Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

King's Lynn v Ippo 17/08/23


Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Bald Bloke said:

There must be more to it imo. Not just TJ and NK out. Otherwise they would have been made to run it.

Why must there be more to it and why is it always Lynn and Buster with the drama? Who else has postponed meetings for any reason other than the weather? The bloke lies about heart attacks, lies about broken pit gates because he’s missing a few Danish lads, and has form (as shown above) for postponing meetings in the past for not legitimate reasons for postponing meetings! The bloke is a pi$$ taker pure and simple. 

34 minutes ago, Bagpuss said:

I don't think this is comparable though.....they've gone to the BSPL/Phil Morris and sought permission to postpone. I'd agree with Ipswich being awarded the points if that's what had been decided, but at the same time season ticket holders and the riders themselves (particularly those on fat guarantees) lose out. Sanctions had to happen in order to deter clubs doing it in the future. I think the chances are miniscule but if Lynn were to win the restating then Ippo would have every right to be mightily peed off. 

Definitely feel that there is something we're not being told as one guest and R/R isn't enough to cancel. But it's pretty clear we've never been told the truth about Laguta's absences. 

That’s Busters problem and down to him to reimburse those affected! You don’t run the meeting you forfeit the meeting simple as that. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, iainb said:

Used to be 30 points team average or something like that

So you just submit a team that is under that and say anyone else is unavailable? It's not like the BSPL can ring every available rider and check 

It's simple the fixture goes ahead or Ipswich are awarded the points 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FromBendThree said:

Don’t forget Keith Chapman was not planning to run Kings Lynn this year nor was he expecting to have to bail them out. 

What’s that got to do with him postponing this meeting because he’s missing a couple of riders? Totally irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Aries said:

Why must there be more to it and why is it always Lynn and Buster with the drama? Who else has postponed meetings for any reason other than the weather? The bloke lies about heart attacks, lies about broken pit gates because he’s missing a few Danish lads, and has form (as shown above) for postponing meetings in the past for not legitimate reasons for postponing meetings! The bloke is a pi$$ taker pure and simple. 

That’s Busters problem and down to him to reimburse those affected! You don’t run the meeting you forfeit the meeting simple as that. 

More to it... Because the postponement wouldn't of been allowed with 2 riders missing imo. Wouldn't you agree?

This crap was put on Buster, for no fault of his own (this time). Brady was running the show, picking the riders and doing the deals and paying them.. He had to jack, and that left Buster in the crap, with an overpriced team, he can't afford.  TJ out ,Klindt out and Barker breaks his collarbone. On top of any problems the might or might not be with Laguta. He could of said fook it and shut both clubs down..

Although a bit of transparency wouldn't go amiss here.

Edited by Bald Bloke
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bald Bloke said:

More to it... Because the postponement wouldn't of been allowed with 2 riders missing imo. Wouldn't you agree?

This crap was put on Buster, for no fault of his own (this time). Brady was running the show, picking the riders and doing the deals and paying them.. He had to jack, and that left Buster in the crap, with an overpriced team, he can't afford.  TJ out ,Klindt out and Barker breaks his collarbone. On top of any problems the might or might not be with Laguta. He could of said fook it and shut both clubs down..

Although a bit of transparency wouldn't go amiss here.

Transparency & Buster, those magic mushrooms must have kicked in lol.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sir Sidney said:

Exactly that. 

Part of Phil Morris' role was to ensure there was transparency. 

Here is a perfect opportunity for transparency and it's been fudged as usual. 

I wonder how much authority he truly has , and whether he is just there to ensure the tv meetings run smoothly. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, proud panther said:

Transparency & Buster, those magic mushrooms must have kicked in lol.

If he had been. I think in this case ( i said this case) some people might of understood what he was up against since Alex went. And maybe some might ( i said might) of felt  just a teny weeny bit sympathetic to this situation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, FromBendThree said:

Don’t forget Keith Chapman was not planning to run Kings Lynn this year nor was he expecting to have to bail them out. 

You are correct Brady and Dale Allett have a whole lot to answer for the mess the club is in especially Brady 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, proud panther said:

Exactly, guests can always be found, & the money he would have saved if Laguta was missing would have paid for decent guests & R/R for Laguta. Another nail in the coffin of British speedway.

Guests are a fundamental "must have" at a majority of meetings anyway aren't they so what difference would it have made tonight? 

It doesn't really matter who wins anyway does it? 

Maybe this is (another) of those "one offs" and won't happen again...?

(Again)....:rolleyes::D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Haza said:

You are correct Brady and Dale Allett have a whole lot to answer for the mess the club is in especially Brady 

I think he is trying to get to the end of the season, and see if a new promoter can be found. Rather than shut it down now.

Edited by Bald Bloke
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, FromBendThree said:

As I said earlier, this episode could mean the Stars don’t get to complete the season. Who suffers most of they are expunged?

I'm hoping this is in someway helping to get to the end of the season somehow. Well I hope so.

Edited by Bald Bloke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy