Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Kings Lynn vs Belle Vue - August 8th 2024


Recommended Posts

If it is postponed surely this needs to be announced today, fans have plans quite a few BV fans I know coming will need to cancel annual leave with work, riders will have plans.

there are no free dates to rearrange it unless they put it in 19 August instead of Birmingham meeting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2024 at 2:42 PM, Rob B said:

If it is postponed surely this needs to be announced today, fans have plans quite a few BV fans I know coming will need to cancel annual leave with work, riders will have plans.

there are no free dates to rearrange it unless they put it in 19 August instead of Birmingham meeting. 

Now Wednesday 28th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, TINYS said:

Pleased the forum is back up and running.

Me too. Busters fault I assume? Everything else seems to be his fault.... ;)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kelvinht said:

Me too. Busters fault I assume? Everything else seems to be his fault.... ;)

Basso rode in Danish final last night Chapman said he was injured :nono:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For once I agree with Buster here.

Impossible to field a half decent side let alone a competitive one, Would've lost a fortune on the night as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, TINYS said:

Now Wednesday 28th

2 matches in 2 days for Kings Lynn. Belle Vue will have to hope Poole don't arrange a meeting that night.

What happens if it rains (or any other Kings Lynn excuse) presume Belle Vue will be awarded points?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a fan of postponing matches due to lack of suitable guests. As things stand there is no encouragement to run with a full 7 man team, Plymouth, Berwick, Workington, Ipswich as well as Lynn all happy / willing to run with guests till the end of the season. But if clubs can call off matches when they can't get guests, even less need for clubs to sign replacements for missing riders.

While I think it's a shame a team being weaker through injury, I don't think it's a reason not to race.

Edited by szkocjasid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TTT said:

For once I agree with Buster here.

Impossible to field a half decent side let alone a competitive one, Would've lost a fortune on the night as well.

But he doesn’t mind going to an away track with Simon lambert as a number one and Lewis Kerr replacing a heat leader. 
it shows complete contempt to his fellow promoters when Lynn come to town with a poor team and yet when it’s busters pocket which takes a hit he claims he can’t put out a sub standard team and calls it off. 
if you can’t play with the big boys then go down a league and be competitive there 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sincerely hope that whoever did the press release, stating that running such a meeting would have lacked credibility, was laughing their knackers off as they typed that bit out...:D

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, eric i said:

This meeting would have taken precedence over the rearranged Polish meeting so Jan Kvech would have taken 28 day ban had he not turned up.

Apparently we have given away our Thursday priority. Poles have priority on a Thursday for rearranged fixtures. So, there would not have been a ban for Jan.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FromBendThree said:

Apparently we have given away our Thursday priority. Poles have priority on a Thursday for rearranged fixtures. So, there would not have been a ban for Jan.

This scenario was in place when we signed Dan but were prevented from using him by the BSPL. They trotted out a line that no deal had been done when in reality is was due to the fact that UK teams had assembled without “polish” riders and they didn’t like the fact we had, so they stopped us using Dan. The current deal wasn’t deemed acceptable at the time but somehow a few months later, it was fine. Stopping a Brit, the British champion no less from competing in the British league, you couldn’t make it up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Racin Jason 72 said:

But he doesn’t mind going to an away track with Simon lambert as a number one and Lewis Kerr replacing a heat leader. 
it shows complete contempt to his fellow promoters when Lynn come to town with a poor team and yet when it’s busters pocket which takes a hit he claims he can’t put out a sub standard team and calls it off. 
if you can’t play with the big boys then go down a league and be competitive there 

To be fair, what you accurately describe is pretty much "par for the course" ....

Quite happy to ride away with a "weakened team" but always want their top riders at each home meeting...

Pretty standard practice....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, FromBendThree said:

Apparently we have given away our Thursday priority. Poles have priority on a Thursday for rearranged fixtures. So, there would not have been a ban for Jan.

We gave up priority on Thursdays so the Poles would let the UK use "their riders"...

Eg Tai, Emil, Chris Holder, Kvech etc, (and even some Poles!!)...

As the UK knew that getting more top riders back would grow their crowds significantly....

A good plan...;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy