Pauldoveyspeedway Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 1 hour ago, Deano said: But you are assuming Zagar or Schlein wanted to ride. We don't know the ins and outs of all these discussions, just what eaks out in press releases and what we read on the web. They needed Pawlicki at 5 and a Top rider at 1...Then they would have stood a chance ..They had the points to play with .. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 1 hour ago, Pauldoveyspeedway said: They needed Pawlicki at 5 and a Top rider at 1...Then they would have stood a chance ..They had the points to play with .. For all we know, only Milik (out of all the options and negotiations), wanted to join us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col Posted January 31 Author Report Share Posted January 31 The big unknown in this team is Lampart, if he takes to British tracks like Musielak then Birmingham could have a decent side. Most Polish supporters & certainly the Polish authorities seem to rate Lampart over Musielak. Sadly I can't see that occuring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Jacobs Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 On 1/23/2024 at 8:58 PM, Call me wolfie said: That’s why you start building with the top riders then make the most of what’s left, just seems a waste of 1.59 points to me. Wolves were crucified on here a couple of years ago for doing similar. As I said though - maybe Brum did look at riders who would be assessed at 8, but decided against, for whatever reason (cost, overall availability, etc.). Hence, by signing riders on 7.50, they've not got so close to the limit. Surely that's not too difficult to understand? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauldoveyspeedway Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 1 hour ago, Col said: The big unknown in this team is Lampart, if he takes to British tracks like Musielak then Birmingham could have a decent side. Most Polish supporters & certainly the Polish authorities seem to rate Lampart over Musielak. Sadly I can't see that occuring. 1 hour ago, Deano said: For all we know, only Milik (out of all the options and negotiations), wanted to join us. It seems that way .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauldoveyspeedway Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 1 hour ago, Col said: The big unknown in this team is Lampart, if he takes to British tracks like Musielak then Birmingham could have a decent side. Most Polish supporters & certainly the Polish authorities seem to rate Lampart over Musielak. Sadly I can't see that occuring. Cant see that but u nva know .otherwise he would have gone to another club ..good luck to them .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauldoveyspeedway Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 7 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said: As I said though - maybe Brum did look at riders who would be assessed at 8, but decided against, for whatever reason (cost, overall availability, etc.). Hence, by signing riders on 7.50, they've not got so close to the limit. Surely that's not too difficult to understand? Milik is over assessed with that ave ...so really they are even more under the limit . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LagutaRacingFan Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 No way does Pawlicki average 8. 2 of his 5 races will be heat 13 and 15. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Call me wolfie Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 18 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said: As I said though - maybe Brum did look at riders who would be assessed at 8, but decided against, for whatever reason (cost, overall availability, etc.). Hence, by signing riders on 7.50, they've not got so close to the limit. Surely that's not too difficult to understand? No need for such a patronising post is there? Just making your point is enough surely. After all everyone is entitled to their opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noaksey Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 Can't see Pawlicki being an 8, if he lives up to his assessed average he'll have done well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teromaafan Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 2 hours ago, Roger Jacobs said: As I said though - maybe Brum did look at riders who would be assessed at 8, but decided against, for whatever reason (cost, overall availability, etc.). Hence, by signing riders on 7.50, they've not got so close to the limit. Surely that's not too difficult to understand? Stop trying to be clever. Brum’s top end are a pick from what left overs were available and could be tempted! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebv Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 (edited) Both Pawlicki and Milik are riding one position up from where ideally they should be.. And there isn't a "natural No 3" behind them.. And Brum will know this... But at least they come to the tapes, and, hopefully will still be doing so when the season ends.. Edit. They remind a bit of when the Aces had Stead at No1, you knew where the team would end up, but at least there was a track to visit... Edited February 1 by mikebv Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauldoveyspeedway Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 9 hours ago, noaksey said: Can't see Pawlicki being an 8, if he lives up to his assessed average he'll have done well Around his assessed ave .cant see milik getting to his .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauldoveyspeedway Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 9 hours ago, Teromaafan said: Stop trying to be clever. Brum’s top end are a pick from what left overs were available and could be tempted! But that wont get people through the turnstiles... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AceBelle Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 11 hours ago, LagutaRacingFan said: No way does Pawlicki average 8. 2 of his 5 races will be heat 13 and 15. heat 15 doesn't count towards average 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambo Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 1 hour ago, AceBelle said: heat 15 doesn't count towards average Oh yes it does! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biffa Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 Since when? Thought it was programmed rides only? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebv Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 14 minutes ago, Biffa said: Since when? Thought it was programmed rides only? The usual BSF debate topic.. ... Ht 15 counts.... Hence Pawlicki, who will come up against the other No1 a possible, (probable) 3 times per meeting, will do well to deliver 10 points from his usual five rides to hit an 8 point average.. Especially when you add in a probable 3 races against some of the No5's on show this year... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiveusaB Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 I think that there will only be 3 riders that maintain/improve(slightly) their average at B'ham this season? Cook/Brennan/Flint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teromaafan Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 1 hour ago, Biffa said: Since when? Thought it was programmed rides only? Averages are total points scored divided by number of rides, multiplied by four. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.