Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Peterborough v Wolverhampton 11/09/23


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, StarBoy said:

Either way, it's not Busters fault at Lynn or Peterborough. The fact of the matter is, the man has contractual obligations to fulfil and that includes participating in every meeting that he is scheduled too. The fact that he/Wroclaw is skirting around the rules by using a contrived "injury" should not be permissible in any form. He is essentially "withholding services" without the ban. 

Of course, Buster probably shouldn't have been so naive to re-sign him with Peterborough as he does have previous, but whether Wroclaw have injuries or not, he still has a contractual obligation to Peterborough the same he does Wroclaw. 

Imagine if, for example the shoe was on the other foot, the Polish lawyers would be coming with their pitchforks full force at UK speedway. So I ask the question why is the SCB or whoever deals with these situations not doing anything about it? 

Whatever the whys and wherevers Buster is complicit in it even if not his doing/suggestion/instruction to Laguta that’s causing him to miss this meeting BECAUSE we all know only to well that Buster does not take kindly to any rider messing him about - ie the Holder/Batchelor fiasco!   
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not sure what people aren't quite understanding about this situation. If you have two jobs (doing the same trade) with two different companies and one of those employers is paying considerably more than the other you are going to do what that one is paying the most says. One of his employers had 15,000 in last night and his other will probably have 1,500 tonight. 

Artem didn’t ride like a man not committed last Monday and nor the previous Monday  when he got clean bowled yet got up and won the re run and then pulled out the meeting.

I agree some clarity on the situation would be nice but unfortunately that’s just business sometimes.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, maneacat said:

Whatever the whys and wherevers Buster is complicit in it even if not his doing/suggestion/instruction to Laguta that’s causing him to miss this meeting BECAUSE we all know only to well that Buster does not take kindly to any rider messing him about - ie the Holder/Batchelor fiasco!   
 

 

It might surprise some, coming from me (ahem Manecaat) :). But it does make you think.. Normally you would sit down with a riders manager, if we are talking that quality of rider, given what the Poles are like... Go through all the meetings and dates that the rider is going to be contracted to ride in, and then sign the deal. Obviously there's other things to negotiate, money spanner man, travel, hotels, van and more. But  you both know all the meetings your expected/ contracted to ride in. 

I don't know, but i'm thinking that this contract might not be your standard one. As you said ,would Buster hire AL if he missed those meetings for Lynn previously if under contract to ride in them.? Buster would of re negotiated with AL after Alex had left,  that's for sure. What that deal is we can only guess, until someone comes out and tells us:blink:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JoeW436 said:

I’m not sure what people aren't quite understanding about this situation. If you have two jobs (doing the same trade) with two different companies and one of those employers is paying considerably more than the other you are going to do what that one is paying the most says. One of his employers had 15,000 in last night and his other will probably have 1,500 tonight. 

Artem didn’t ride like a man not committed last Monday and nor the previous Monday  when he got clean bowled yet got up and won the re run and then pulled out the meeting.

I agree some clarity on the situation would be nice but unfortunately that’s just business sometimes.

But he’s contracted to ride for you, and his other job doesn’t clash with it. Ask Doyle, Sayfutdinov etc., it’s possible to do both. If he couldn’t commit to all meetings he shouldn’t have signed the contract. End of. It actually makes it less tricky for us tonight but I still think it’s wrong.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me Wroclaw need Laguta a hell of a lot more than he needs them, Woffinden, Wright, Janowski all picking up injuries.

What if Laguta said to Wroclaw "I've signed a contract to ride for Peterborough & I'm going to honour that contract" what can they do? Fine him, ban him from riding here (is that legal?) Then what if Laguta replies with "screw you, I won't race in the final for you then" would Wroclaw really throw away a chance at the league title - hell no!

I know top riders will pretty much do whatever the Polish clubs tell them due to the wages they are getting, but what's to stop them even "bluffing" that he won't ride for them if he can't ride for Peterborough? Even if he 100% plans to ride for Wroclaw anyway - they won't know that!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Bagpuss said:

Not really, I think its been a mixture of Buster telling him to sit meetings out as he couldn't afford to pay him and Wroclaw pulling rank and telling him to sit meetings out so he is fit for their matches. All down to money unfortunately, I genuinely believe that if it was up to the rider he wouldn't have missed any. 

I don't disagree that it's a disgrace though. 

Absolutely not, Wroclaw have called the shots from day 1.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Call me wolfie said:

But he’s contracted to ride for you, and his other job doesn’t clash with it. Ask Doyle, Sayfutdinov etc., it’s possible to do both. If he couldn’t commit to all meetings he shouldn’t have signed the contract. End of. It actually makes it less tricky for us tonight but I still think it’s wrong.

The Polish Clubs have to agree in writing that their rider can race for a UK club before a 1-7 can be approved. They can withdraw their consent as they see fit as in the example of Wonkyo.

This situation has been brought about from the start of this season, Wroclaw have been pulling Laguta's strings from day 1 and most of you have chosen to blame Chapman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, chrismorton said:

I fully understand that the Wroclaw meeting is more important but Its just the lies I don't like about an ankle injury...

It's whatever the medical certificate (bent doctor) says. Imagine being told "he" has an ankle injury then the medical certificate (bent doctor) forgets which rider is being invalidated and submits a medical certificate saying "food poisoning" to the controlling body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Byker Biker said:

The Polish Clubs have to agree in writing that their rider can race for a UK club before a 1-7 can be approved. They can withdraw their consent as they see fit as in the example of Wonkyo.

This situation has been brought about from the start of this season, Wroclaw have been pulling Laguta's strings from day 1 and most of you have chosen to blame Chapman.

Not under Alex they wasn't. Can't say the same under Buster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy