Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Ipswich v Sheffield play off final 1st leg


Recommended Posts

Just now, Falcon1983 said:

6 side prem next season so 7 riders will already be on the sidelines next year, and its not the sidelines its a squad place! So could ride some weeks others not

A fair few riders available for the 2nd rising star spot

Might entice some other riders back for a squad place Tungate, Bjerre, Thorsell, Michelsen, Thomsen etc

Might attract some younger european riders to take a squad place 

Might even attract riders like Vaculik, Lambert, Lindgren to share a no.1 berth

Plus there are a few riders already in the championship who would like a squad place  Thomsen, Etheridge, Batchelor, Knudsen etc.

If you rode speedway and had a championship ride and no top flight ride, would you settle for a squad place in the top flight, absolutely you would 

 

 

Unworkable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As my previous post Sheffield have plenty of other riders to choose from. Even tho their averages might not be as high as the one being replaced, Ipswich could only get Harris who's average was almost 2.5 below Doyle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, yorkshiretyke said:

But yet, the only reason why Ipswich are even in the final is due to a Peterborough team (that made as many, if not more changes than Sheffield) winning an unlikely tie on aggregate against Leicester after improving their team massively. 

But of course, that was all fine!!

Sheffield made changes when certain riders were underperforming, Ipswich didn't despite many fans calling for King (at that point) and Riss to go. 

Are Sheffield any stronger with guests than with Tai and Tobi, not on paper but could be. Are they any stronger than the first team put together, not really. 

It is what it is!! Lets just hope for a great close final and may the best team win! 

Massively.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Falcon1983 said:

10 man squads for next season

An extra rising star, then a choice between sharing the no.1 spot, or an additional heat leader avg below their stated no.1 and an additional 2nd string

Guests and RR at an absolute must if you have 4 riders injured in your 10 rider squad

For example, Ipswich

1. Sayfutdinov 

2. Riss

3. Douglas

4. B. Cook

5. Doyle

6. Rew

7. D Thompson

HL Res 8. King - covers any missing heat leader who has a higher average

SS Res 9. Hume - covers any 2nd string or Reserve who has a higher average 

RS Res 10. J. Thompson - covers for any missing reserve or rising star 

 

Worst case scenario if Doyle and Emil were missing together 

King comes in for Emil, 4th highest avg becomes 3rd heat leader and Hume comes in as a 2nd string or no.6

 

 

 

 

and every team runs out of money

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SUPERACE said:

It's a complete cock up.  Harris rode in the semi final so he should fall under the same rules as Belle Vue and Wolves riders.  It makes no sense that this is allowed to happen.  The Rules again are making a mockery of the sport. 

Indeed he should

And what happened to the "gentleman's agreement" that was supposedly in place to prevent it despite the regs not ruling it out?

Can only assume that means that one of the parties isn't a gentleman.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, yorkshiretyke said:

But yet, the only reason why Ipswich are even in the final is due to a Peterborough team (that made as many, if not more changes than Sheffield) winning an unlikely tie on aggregate against Leicester after improving their team massively. 

But of course, that was all fine!!

Sheffield made changes when certain riders were underperforming, Ipswich didn't despite many fans calling for King (at that point) and Riss to go. 

Are Sheffield any stronger with guests than with Tai and Tobi, not on paper but could be. Are they any stronger than the first team put together, not really. 

It is what it is!! Lets just hope for a great close final and may the best team win! 

That's just too sensible for some of the Ipswich fans to understand

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking forward to his expose/bombshell story in the winter about how bad British speedway is being run when he's the main person taking advantage of it.

His team win a meeting that puts another team through and he gets 3 more chances to earn some money off the back of it. Shame cup-tied isn't a thing in speedway! 

But, it wouldn't be a speedway play off final without him in there somewhere, even if it's just Kelvin droning on about him crashing and winning the rerun all those years ago.

Last 10 years I think he's only missed 2 finals

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, yorkshiretyke said:

But yet, the only reason why Ipswich are even in the final is due to a Peterborough team (that made as many, if not more changes than Sheffield) winning an unlikely tie on aggregate against Leicester after improving their team massively. 

But of course, that was all fine!!

Sheffield made changes when certain riders were underperforming, Ipswich didn't despite many fans calling for King (at that point) and Riss to go. 

Are Sheffield any stronger with guests than with Tai and Tobi, not on paper but could be. Are they any stronger than the first team put together, not really. 

It is what it is!! Lets just hope for a great close final and may the best team win! 

No disagreement from me on the principle of what went on at Peterborough has been a complete crock of rubbish too. A typical speedway shambles

Ipswich actually had to go to both Boro and Lynn after each had strengthened where others didn't so I'd hardly say that it was cut and dried that it was only that that Leicester defeat that meant qualification

Too many variable to pin it on one instance but carry on with the smoke and mirrors distraction tactics.....:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, SUPERACE said:

It's a shambles that Chris Harris can guest For Sheffield having already rode for Ipswich.  The rules are making a joke of the sport again.

Are they..I followed speedway for years are in a new  match you can use a guest if the ave is correct . I expect Harris has rode for most teams this year.. no idea what all the fuss is about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

No disagreement from me on the principle of what went on at Peterborough has been a complete crock of rubbish too. A typical speedway shambles

Ipswich actually had to go to both Boro and Lynn after each had strengthened where others didn't so I'd hardly say that it was cut and dried that it was only that that Leicester defeat that meant qualification

Too many variable to pin it on one instance but carry on with the smoke and mirrors distraction tactics.....:P

But so did Sheffield have to go to Peterborough (twice) after them strengthening - and lost twice. 

We all agree, speedway in this country is a complete shambles, but i don't think Sheffield had much choice in what they have done, certainly no different to what other teams would do if they can/could. 

This is a forum and people will defend/criticize their own and or others - its life.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

Indeed he should

And what happened to the "gentleman's agreement" that was supposedly in place to prevent it despite the regs not ruling it out?

Can only assume that means that one of the parties isn't a gentleman.....

What gentleman agreement was that.. got a link to it? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, yorkshiretyke said:

But so did Sheffield have to go to Peterborough (twice) after them strengthening - and lost twice. 

We all agree, speedway in this country is a complete shambles, but i don't think Sheffield had much choice in what they have done, certainly no different to what other teams would do if they can/could. 

This is a forum and people will defend/criticize their own and or others - its life.  

They had a choice to use Lambert - on a ridiculously low assessed average and unavailable in terms of how the guest rule has always been interpreted OR if he was awarded a true figure

They had a choice to use Harris who has already ridden in the play offs 

No point in anymore debate about either really

I will likely be I the minority but I will again choose not to part with my cash to see this as it doesn't meet the principles I expect 

Enjoy yourself :t:

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

They had a choice to use Lambert - on a ridiculously low assessed average and unavailable in terms of how the guest rule has always been interpreted OR if he was awarded a true figure

They had a choice to use Harris who has already ridden in the play offs 

No point in anymore debate about either really

I will likely be I the minority but I will again choose not to part with my cash to see this as it doesn't meet the principles I expect 

Enjoy yourself :t:

 

Made up principles in your case...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, AceBelle said:

The likes of Lambert woffinden etc on low averages will be gone next season because  they have new averages gained this season 

Lambert doesn't, unless guest booking count?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, orion said:

Made up principles in your case...

All principles are made up

"a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behaviour or for a chain of reasoning"

The literal dictionary definition......

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy