Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Robert Lambert, play-off guest


Recommended Posts

It just dawned on me that Lambert could guest for an injured rider in the play-offs. He'd be especially useful on a 7.81 average.

Of course you never want to see a rider injured & hope he won't be needed, but I can almost imagine the reaction if a Belle Vue rider got injured & Lambert guested for them against Sheffield to win the final!

Edited by szkocjasid
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, szkocjasid said:

It just dawned on me that Lambert could guest for an injured rider in the play-offs. He'd be especially useful on a 7.81 average.

Of course you never want to see a rider injured & hope he won't be needed, but I can almost imagine the reaction if a Belle Vue rider got injured & Lambert guested for them against Sheffield to win the final!

Though it would be by the rules again I could see certain promoters trying to circumnavigate those rules again if they thought it would help them win against an opponent (and rider) suffering with injuries. Yuck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, szkocjasid said:

It just dawned on me that Lambert could guest for an injured rider in the play-offs. He'd be especially useful on a 7.81 average.

Of course you never want to see a rider injured & hope he won't be needed, but I can almost imagine the reaction if a Belle Vue rider got injured & Lambert guested for them against Sheffield to win the final!

The reaction will be...

"That's perfectly acceptable because it is within the rules"..

"Unlike last year, when, it was, errrrrrr, also within the rules"...

"But I didn't like it"...

" Dribble, Dribble"..

An unnatached rider coming in? Not Acceptable

A rider coming in who has already been knocked out of the competition his scoring has influenced? Perfectly Acceptable..

:D

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikebv said:

The reaction will be...

"That's perfectly acceptable because it is within the rules"..

"Unlike last year, when, it was, errrrrrr, also within the rules"...

"But I didn't like it"...

" Dribble, Dribble"..

An unnatached rider coming in? Not Acceptable

A rider coming in who has already been knocked out of the competition his scoring has influenced? Perfectly Acceptable..

:D

Just shows how bonkers the rules and the sport has become. I’m a tigers and aces fan but can not accept what happened last season as right. It’s a joke. This ridiculous situation doesn’t happen in any other professional sport. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Speedtiger said:

Just shows how bonkers the rules and the sport has become. I’m a tigers and aces fan but can not accept what happened last season as right. It’s a joke. This ridiculous situation doesn’t happen in any other professional sport. 

I can't think of any other team sports that don't have squads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikebv said:

The reaction will be...

"That's perfectly acceptable because it is within the rules"..

"Unlike last year, when, it was, errrrrrr, also within the rules"...

"But I didn't like it"...

" Dribble, Dribble"..

An unnatached rider coming in? Not Acceptable

A rider coming in who has already been knocked out of the competition his scoring has influenced? Perfectly Acceptable..

:D

The rules have been changed from last year meaning you cannot sign a full team member and HAVE to rely on guests. The cartel wants a crazy situation where Belle Vue if hit badly by injuries could have Peterborough step in. 

1 Chris Harris

2 R/R

3 Ben Basso

4 Ben Cook

5 Niels Kristian Iversen

6 Simon Lambert

7 Jack Smith

Any organisation that legislates for that is nuts especially when you consider The Aces could put out a fully contracted team, off the top of my head of

1 Zmarzlik 

2 Berge 

3 Zagar

4 Etheridge

5 Tungate

6 Bellego

7 Mulford (if fit by then)

The people running (ruining) this sport and BSF that back them are crazy.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the latest green sheets Robert is down as an assessed average rider, marked by a *. https://britishspeedway.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/p23_issue_26.pdf

Rule 010.2 states

“ A Premiership Assessed League rider will establish an MA after completing 3 home and 3 away qualifying fixtures”.

Kings Lynn only have 2 home fixtures left so if we follow the rule book then he will not get a new average and remain assessed. 

He therefore cannot guest due to the rule book 

012.4.2 Guest Rider (G)

“c) the guest must be in a current team declaration and have an established MA”.

I thought Robert would come back and have his average just roll but it seems that’s not the case. 
 

http://www.scbgb.co.uk/download.php?view.10304

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ouch said:

Looking at the latest green sheets Robert is down as an assessed average rider, marked by a *. https://britishspeedway.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/p23_issue_26.pdf

Rule 010.2 states

“ A Premiership Assessed League rider will establish an MA after completing 3 home and 3 away qualifying fixtures”.

Kings Lynn only have 2 home fixtures left so if we follow the rule book then he will not get a new average and remain assessed. 

He therefore cannot guest due to the rule book 

012.4.2 Guest Rider (G)

“c) the guest must be in a current team declaration and have an established MA”.

I thought Robert would come back and have his average just roll but it seems that’s not the case. 
 

http://www.scbgb.co.uk/download.php?view.10304

 

It’s because his average is more than two years old I believe. Same applies to Tai at Sheffield for example. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ben91 said:

It’s because his average is more than two years old I believe. Same applies to Tai at Sheffield for example. 

Yes, that is correct. In fact the ruling has changed as in 21 and 22 it was just older than the previous season. I don't know why Craig Cook's average is marked as assessed, though,  having ridden for Sheffield the first part of last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert uses his 2019 average and they consider it assessed. 

Jaimon uses his 2019 average and they consider it NOT assessed. 

Robert signs last year complete with 2.5% Brits reduction 7.81 down to 7.61

Robert signs this year WITHOUT the Brit reduction 7.81. 

They make it up as they go along.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tocha said:

Yes, that is correct. In fact the ruling has changed as in 21 and 22 it was just older than the previous season. I don't know why Craig Cook's average is marked as assessed, though,  having ridden for Sheffield the first part of last season.

Cooks average is his 2023 Champ ave converted, but will become a rolling ave in September!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ouch said:

Robert uses his 2019 average and they consider it assessed. 

Jaimon uses his 2019 average and they consider it NOT assessed. 

Robert signs last year complete with 2.5% Brits reduction 7.81 down to 7.61

Robert signs this year WITHOUT the Brit reduction 7.81

They make it up as they go along.

Lambert's average being different than last year confused me greatly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, szkocjasid said:

Cooks average is his 2023 Champ ave converted, but will become a rolling ave in September!

Craig Cook had a 2022 PL average 5.05 which wasn’t used when signing for Leicester. He used his Championship average 8.94 divided by 1.5 = 5.96

Ben Barker had a 2022 PL average 4.42 which was used when signing for Ipswich. His Championship average 7.80 divided by 1.5 = 5.20 wasn’t used. 

This has happened with other riders like Simon Lambert and Drew Kemp. It’s fair to say there is zero consistency in the application of the rules. 

The decision on whether an average is deemed assessed seem completely arbitrary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ouch said:

Robert uses his 2019 average and they consider it assessed. 

Jaimon uses his 2019 average and they consider it NOT assessed. 

Robert signs last year complete with 2.5% Brits reduction 7.81 down to 7.61

Robert signs this year WITHOUT the Brit reduction 7.81. 

They make it up as they go along.

 

They absolutely do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ouch said:

Robert uses his 2019 average and they consider it assessed. 

Jaimon uses his 2019 average and they consider it NOT assessed. 

Robert signs last year complete with 2.5% Brits reduction 7.81 down to 7.61

Robert signs this year WITHOUT the Brit reduction 7.81. 

They make it up as they go along.

 

Of course they do...

They have regulations. ..

Then, regularly, along comes something that, when the regulations are followed, kicks out a situation that the vast majority then say...

"That cannot be correct"....

Hence we often have contradictory decisions being made, that go against any custom and practice...

Often "in the interest of Speedway"..

A more, less suitable phrase, it would be hard to iimagine, as this alone will alienate so many fans..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy