Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

SCB's excuse for Artem Laguta


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, 2ndbendbeerhut said:

Wonder what would happen if there was no guest facilities.... 

They would have a fit for purpose R/R operating model? 

They would have less riders per team to create a surplus of unattached "subs on the bench"?

They would stop running meetings on nights when they 100% know key riders who should be there are already booked to be elsewhere, or, are likely to be elsewhere as they have made it clear at the start of the season that they are pursuing individual ambitions, eg GP Challenge qualifying, U21, U19 domestic and world qualifiers etc?

They wouldnt be agreeing so readily to meetings where they know they would be allowed to improve their team by bringing in a better rider on a higher average, or a better rider at a specific track?

They wouldn't have such ridicule based on much of the nonsense and manipulation that is allowed to pervade by having guests in the first place? 

The sport may be taken seriously by the wider media and fans?

Sponsors may come on board to support credible sporting contests? 

Ex fans who still closely follow the sport may start to return? 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mikebv said:

They would have a fit for purpose R/R operating model? 

They would have less riders per team to create a surplus of unattached "subs on the bench"?

They would stop running meetings on nights when they 100% know key riders who should be there are already booked to be elsewhere, or, are likely to be elsewhere as they have made it clear at the start of the season that they are pursuing individual ambitions, eg GP Challenge qualifying, U21, U19 domestic and world qualifiers etc?

They wouldnt be agreeing so readily to meetings where they know they would be allowed to improve their team by bringing in a better rider on a higher average, or a better rider at a specific track?

They wouldn't have such ridicule based on much of the nonsense and manipulation that is allowed to pervade by having guests in the first place? 

The sport may be taken seriously by the wider media and fans?

Sponsors may come on board to support credible sporting contests? 

Ex fans who still closely follow the sport may start to return? 

Bravo!  That's the clearest explanation I've seen for a new/different operating model that might just work.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, mikebv said:

They would have a fit for purpose R/R operating model? 

They would have less riders per team to create a surplus of unattached "subs on the bench"?

They would stop running meetings on nights when they 100% know key riders who should be there are already booked to be elsewhere, or, are likely to be elsewhere as they have made it clear at the start of the season that they are pursuing individual ambitions, eg GP Challenge qualifying, U21, U19 domestic and world qualifiers etc?

They wouldnt be agreeing so readily to meetings where they know they would be allowed to improve their team by bringing in a better rider on a higher average, or a better rider at a specific track?

They wouldn't have such ridicule based on much of the nonsense and manipulation that is allowed to pervade by having guests in the first place? 

The sport may be taken seriously by the wider media and fans?

Sponsors may come on board to support credible sporting contests? 

Ex fans who still closely follow the sport may start to return? 

 

 

Whilst we might like the “subs on the bench” idea as apposed to the guest system, it’s just not going to happen. The powers that be rewrote the rule book to stop it when teams are faced with injuries, at a time when the sport in this country gets its greatest exposure. It’s also evident, given posts on the subject that BSF are dead against the idea and prefer guests. 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belle Vue “Can we sign a number one even though he doesn’t want to do all the away meetings?”

Cartel “No”

Kings Lynn “Can we sign a number one even though he doesn’t want to do all the away meetings?”

Cartel “Yes”

Don’t agree with it btw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ouch said:

Belle Vue “Can we sign a number one  Robert Lambert even though he doesn’t want to do all the away meetings?”

Cartel “No”

Belle Vue: We've got lawyers

Cartel: oh well 

Kings Lynn “Can we sign a number one even though he doesn’t want to do all the away meetings?”

Cartel “Yes, remember what happened with Belle Vue

Don’t agree with it btw. 

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, arnieg said:

Belle Vue “Can we sign a number one  Robert Lambert even though he doesn’t want to do all the away meetings?”

Cartel “No”

Belle Vue: We've got lawyers

Cartel: oh well 

Kings Lynn “Can we sign a number one even though he doesn’t want to do all the away meetings?”

Cartel “Yes, remember what happened with Belle Vue

Don’t agree with it btw. 

The double standards are breath-taking :rofl:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Bald Bloke said:

Just the truth is all we want.

Whether Buster inherited the deal from Alex, or this has come from Lagtua/ Poland. Or has Buster felt he had to do it to keep running to the end of the season. Any of those 3 isn't  really damming on Buster in fairness. Well 2 out of 3 deffo ain't any fault of Buster. The 3rd  might of been either that, or close now.   The transparency is whats needed here from Buster . Not being honest It's giving people the chance to get on his back.. again ..Honesty  goes a long way imho.

I think your question has been answered in the Press Release of May 24th 

http://www.kingslynn-speedway.com/news.php?extend.31349

i.e. “All of the financial and team matters at King’s Lynn are taken on by Alex Brady and Dale Allitt, although obviously I still have responsibility for the stadium."

That clearly indicated where responsibility lies for any agreements re the Team, therefore as the stadium owner he has inherited any issues and problems leaving him to deal with them however he is able to. I note that "financial" matters specifically were not his responsibility. It leaves me thinking he has been left to pick up the financial sh*tty stick after those that have dropped it!

Edited by Fatfingers
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Fatfingers said:

I think your question has been answered in the Press Release of May 24th 

http://www.kingslynn-speedway.com/news.php?extend.31349

i.e. “All of the financial and team matters at King’s Lynn are taken on by Alex Brady and Dale Allitt, although obviously I still have responsibility for the stadium."

That clearly indicated where responsibility lies for any agreements re the Team, therefore as the stadium owner he has inherited any issues and problems leaving him to deal with them however he is able to. I note that "financial" matters specifically were not his responsibility. It leaves me thinking he has been left to pick up the financial sh*tty stick after those that have dropped it!

I read that when it came out. Unless I'm missing something, that tells us that Alex did the Laguta deal, as we all know. But what it don't tell us is since Alex did the deal, has Laguta/ Poland or Buster re gigged the deal. Or was it  in fact Alex's original deal, and hasn't been changed at all. 

What did cross my mine is that being as you appeared around the same time as David Haggart, you are close to it all, and know what happened :). Sorry if i'm miles away :t:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Bald Bloke said:

I read that when it came out. Unless I'm missing something, that tells us that Alex did the Laguta deal, as we all know. But what it don't tell us is since Alex did the deal, has Laguta/ Poland or Buster re gigged the deal. Or was it  in fact Alex's original deal, and hasn't been changed at all. 

What did cross my mine is that being as you appeared around the same time as David Haggart, you are close to it all, and know what happened :). Sorry if i'm miles away :t:

Miles away; just reading up on it and that seemed to be a logical conclusion. 

I do enjoy a forum discussion but like to follow the evidence, if it is there.

Edited by Fatfingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Speedway Star this week (another excellent publication), Alex Brady in a very good, honest interview, mentions the £10k a match thrown about on here..

And states it wasn't even half that but as a "world champion" he (quite rightly), doesn't come cheap..

He also said that the "TV money" basically paid for Artem....

Edited by mikebv
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy