Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

BV vs. Panthers 24/04/23


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, scoobydoo said:

Your obcessed with TTT posts you must sit there all day waiting for him to post something then post the same thing over and over and over again,  hes got a different opinion of Buster to you so you just need to accept that he has , if Buster shuts up shop so be it,  at least we might get some peace from reading on Peterborough's thread your repeated rants at MT a man you dont know 

I know we have different opinions . I’m not obsessed at all. I get peed off seeing the same things said over and over slagging Buster off, buts that’s ok, isn’t it? When I see that over and over I will  reply. Works both ways.Anyway I got to go ,TTT is on the move…

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, scoobydoo said:

Your obcessed with TTT posts you must sit there all day waiting for him to post something then post the same thing over and over and over again,  hes got a different opinion of Buster to you so you just need to accept that he has , if Buster shuts up shop so be it,  at least we might get some peace from reading on Peterborough's thread your repeated rants at MT a man you dont know 

Quite refreshing to have an alternative viewpoint though, it's all a bit anti Buster. The truth in my experience is usually somewhere in the middle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JoeW436 said:

Belle Vue by how ever many points they want, no one else seems to be arsed so neither can I 

Spoiler Alert!

It doesnt really matter who wins any UK Speedway League given the lack of financial return, publicity and kudos..

The Promoters themselves must realise this as they make it blatantly obvious just by looking at their ludicrous operating model....

Therefore 100%, and quite correctly, they will make the right decision for their clubs financially..

Hence over the years, for example, the No1 (world class), riders have often missed away meetings when riding elsewhere on the same night/next night, but have seldom missed home meetings..

Another example of why it shouldn't be teated seriously is the way you are allowed to bring in a better rider as a guest at home to replace your missing inferior one...

But have to run with a "lesser rider" away.. 

(The caveat being you may be able to bring in a track specialist ringer on a lower average)..;)

Winning it hone, plus seeing out a season and being in a position to come to the tapes the following year are pretty much the two key objectives...

Most fans go to watch the racing and plenty of clubs have enough "die hards" to cobble together some tenuous team event each week..

Whilst that exists, fair play to the promoters to look after their own business as they see fit..

No point winning a competition that brings in such miniiscule tangible reward, and then closing down because it cost you too much to do it..

The racing at the NSS will be no doubt excellent tomorrow, so that is what should hopefully bring the crowd in..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pleasureboy60 said:

Or the fact that King wants too much per point which we all know Chapman won't even consider. He's a total arsehole and wish he would just f**k off

Danny King's in form and he would give us a better points return than R/R will and that would result in Buster having to splash out an extra few hundred quid.

He's only going to book his KL flops to guest for us imo because he knows in advance that they'll give us a crap points return which won't cost him too much money.

I fully agree.

1 hour ago, RoundTheBoards said:

Should be fined for fielding an understrength team, as used to be the case.

Chapman should have to pay 50% of the total points money for the whole match regardless of the score.

Exactly, No reason why BV should have to lose a few thousand pounds tomorrow night all because Buster straight up refuses to sign a replacement and put out a 7 man team.

Should be forced into covering 25% of BV's wage bill minimum to cover up the managements loss of income on the night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TTT said:

Danny King's in form and he would give us a better points return than R/R will and that would result in Buster having to splash out an extra few hundred quid.

He's only going to book his KL flops to guest for us imo because he knows in advance that they'll give us a crap points return which won't cost him too much money.

I fully agree.

Exactly, No reason why BV should have to lose a few thousand pounds tomorrow night all because Buster straight up refuses to sign a replacement and put out a 7 man team.

Should be forced into covering 25% of BV's wage bill minimum to cover up the managements loss of income on the night.

What nonsense.

If BV want to spend thousands on expensive riders, they should pay the bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Bagpuss said:

Quite refreshing to have an alternative viewpoint though, it's all a bit anti Buster. The truth in my experience is usually somewhere in the middle.

Alternative viewpoint is ok but not when its been made so many times you can nearly remember all the words in order everytime he posts 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, scoobydoo said:

Alternative viewpoint is ok but not when its been made so many times you can nearly remember all the words in order everytime he posts 

Well we all have the ignore facility and its your perogative to use it if you wish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully understand why many think Peterborough will get battered but this is the best & fair track in Britain. 

Doesn't matter what teams turn up to the NSS, Belle Vue could be beaten. It's all about 'on the day'. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BassoRacingFan said:

What nonsense.

If BV want to spend thousands on expensive riders, they should pay the bills.

Why are you quoting yourself and talking to yourself. 
 

men in white coats on the way 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Haza said:

I seem to remember clubs used it get fined for fielding an under strength side which Pboro clearly is have to feel for tracks Pboro visit this season not sure what the answer is Buster definitely operates pboro and Lynn on a tight budget which has done for years he won’t pay what he considers is above the odds - sad thing for Pboro fans in what could be there last season it will be remembered for the wrong reasons .
 

Peterborough aren't fielding an under strength side, they are built to the points limit & using r/r for a missing rider, no one could possibly prove that King would outscore r/r! Assuming Sayfutdinov isn't available, this is the strongest team available to them (until they sign a new number one).

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, szkocjasid said:

Peterborough aren't fielding an under strength side, they are built to the points limit & using r/r for a missing rider, no one could possibly prove that King would outscore r/r! Assuming Sayfutdinov isn't available, this is the strongest team available to them (until they sign a new number one).

We need to see 7 rider teams 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy