Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Wolves v Lions 4/9 P R2


Col

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Hawk127 said:

What a contrived result. Still that sums up the sport. Form suggests it should not be but but no doubt no one will ever prove what a load of crap this sport has become with results like this. Stage managed or what. 

Keep going, you might get another bite...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Fullmax said:

Let's hope not

Can't see anything other than that tbh.

BV will pick Leicester and the Lions won't be able to tame BV enough around the NSS.

Sheffield will have to go to Wolves with Holder who hates the place, Vissing who's out of his depth and potentially Woffinden who won't be anywhere near fit enough to ride the tight and technical Monmore circuit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TTT said:

Can't see anything other than that tbh.

BV will pick Leicester and the Lions won't be able to tame BV enough around the NSS.

Sheffield will have to go to Wolves with Holder who hates the place, Vissing who's out of his depth and potentially Woffinden who won't be anywhere near fit enough to ride the tight and technical Monmore circuit. 

No picks this year, surely? First v fourth, second v third?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Hawk127 said:

What a contrived result. Still that sums up the sport. Form suggests it should not be but but no doubt no one will ever prove what a load of crap this sport has become with results like this. Stage managed or what. 

Not sure about that. Wolves recent  home form has been pathetic . Ipswich only have themselves to blame if they miss out. Shouldn't have lost at Monmore recently. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Hawk127 said:

What a contrived result. Still that sums up the sport. Form suggests it should not be but but no doubt no one will ever prove what a load of crap this sport has become with results like this. Stage managed or what. 

You obviously weren’t there, no way could heat 15 have been fixed, absolutely no way, Sam was fuming also.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, TTT said:

Can't see anything other than that tbh.

BV will pick Leicester and the Lions won't be able to tame BV enough around the NSS.

Sheffield will have to go to Wolves with Holder who hates the place, Vissing who's out of his depth and potentially Woffinden who won't be anywhere near fit enough to ride the tight and technical Monmore circuit. 

Don’t think there is any picking of opponents in the play offs this year, one plays four and two plays three.

Holder is no longer a member of the team, Tai replaced him and the rule from last year allowing replacements for long term injuries to riders has been dropped following the number of complaints after Aces signed Robert..  not sure what Tigers can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, RoundTheBoards said:

Has the interest in the closeness of the battle for the 4th play-off place crashed the BSPL website?

For some reason it’s always in a ropey state on a Monday night after the results for an hour or so 

 

well done Leicester probably just done enough now 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SPD444 said:

Don’t think there is any picking of opponents in the play offs this year, one plays four and two plays three.

Holder is no longer a member of the team, Tai replaced him and the rule from last year allowing replacements for long term injuries to riders has been dropped following the number of complaints after Aces signed Robert..  not sure what Tigers can do.

He means Chris Holder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SPD444 said:

No, I mean Jack. Same as last year when Robert replaced Max in the Aces team.

The post you commented/quoted on, stated holder hates monmore, that Holder was Chris, they never mentioned Jack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, I quite enjoyed that, generally don't enjoy the racing at Monmore but went as it was the last league match.

Wolves were generally poor, S Worrall started well but tailed off.  Becker, Masters & Douglas started slow but did enough.  Cook, Schlein Flint I expected more from.

Leicester had Fricke who was outstanding & Kemp who did a job, but did throw points away.  Kerr rode well, Sedgeman & Allen were largely anonymous.  Lawson was excluded on grounds I didn't believe existed started well but faded but then got the job done in the super heat

Who'm I missing... oh R Worrall, did better than I expected but shouldn't have gifted passing opportunities to the Wolves duo in heat 14.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lions were well up for it tonight as they regularly hit the first turn in front.

Wolves had another one of those home meetings where they struggled somewhat.


I’m not a big fan of the super heat but if it is to stay I hope we can get rid of the extra point on offer as I feel there should never be more than 3 points earned between the teams for the second leg of a league match.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Fullmax said:

Glad to see Wolves come up short. Farcical points gained in recent weeks , a  reward for  not being good enough to win their home meetings. Whatever happens next year get rid of this extra heat.

Make your mine up ! You say Wolves have gained farcical points through the superheat but then are happy that they came up short via the exact same system ! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Beowulf said:

Make your mine up ! You say Wolves have gained farcical points through the superheat but then are happy that they came up short via the exact same 

Why do you think you deserve the chance of  an extra point for not being good enough to win home meetings? 

Got what they deserved. Should be 1pt to each team. The only time a Super heat should ever be needed is when the aggregate scores are level. 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Fullmax said:

Why do you think you deserve the chance of  an extra point for not being good enough to win home meetings? 

Got what they deserved. Should be 1pt to each team. The only time a Super heat should ever be needed is when the aggregate scores are level. 

 

Strangley I agree with you. It's the American idea that there should be no such thing as a draw. On the other hand I am sure some fans have enjoyed getting another heat thrown in  for 'free'.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy