tales from people claiming to know whats going on 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neila Posted 17 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 17 hours ago 26 minutes ago, magnus said: Same old Lewy. Is this the same unsubstantiated claim you have already made? Remember glass houses and stones don't mix. Lewy seems to know a lot about other tracks, bit says very little about Plymouth these day 😛 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Racin Jason 72 Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago 6 hours ago, wtf said: If that's the case and it's so obvious, it makes you wonder why the promotion chose one over the other? Maybe Troy is easier to work with ? Or maybe last season it was the reserves who didn’t get enough points so the promotion have changed the balance of the team. tate and antti should improve further to cover the loss of cookie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j2ohh Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Neila said: Lewy seems to know a lot about other tracks, bit says very little about Plymouth these day 😛 any comments about Plymouth will be in the waste department of this form . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Eck Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago Is it a coincidence that for three years in a row, Craig has been “let go” by his previous teams? And, regardless of press releases, always for the same reason - unreliability? Was there not a suggestion that, when Leicester signed him earlier this year it was because they knew his top league average meant they’d be able to get decent guests when he went missing? How many meetings did he end up racing for Leicester? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Normski Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Wee Eck said: Is it a coincidence that for three years in a row, Craig has been “let go” by his previous teams? And, regardless of press releases, always for the same reason - unreliability? Was there not a suggestion that, when Leicester signed him earlier this year it was because they knew his top league average meant they’d be able to get decent guests when he went missing? How many meetings did he end up racing for Leicester? 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scaramanga Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 43 minutes ago, Wee Eck said: Is it a coincidence that for three years in a row, Craig has been “let go” by his previous teams? And, regardless of press releases, always for the same reason - unreliability? Was there not a suggestion that, when Leicester signed him earlier this year it was because they knew his top league average meant they’d be able to get decent guests when he went missing? How many meetings did he end up racing for Leicester? But he got that place on merit His form at workington got him the place as dont think he started season with a top league place 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.