Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Poole v Glasgow Championship Final 2nd Leg 11/10/23


Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Bagpuss said:

I keep reading this and I always have the same thought.....a club like Glasgow with a good racetrack moving up would enhance the Prem, so even if one considered the top league to be 'inferior' it would be less so with Glasgow in it. You'd have seven in each division and a more even spread of the better circuits. Plus why would you not want to see the likes of Emil, Doyle, Bewley, Holder, Tai, Laguta, Lambert etc on a regular basis?

Biggest issue I can see is race night I think Friday works best for the Glasgow crowd. I don’t mind the odd off night but wouldn’t want Monday and Thursday to be our regular race night 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bagpuss said:

I keep reading this and I always have the same thought.....a club like Glasgow with a good racetrack moving up would enhance the Prem, so even if one considered the top league to be 'inferior' it would be less so with Glasgow in it. You'd have seven in each division and a more even spread of the better circuits. Plus why would you not want to see the likes of Emil, Doyle, Bewley, Holder, Tai, Laguta, Lambert etc on a regular basis?

Looking at that list, I can think of at least 2 reasons!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jaizer said:

As the fog clears from my hangover, had a thought. Do Poole fans think that by choosing the easy group in the play offs may have affected them? Glasgow were battle hardened from 2 tough matches with Oxford and fighting back from 10-2 down at Redcar. Whereas scunny at home apart Poole cruised through. 

Son of god's move on Lee apart I don't recall any all out going for gaps you might expect from a team behind in a play off final 

It would have made no difference. As soon as Glasgow signed the ringer, the title was theirs.  It made no difference which teams Poole had picked. Glasgow upgraded from a rider lucky to get a couple of points away, to a rider who topped the averages, on what, 9.4? . A second string no hoper to an Extraleague heat leader on a “legit” 5 points. From that moment the title was decided and no team, Oxford or Poole, could compete with a team who had got a huge points injection.

It was “within the rules”, no matter how ridiculous the rules are for allowing an assessed 5 point premier league rider into the Championship in the same average, so Glasgow did nothing wrong, but as a competition, the Championship as a competition was at that moment killed stone dead. 

Edited by Steve Shovlar
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Steve Shovlar said:

It would have made no difference. As soon as Glasgow signed the ringer, the title was theirs.  It made no difference which teams Poole had picked. Glasgow upgraded from a rider lucky to get a couple of points away, to a rider who topped the averages, on what, 9.4? . A second string no hoper to an Extraleague heat leader on a “legit” 5 points. From that moment the title was decided and no team, Oxford or Poole, could compete with a team who had got a huge points injection.

It was “within the rules”, no matter how ridiculous the rules are for allowing an assessed 5 point premier league rider into the Championship in the same average, so Glasgow did nothing wrong, but as a competition, the Championship as a competition was at that moment killed stone dead. 

What happened to not talking about it? :rofl:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Jaizer said:

What happened to not talking about it? :rofl:

You asked the question. I gave the answer. Though I gave it the day Tarasenko was signed. I wrote, on the Glasgow 2023 thread,

Ridiculous that Tarasenko has the same 5 average in both Premier and Championship. There’s really no doubt whatsoever that Glasgow with this signing will win the Championship this season.

They won’t need decent reserves as the top 5 will be overpowering. It’s a signing similar to Lambert coming into BV last season to win the playoffs for them.

But if it is within the rules, then so be it.

Edited by Steve Shovlar
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair , Shovvy said it weeks ago and said it before the second leg. And he has been pretty gracious in defeat I would say. 
 

And so he should be as Poole down the years have pulled many strokes over the course of a season!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Skidder1 said:

Looking at that list, I can think of at least 2 reasons!!

Everyone has riders they do and don't like but if a promotion has ambition and the financial means to stage top flight speedway then the opportunity to see world class riders every home meeting is a no brainer. Especially round a track like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Steve Shovlar said:

It would have made no difference. As soon as Glasgow signed the ringer, the title was theirs.  It made no difference which teams Poole had picked. Glasgow upgraded from a rider lucky to get a couple of points away, to a rider who topped the averages, on what, 9.4? . A second string no hoper to an Extraleague heat leader on a “legit” 5 points. From that moment the title was decided and no team, Oxford or Poole, could compete with a team who had got a huge points injection.

It was “within the rules”, no matter how ridiculous the rules are for allowing an assessed 5 point premier league rider into the Championship in the same average, so Glasgow did nothing wrong, but as a competition, the Championship as a competition was at that moment killed stone dead. 

I know its been difficult for you and I can understand your frustration but thought I'd add some facts to your emotional outbursts. From the BSPL web site, Marcin Nowak's Rolling Average from 14 meetings was 7.16. His real average (not Green Sheet) based on his 10 meetings this year was 6.70. His home average was 6.30 and his away average was 7.25. Now do you really think these are the figures of a "no hoper"?

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Pinny said:

To be fair , Shovvy said it weeks ago and said it before the second leg. And he has been pretty gracious in defeat I would say. 
 

And so he should be as Poole down the years have pulled many strokes over the course of a season!!

But nothing like bringing in a 5 point ringer just before the playoffs. Or like when Coventry brought in Shamek then avoided him getting an official average by saying he was sick/injured so he was at reserve for the playoff final and rattled off an 18 max.. Poole just build rock solid teams year after year without the shinanigans. Last year the Premier league became a joke with ringer Lambert coming in for BV. Within the rules but stunk the place out.

Danny and Matt knew the rule was there, though it never should have been. Would they have sacked either Anders or Kyle to bring in Tarasenko? No. There’s winning and there’s winning. Like I have always said, Glasgow did no wrong as it was ridiculously within the rules, but it ended the league comp stone dead back in August.

Edited by Steve Shovlar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Steve Shovlar said:

But nothing like bringing in a 5 point ringer just before the playoffs. Or like when Coventry brought in Shamek then avoided him getting an official average by saying he was sick/injured so he was at reserve for the playoff final and rattled off an 18 max.. Poole just build rock solid teams year after year without the shinanigans. Last year the Premier league became a joke with ringer Lambert coming in for BV. Within the rules but stunk the place out.

Danny and Matt knew the rule was there, though it never should have been. Would they have sacked either Anders or Kyle to bring in Tarasenko? No. There’s winning and there’s winning. Like I have always said, Glasgow did no wrong as it was ridiculously within the rules, but it ended the league comp stone dead back in August.

I think Poole are running the club on a tighter budget these days. If Tarasenko was willing to ride for the same money as Rowe or Kyle then absolutely they would of signed him, assuming they knew he was available and able to be signed. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SharpenRake said:

I know its been difficult for you and I can understand your frustration but thought I'd add some facts to your emotional outbursts. From the BSPL web site, Marcin Nowak's Rolling Average from 14 meetings was 7.16. His real average (not Green Sheet) based on his 10 meetings this year was 6.70. His home average was 6.30 and his away average was 7.25. Now do you really think these are the figures of a "no hoper"?

Harsh calling him a no hoper. But that was what he was at Poole. 

2.. Marcin Nowak - 0,0,0 = 0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Steve Shovlar said:

But nothing like bringing in a 5 point ringer just before the playoffs. Or like when Coventry brought in Shamek then avoided him getting an official average by saying he was sick/injured so he was at reserve for the playoff final and rattled off an 18 max.. Poole just build rock solid teams year after year without the shinanigans. Last year the Premier league became a joke with ringer Lambert coming in for BV. Within the rules but stunk the place out.

Danny and Matt knew the rule was there, though it never should have been. Would they have sacked either Anders or Kyle to bring in Tarasenko? No. There’s winning and there’s winning. Like I have always said, Glasgow did no wrong as it was ridiculously within the rules, but it ended the league comp stone dead back in August.

You should be suicide watch after last nights defeat.IMO 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pinny said:

I think Poole are running the club on a tighter budget these days. If Tarasenko was willing to ride for the same money as Rowe or Kyle then absolutely they would have signed him, assuming they knew he was available and able to be signed. 

You think Tarasenko was on the same money as Nowak? Treble it and half way there. Big money.
 

Poole definitely run within budget. Not run to lose money. 

Edited by Steve Shovlar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Steve Shovlar said:

You think Tarasenko was on the same money as Nowak? Treble it and half way there. Big money.

Hence why I said Poole are running on a tighter budget these days therefore wouldn't of splashed the cash on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pinny said:

Hence why I said Poole are running on a tighter budget these days therefore wouldn't have splashed the cash on him. 

The Glasgow owners are happy to run at a loss. Most other promotions are not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy