Poole v Edinburgh Weds 27/09/23

[lbw]

28 minutes ago, Triple.H. said:

You have to have a Soya Milk one to show your full appreciation 

Ermmmmm, think I'll give that a miss 

 

[Toady]

3 hours ago, Bojangles said:

I'm not arguing that fact, it's a great run club and the speedway world would be much poorer without them. The 'banter' with them on the forum is what makes it fun most of the time. It would just be nice if some of them recognised the fact the sport wasn't invented in 1999.

Are you sure !

[Toady]

3 hours ago, BackInTheDHSS said:

I'd be a bit worried if I was @steve roberts with just how often you manage to shoehorn him into one your messages. So much so it wouldn't surprise me if you sent that from one of the bushes outside his house.

Zzzzzzzz

[Starman2006]

Anybody seen Trackprat, or is he still swimming ashore Glug glug glug 

[tyretrax]

10 hours ago, Skidder1 said:

In the modern era always within budget and always financially stable (except 2019!)

Depends on your budget though.

[edmon]

Why was the Starting Marshal not removed from the meeting when he failed to collect the tape stabliser from the track?  There is precedence for this when a similar thing happened at Workington a few years back.

[Trackrat]

13 hours ago, Starman2006 said:

Anybody seen Trackprat, or is he still swimming ashore Glug glug glug 

@Phil, spamming & personal name calling. He knows I can’t swim.

Edited September 29, 2023 by Trackrat

[Catalan]

2 hours ago, edmon said:

Why was the Starting Marshal not removed from the meeting when he failed to collect the tape stabliser from the track?  There is precedence for this when a similar thing happened at Workington a few years back.

Can I ask why he should be?

He was reprimanded so surely enough??

[edmon]

A reprimand, who from?  He failed to undertake one of his duties under regulation 02.2.12 f.  As an official he should have been treated as a rider would have been had he committed a very dangerous offence.  I would assume he, as well as receiving a reprimand, has also been reported to the SCB for them to take action.

[SteveLyric2]

3 hours ago, edmon said:

Why was the Starting Marshal not removed from the meeting when he failed to collect the tape stabliser from the track?  There is precedence for this when a similar thing happened at Workington a few years back.

The SCB Official ie the Referee, recorded the incident in his official Meeting report to the SCB. There are seperate rules and 'punishments'  in the SCB rules and regs. (quite apart from the stick he took from fans and colleagues)

Edited September 29, 2023 by Skidder1

[Arthur54]

2 hours ago, Trackrat said:

@Phil, spamming & personal name calling. He knows I can’t swim.

Glug glug glug then 

[geoff100]

4 hours ago, edmon said:

Why was the Starting Marshal not removed from the meeting when he failed to collect the tape stabliser from the track?  There is precedence for this when a similar thing happened at Workington a few years back.

Thats because it was a certain scottish ref who liked to make the show all about him,the late kenny fearon did well not to smack him for showing him up like he did !

[Trackrat]

55 minutes ago, Arthur54 said:

Glug glug glug then 

That’s about your spelling limit.

[Arthur54]

33 minutes ago, Trackrat said:

That’s about your spelling limit.

I take it you will be cheering the pirates on in the two cup finals 

[Wee Eck]

3 hours ago, edmon said:

A reprimand, who from?  He failed to undertake one of his duties under regulation 02.2.12 f.  As an official he should have been treated as a rider would have been had he committed a very dangerous offence.  I would assume he, as well as receiving a reprimand, has also been reported to the SCB for them to take action.

You seem to have a problem with this but I’m not sure why. The guy made a mistake, the mistake was spotted and action taken before any harm was done. This was nothing like “a rider….(who) had committed a very dangerous offence”. It wasn’t an offence, simply an error which, thank goodness, was spotted and resolved.

No doubt he’ll receive a reprimand from SCB and I doubt will ever repeat the mistake. 

[Starman2006]

1 hour ago, Trackrat said:

That’s about your spelling limit.

Prat.

[Nickinho]

9 minutes ago, Starman2006 said:

Prat.

Well you did deliberately goad him. You can't complain when he responds. 

[Trackrat]

1 hour ago, Starman2006 said:

Prat.

@Phil @21st century heathen again, constant name calling.

Edited September 29, 2023 by Trackrat

[Starman2006]

2 hours ago, Nickinho said:

Well you did deliberately goad him. You can't complain when he responds. 

What does he expect.  When somebody has a go at him he doesn't like it, but his constant, jibes over years, against us gets a little tiresome.
. To be honest i don't think he is even a speedway fan, he just jumped on the Poole hate bandwagon and clearly thinks he's clever.
When it backfires he cops a strop. Water off a ducks back. What goes around comes around.

Edited September 29, 2023 by Starman2006

[Trackrat]

17 minutes ago, Starman2006 said:

What does he expect.  When somebody has a go at him he doesn't like it, but his constant, jibes over years, against us gets a little tiresome.
. To be honest i don't think he is even a speedway fan, he just jumped on the Poole hate bandwagon and clearly thinks he's clever.
When it backfires he cops a strop. Water off a ducks back. What goes around comes around.

Reality is brainman I get banned for minor banter but the Poole fans can constantly call me names & nothing is done.

I am a speedway & grasstrack fan but admit I can’t abide Poole speedway because of the constant cheating for years.

If you don’t like that then kindly jog on.