Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Stars v Wolves 13/4


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Bagpuss said:

With all due respect if we get comfortably beaten at home by Wolves then we are in for some real wallopings by all the other teams.

Can see any team winning with there with the current 1-7 in fairness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, therefused said:

Especially if you have a guest with a two point higher average again!

Dont rate this Wolves team at all so I am going for 50-40. 

They didn't, Becker is in the declared 1-7...

https://britishspeedway.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/p23_issue_4.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, noaksey said:

I'm turning out for this.

Wolves struggling for a guest with only Sheffield not riding so Ellis, Bellego, Howarth or Kerr...

Unless Nicholls is fit of course..

Narrow away win

Wolves website says they have reverted to original declaration to ensure cover for Luke for foreseeable future so sounds like Nicholls won't be available for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, therefused said:

Especially if you have a guest with a two point higher average again!

Dont rate this Wolves team at all so I am going for 50-40. 

Becker is back in the declared 1-7 from yesterdays new averages so it’s absolutely correct we use a guest with a 7 point average. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stevebrum said:

Becker is back in the declared 1-7 from yesterdays new averages so it’s absolutely correct we use a guest with a 7 point average. 

Arent you the one always complaining about Lambert signing for Belle Vue which was perfectly legal? Whats the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, therefused said:

Arent you the one always complaining about Lambert signing for Belle Vue which was perfectly legal? Whats the difference?

Becker was declared in the 1-7 and got injured. He is back in the 1-7 declared line up. Perfectly legal.

Using a ringer just for the play offs outside the transfer window (which was why it got rejected first time) has never been allowed before yet suddenly it is. Yea, perfectly within the rules (depending who asks of course).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stevebrum said:

Becker was declared in the 1-7 and got injured. He is back in the 1-7 declared line up. Perfectly legal.

Using a ringer just for the play offs outside the transfer window (which was why it got rejected first time) has never been allowed before yet suddenly it is. Yea, perfectly within the rules (depending who asks of course).

they are/were both perfectly legal, doesn't mean either of them are correct

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, therefused said:

they are/were both perfectly legal, doesn't mean either of them are correct

Bringing an injured rider back into the declared 1 - 7 seems perfectly legal to me, the timing of course is a different issue.

Sadly the Lambert situation has opened a can of worms to allow ringers being brought in just for the play offs to win the title. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stevebrum said:

Bringing an injured rider back into the declared 1 - 7 seems perfectly legal to me, the timing of course is a different issue.

Sadly the Lambert situation has opened a can of worms to allow ringers being brought in just for the play offs to win the title. 

"Seems perfectly legal"

Let's face it, both of these situations are the sort of thing that Morris should be sorting out.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stevebrum said:

Bringing an injured rider back into the declared 1 - 7 seems perfectly legal to me, the timing of course is a different issue.

Sadly the Lambert situation has opened a can of worms to allow ringers being brought in just for the play offs to win the title. 

But every team brings ringers in all season to make it to the play offs (eg Bomber last night instead of Scott,)..

I mean Becker not Scott (cough cough)...

So why should the play offs be any different...

Just use the tried and trusted ringer operating model all through the season.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mikebv said:

But every team brings ringers in all season to make it to the play offs (eg Bomber last night instead of Scott,)..

I mean Becker not Scott (cough cough)...

So why should the play offs be any different...

Just use the tried and trusted ringer operating model all through the season.

 

Used to happen every season however since riders don’t want to ride over here like they used to and the lack of available decent riders the ringer system seems to now be saved for just the play offs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy