Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Ipswich v Sheffield play off final 1st leg


Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Hawk127 said:

Yep, drag all that equipment to the stadium only for racing to stop after heat 10. Oh sorry they have already done that one in the last week or so. 

No, I think it's getting to heat four and then having to come back again to show the re-staging, costs 5 figures

Edited by SPEEDY69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Racin Jason 72 said:

And Rew for Belle Vue  earlier in the season and I believe lynn named tarasenko before the ex chairman had to adhere to the rules 

Has anyone with a * next to their name had a guest booking?  I haven't checked.

As mentioned, I was informed by the BSPL Office that Lambert can ride because his 2019 average is considered to be an Established MA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the reply I received from the BSPA Office:

"You have quoted the rule yourself and it does not mention 'assessed', it says 'have an established MA' and Robert Lambert DOES have an established average, from 2019, he just hasn't done enough meetings to update that for this season.

Without appearing to be too long winded, that rule is with regards riders who have never had an established MA, hence it does not mention 'assessed'. I believe other riders in a similar position have guested this season, but nobody has queried that? I don't want to drone on but what if a rider is riding on his converted CL MA and has that * by his name, have they ever not been able to guest? Next season that box will be changed as it is obviously misleading when it suits!"

Reading that last sentence, I wasn't sure wether to laugh or have a fit of hysterics :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Racin Jason 72 said:

I don’t think anyone is disputing you are not abiding by the rules but its difficult to be sympathetic when you sacked two fit riders just before the cut off. 
all within the rules but does give the impression of win at all costs.  
up the witches

And how many times did i read in the Ipswich threads that the supporters wanted to get rid of King & Riss, a weekly occurrence for quite a few weeks, but Sheffield were wrong to actually do it

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said:

Here's the reply I received from the BSPA Office:

"You have quoted the rule yourself and it does not mention 'assessed', it says 'have an established MA' and Robert Lambert DOES have an established average, from 2019, he just hasn't done enough meetings to update that for this season.

Without appearing to be too long winded, that rule is with regards riders who have never had an established MA, hence it does not mention 'assessed'. I believe other riders in a similar position have guested this season, but nobody has queried that? I don't want to drone on but what if a rider is riding on his converted CL MA and has that * by his name, have they ever not been able to guest? Next season that box will be changed as it is obviously misleading when it suits!"

Reading that last sentence, I wasn't sure wether to laugh or have a fit of hysterics :D

That’s brilliant.

it’s the exact same point I made on the Belle Vue Ipswich play off post & was shouted down the masses who knew better. The last sentence is pure gold

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said:

Here's the reply I received from the BSPA Office:

"You have quoted the rule yourself and it does not mention 'assessed', it says 'have an established MA' and Robert Lambert DOES have an established average, from 2019, he just hasn't done enough meetings to update that for this season.

Without appearing to be too long winded, that rule is with regards riders who have never had an established MA, hence it does not mention 'assessed'. I believe other riders in a similar position have guested this season, but nobody has queried that? I don't want to drone on but what if a rider is riding on his converted CL MA and has that * by his name, have they ever not been able to guest? Next season that box will be changed as it is obviously misleading when it suits!"

Reading that last sentence, I wasn't sure wether to laugh or have a fit of hysterics :D

Did whoever sent that not have a name? What a lot of bo....ks. Sums up why the sport is in the state it is.  Still helps those up North justify why they have reached where they are. Never mind, I am sure that the Sheffield management and fans can accept the situation and I guess they are proud of where they are at. Yes some Ipswich supporters clamoured for changes but CL runs the club his way. As many have said already who cares any longer and any true supporters in Suffolk will be at the Portman Road anyway, the witches are not that much of a pull compared to the tractor boys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AceBelle said:

it's a extra meeting they didn't expect to have so any income will be a bonus !! 

Nonsense. It’s an extra meeting they know they’ve now got before making the decision to cancel. There’s no way on gods green earth Chris Louis would cancel a meeting with a guaranteed biggest crowd of the season, to rearrange it on a date when the football team is playing and his gate receipts will take a massive hit. All because “he’s running scared of Chris Harris”? LOL. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Arch Stanton said:

Nonsense. It’s an extra meeting they know they’ve now got before making the decision to cancel. There’s no way on gods green earth Chris Louis would cancel a meeting with a guaranteed biggest crowd of the season, to rearrange it on a date when the football team is playing and his gate receipts will take a massive hit. All because “he’s running scared of Chris Harris”? LOL. 

They may ask Glasgow to postpone so Harris can ride at Ipswich, of course they may blame the weather forecast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said:

Here's the reply I received from the BSPA Office:

"You have quoted the rule yourself and it does not mention 'assessed', it says 'have an established MA' and Robert Lambert DOES have an established average, from 2019, he just hasn't done enough meetings to update that for this season.

Without appearing to be too long winded, that rule is with regards riders who have never had an established MA, hence it does not mention 'assessed'. I believe other riders in a similar position have guested this season, but nobody has queried that? I don't want to drone on but what if a rider is riding on his converted CL MA and has that * by his name, have they ever not been able to guest? Next season that box will be changed as it is obviously misleading when it suits!"

Reading that last sentence, I wasn't sure wether to laugh or have a fit of hysterics :D

The reg though states does the rider HAVE an established MA NOT has the rider EVER HAD an established MA

By the fact that the old MA is not considered suitable and needs to be reassessed Lambert no longer has an established MA

"When it suits" sums it up perfectly 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Arch Stanton said:

Nonsense. It’s an extra meeting they know they’ve now got before making the decision to cancel. There’s no way on gods green earth Chris Louis would cancel a meeting with a guaranteed biggest crowd of the season, to rearrange it on a date when the football team is playing and his gate receipts will take a massive hit. All because “he’s running scared of Chris Harris”? LOL. 

i never said they did that ? iv'e looked at weather forecast and it looks a genuine call/off for me i'm relating to whatever crowd turns up on tuesday is a free hit for them i believe it will be a healthy one despite the football ? but Louis did make a smart move knowing Harris unaviable which i'm glad for !! sheffield are win at all costs and are ok with the rules from last year used by us :nono:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

The reg though states does the rider HAVE an established MA NOT has the rider EVER HAD an established MA

By the fact that the old MA is not considered suitable and needs to be reassessed Lambert no longer has an established MA

"When it suits" sums it up perfectly 

Is that the same as in the best interest of speedway!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wonder how many more seasons the BSPA are going the let Lambert ride the last few meetings so he can keep his low false average. I guess adding his meetings from the last 2 seasons together to get a rolling average would be to hard for them to work out !!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 2ndbend said:

I just wonder how many more seasons the BSPA are going the let Lambert ride the last few meetings so he can keep his low false average. I guess adding his meetings from the last 2 seasons together to get a rolling average would be to hard for them to work out !!!!

I don't understand why play-off meetings are not included for averages.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Aries said:

Did you even type that with a straight face? It’s your promoter who clearly has a win at all costs attitude regardless of the integrity of his choices. Should we be surprised though? After all this is the bloke who insisted his nephew who wasn’t far off qualifying for a testimonial, should be eligible for a “rising star” role as he (wrongly as it turned out) assumed it would give his team a huge advantage!

How many times did Sheffield turn up to Ipswich without a certain Jack Holder as it made them stronger as he hated the place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy