Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Ipswich vs Oxford 18th April


Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, chun said:

they need to close this loophole by including scores from the guest bookings to count toward his rolling average?

And also R Lambert for the last two years if there's to be equity.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, SPEEDY69 said:

And also R Lambert for the last two years if there's to be equity.

lambert, or any other playoff mercenary, should come at a premium on their fair rolling average

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, szkocjasid said:

They changed the rules to allow more guests.

I guess because the fans all love guests?

Scott and Bomber had several blank dates in their calendar.....:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure i read it somewhere that a 28 day contract doesn't count towards his average same as guesting hence why he had a month at Wolves last season and then stepped in at Birmingham at the start of this season and still retains the same average regardless of his scores

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kevin bass said:

Sure i read it somewhere that a 28 day contract doesn't count towards his average same as guesting hence why he had a month at Wolves last season and then stepped in at Birmingham at the start of this season and still retains the same average regardless of his scores

Nah, a 28 day replacement does count for averages, Nicholls will get a new average in May. Last year he only guested for Wolves, so didn't affect his average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Badge said:

Lol this will be our 3rd home meeting and Scott will have ridden in them all 

Seriously devalues the product as a sporting contest

Farcical situation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

Seriously devalues the product as a sporting contest

Farcical situation

Not really sure why they've started dishing out guests for second strings, that's what R/R is for I'd have thought.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

Seriously devalues the product as a sporting contest

Farcical situation

Great to see the old boys whipping the young 'uns sometimes :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, chun said:

they need to close this loophole by including scores from the guest bookings to count toward his rolling average?

And get riders taking guest bookings and scoring nothing so it then lowers their average? That would be a daft idea.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Najjer said:

And get riders taking guest bookings and scoring nothing so it then lowers their average? That would be a daft idea.

would they not earn any money then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bagpuss said:

Not really sure why they've started dishing out guests for second strings, that's what R/R is for I'd have thought.

I think it's because Leicester were weakened last year when Morris got banned & they had to use r/r. 

Then at the AGM the other promoters probably thought "that could happen to me" so they voted for more guests allowed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, szkocjasid said:

I think it's because Leicester were weakened last year when Morris got banned & they had to use r/r. 

Then at the AGM the other promoters probably thought "that could happen to me" so they voted for more guests allowed.


That seems bonkers. Losing a rider because of injury or whatever reason should inevitably make your team weaker, that is the reality of it. 

Unfortunately they have now created a scenario where not only are you no longer weaker but you are actually far stronger. When riding at home with no logical reason using maths and statistics, you can get a guest with a higher percentage average than the missing rider. We now even have a scenario at Oxford where they’ve sacked and replaced a rider in Klindt, for Riss whilst keeping an injured rider in the side. There is no way that the league should of accepted that redecoration and the use of guests like Nicholls now.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Najjer said:


That seems bonkers. Losing a rider because of injury or whatever reason should inevitably make your team weaker, that is the reality of it. 

Unfortunately they have now created a scenario where not only are you no longer weaker but you are actually far stronger. When riding at home with no logical reason using maths and statistics, you can get a guest with a higher percentage average than the missing rider. We now even have a scenario at Oxford where they’ve sacked and replaced a rider in Klindt, for Riss whilst keeping an injured rider in the side. There is no way that the league should of accepted that redecoration and the use of guests like Nicholls now.

Totally agree - completely ridiculous to be able make this change and still use a guest

It seems to be one step forward and two back in the attempt to get the sport back from the brink when something like this is allowed to happen

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Najjer said:


That seems bonkers. Losing a rider because of injury or whatever reason should inevitably make your team weaker, that is the reality of it. 

That's the problem with many speedway promoters / fans etc. They act like if you are weakened by injury that's a disaster & shouldn't be allowed. To me that should be expected & accepted.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Najjer said:

We now even have a scenario at Oxford where they’ve sacked and replaced a rider in Klindt, for Riss whilst keeping an injured rider in the side. There is no way that the league should of accepted that redecoration and the use of guests like Nicholls now.

As Riss could replace Kerr, meaning Oxford would no longer need a guest, I would support a ruling where Oxford were not allowed to drop Klindt & still use a guest for Kerr.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sheffield's scandalous use of guests in the final last year spring to mind.  Etheridge for Vissing (who barely rode before getting injured) basically won them the league:

6. Jye Etheridge (G) - 3, 1, 0, 2', 3 = 9+1

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy