Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Got to be Two leagues then


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, HGould said:

My hunch as others have alluded to. 

PL possibly rebranded Elite. 

Aim to gave a GP level rider t number 1 and a couple of strong domestic level  heat leaders at 2 and 3.

A couple of 5 to 6 point second strings and a reserve and rising star

CL 

One heat leader from PL from 2nd or 3rd HL slot 

Second string and reserve PL allowed in heat leader CL roles. 

Second string in CL must be no higher than PL reserve or rising star

Reserves in CL to be NDL current second strings or reserves

This would involve a thorough list of all riders listed by category for HL SS RS respectively for both leagues. 

PL standard higher CL standard a mid point between CL and upper NDL

Lower NDL level to ride in 6 heat junior teams for any PL or CL clubs who wanted as second half 

No B Teams in 2 leagues. 

Aim to get Workington, Mildenhall possibly Kent financially able to compete in CL by fixed pay rates no guarantees. 

 

 

 

No guarantees is a rule now but it is vastly ignored and no way of stopping it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the bspl will look at the way this season has gone with the erratic fixture list,poor timing of cup competitions and the late play off fixtures in unfavourable weather conditions..............and make absolutely no change, more of the same i expect!

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 League

2 home 2 away

League Trophy for top of the League Champions.

Play-off Trophy - Top two teams in league standing through to play-off - 4 team Final.

Teams finishing 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th have a 4 team Semi Final.....top two through to Final.

Both the Semi-Final and the Final is held at a neutral venue, maybe drawn from venues of teams finishing below 6th in the league?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, K7KDD said:

1 League

2 home 2 away

League Trophy for top of the League Champions.

Play-off Trophy - Top two teams in league standing through to play-off - 4 team Final.

Teams finishing 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th have a 4 team Semi Final.....top two through to Final.

Both the Semi-Final and the Final is held at a neutral venue, maybe drawn from venues of teams finishing below 6th in the league?

 

I should have added....No K cup, No BSN trophy.....all that is cancelled and focus is on the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dilemma , most riders have got used to riding in at least two Leagues in the UK and other Leagues across Europe to make Speedway pay, even the riders who are riding solely in the UK  are used to riding in two Leagues plus getting guest payments, some have jobs but will work around Speedway when not riding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, topaz325 said:

Dilemma , most riders have got used to riding in at least two Leagues in the UK and other Leagues across Europe to make Speedway pay, even the riders who are riding solely in the UK  are used to riding in two Leagues plus getting guest payments, some have jobs but will work around Speedway when not riding. 

"Enough meetings for riders" is the starting point, and the major objective that must be delivered..

Seconded by "What level of rider can my club afford to have"...

The structure chosen then has to reflect those two objectives..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, topaz325 said:

Dilemma , most riders have got used to riding in at least two Leagues in the UK and other Leagues across Europe to make Speedway pay, even the riders who are riding solely in the UK  are used to riding in two Leagues plus getting guest payments, some have jobs but will work around Speedway when not riding. 

Do what’s best for the sport. If that means riders noses are put out of joint and they have to get jobs on the side so be it. The competitor should bend to the will of the sport they want to compete in, not the other way around. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mikebv said:

"Enough meetings for riders" is the starting point, and the major objective that must be delivered..

Seconded by "What level of rider can my club afford to have"...

The structure chosen then has to reflect those two objectives..

Absolutely not.

Don’t get me wrong; there will be some disgruntled riders and clubs, should the leagues merge, but it’ll be for the long-term health of British Speedway.

Our very own Chris Harris will arguably suffer most, but we’ve now reached a point of farce: the Premiership will have one more club in it than a Champions League group and the qualifying for the Championship’s play-offs isn’t a novelty because more teams do than don’t. Variety is near non-existent in British Speedway and that is the biggest threat to the sport in this country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheWellBehavedWorrall said:

Absolutely not.

Don’t get me wrong; there will be some disgruntled riders and clubs, should the leagues merge, but it’ll be for the long-term health of British Speedway.

Our very own Chris Harris will arguably suffer most, but we’ve now reached a point of farce: the Premiership will have one more club in it than a Champions League group and the qualifying for the Championship’s play-offs isn’t a novelty because more teams do than don’t. Variety is near non-existent in British Speedway and that is the biggest threat to the sport in this country.

A pipe dream...

You cannot run the level that the promoters want without ensuring many riders have to be full time pros..

2nd Div Promoters want to use Div 1 level HL's, so that Div1 HL needs to be spending plenty and therefore expects a decent return...

When £30k (and often well, well above) is the outlay on kit then riders need to ride as much as is possible..

In a perfect world, there would be clear demarcation within the leagues, and organic aspirational growth, with no rider sharing..

That ship sailed many, many years ago (if it had even ever been contemplated that is)...

Speedway in the UK is in "survival mode" rather than "growth mode", and has been for a good many years, with promoters doing their level best in their own way to keep it going...

If they could "run it properly like other sports" then I am 100% sure they would..

What we have is pretty much all there is, so no point in hoping for any magic wand to come along and change things..

Enjoy the racing, but dont get too bothered about the results, is the best way to look at UK Speedway... 

It still has the ability to provide huge excitement and a good night out when done well, as a fair few tracks do...

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mikebv said:

A pipe dream...

You cannot run the level that the promoters want without ensuring many riders have to be full time pros..

2nd Div Promoters want to use Div 1 level HL's, so that Div1 HL needs to be spending plenty and therefore expects a decent return...

When £30k (and often well, well above) is the outlay on kit then riders need to ride as much as is possible..

In a perfect world, there would be clear demarcation within the leagues, and organic aspirational growth, with no rider sharing..

That ship sailed many, many years ago (if it had even ever been contemplated that is)...

Speedway in the UK is in "survival mode" rather than "growth mode", and has been for a good many years, with promoters doing their level best in their own way to keep it going...

If they could "run it properly like other sports" then I am 100% sure they would..

What we have is pretty much all there is, so no point in hoping for any magic wand to come along and change things..

Enjoy the racing, but dont get too bothered about the results, is the best way to look at UK Speedway... 

It still has the ability to provide huge excitement and a good night out when done well, as a fair few tracks do...

 

 

Like you say enjoy the racing results don’t really matter.It’s still a good night’s entertainment to the diehards.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Merge the top two tiers. Change race format and have 5 rider teams instead of 7. Each team races each other once at home and once away. Top 4 do a 4TT style play off at end of season.

If the teams closing actually go (Wolves, Peterborough) then you can't go with two leagues again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikebv said:

A pipe dream...

You cannot run the level that the promoters want without ensuring many riders have to be full time pros..

2nd Div Promoters want to use Div 1 level HL's, so that Div1 HL needs to be spending plenty and therefore expects a decent return...

When £30k (and often well, well above) is the outlay on kit then riders need to ride as much as is possible..

In a perfect world, there would be clear demarcation within the leagues, and organic aspirational growth, with no rider sharing..

That ship sailed many, many years ago (if it had even ever been contemplated that is)...

Speedway in the UK is in "survival mode" rather than "growth mode", and has been for a good many years, with promoters doing their level best in their own way to keep it going...

If they could "run it properly like other sports" then I am 100% sure they would..

What we have is pretty much all there is, so no point in hoping for any magic wand to come along and change things..

Enjoy the racing, but dont get too bothered about the results, is the best way to look at UK Speedway... 

It still has the ability to provide huge excitement and a good night out when done well, as a fair few tracks do...

 

 

I’ve liked this for honesty, but find it somewhat a defeatist mentality and that isn’t a criticism; I simply don’t know the costs associated with running a club.

Your comment about enjoying the racing, but not getting bothered by the result is sad (again, not a criticism) because if you had been to Ashfield for the Oxford and Poole matches and no doubt Wimborne Road tonight, you’d see how much those results mean to people.

You’re obviously well-educated on the subject, but I’d be interested to hear what your thoughts are on what’s caused British Speedway to find itself in this situation?

Again, I’d like to reiterate that none of this is a criticism; you’re more than likely accurate with your comments and sometimes, the truth hurts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pinny said:

Merge the top two tiers. Change race format and have 5 rider teams instead of 7. Each team races each other once at home and once away. Top 4 do a 4TT style play off at end of season.

If the teams closing actually go (Wolves, Peterborough) then you can't go with two leagues again.

Five rider teams would be the death knell for me. The circle would just get even smaller with less riders required and the same amount of doubling up undoubtedly allowed. Then you’ll get riders missing and sides competing with a four rider line up and R/R. It would make the sport more tinpot than it already is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Ben91 said:

Five rider teams would be the death knell for me. The circle would just get even smaller with less riders required and the same amount of doubling up undoubtedly allowed. Then you’ll get riders missing and sides competing with a four rider line up and R/R. It would make the sport more tinpot than it already is. 

Youd have to have less riders per team as if all teams are in one league you couldnt have doubling up. There isnt enough riders to go round of a good standard for a big league, and there isnt enough clubs anymore to do two leagues plus a NDL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Pinny said:

Youd have to have less riders per team as if all teams are in one league you couldnt have doubling up. There isnt enough riders to go round of a good standard for a big league, and there isnt enough clubs anymore to do two leagues plus a NDL. 

Less riders per team weakens the sport just as much as a slightly weaker league to accommodate the standard of riders we have/can attract here. 

So long as the racing is competitive and teams aren’t made up of wobblers then fans will attend. There are enough riders out there for that to be feasible with one league and seven rider teams.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ben91 said:

Do what’s best for the sport. If that means riders noses are put out of joint and they have to get jobs on the side so be it. The competitor should bend to the will of the sport they want to compete in, not the other way around. 

Agree,that’s why the sport is in such decline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy