Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Season Tickets


Recommended Posts

Could argue the bigger mistake was in announcing 2h/2a before it was ratified

Can see more reasons against it than for imo 

- Trying to protect the ndl 

- teams that lose money per meeting lose less

- riders that couldn’t commit to 2h/2a leaving the championship 

- lower average attendance when same opposition visit multiple times 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, gmuncie said:

Could argue the bigger mistake was in announcing 2h/2a before it was ratified

Can see more reasons against it than for imo 

- Trying to protect the ndl 

- teams that lose money per meeting lose less

- riders that couldn’t commit to 2h/2a leaving the championship 

- lower average attendance when same opposition visit multiple times 

 

I’m not sure how having less meetings protect the NDL?

totally agree that the reality is that clubs running at a loss need to try and maintain there losses to a minimum.

again on the lower attendances, not sure if who your home team is racing apart from the number of away fans that’ll show up affects the attendance figures. What does affect attendances is 8 week bloody gaps in the season.

Again I think for riders the more meetings that can be offered result in the more potential pay days, which would do the opposite and make the championship more attractive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cast1rn said:

I’m not sure how having less meetings protect the NDL?

totally agree that the reality is that clubs running at a loss need to try and maintain there losses to a minimum.

again on the lower attendances, not sure if who your home team is racing apart from the number of away fans that’ll show up affects the attendance figures. What does affect attendances is 8 week bloody gaps in the season.

Again I think for riders the more meetings that can be offered result in the more potential pay days, which would do the opposite and make the championship more attractive. 

By having twice as many CL meetings it meant they couldn't fit all the NDL matches in if clubs ran two teams (without having to run Double Headers), apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StevePark said:

By having twice as many CL meetings it meant they couldn't fit all the NDL matches in if clubs ran two teams (without having to run Double Headers), apparently.

Or would it maybe be that running an NDL team  (think it’s 7 in the league this year I may be wrong)would mean they would have to run 10 league matches instead of 2 where they couldn’t charge for double header tickets. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Cast1rn said:

I’m not sure how having less meetings protect the NDL?

totally agree that the reality is that clubs running at a loss need to try and maintain there losses to a minimum.

again on the lower attendances, not sure if who your home team is racing apart from the number of away fans that’ll show up affects the attendance figures. What does affect attendances is 8 week bloody gaps in the season.

Again I think for riders the more meetings that can be offered result in the more potential pay days, which would do the opposite and make the championship more attractive. 

To go point by point 

- less Champ fixtures  protects ndl as allows clubs to have teams in both, nobody wants to run double headers these are proven loss makers 

- I won’t argue that lack of continuity in fixtures will harm attendances but having the same team multiple times does this also (unless for cup Finals / play offs etc) while your weekly diehards will go regardless the more irregular fan is less likely to go to a fixture if they know they have another opportunity to see them or vice versa wont bother the second time I’ve seen attendance figures to back this up. 

- for some riders more fixtures the better but for those with other commitments that’s not always the case. Erik Riss originally was going to sit out champ this year as it was to much, Josh Pickering said he considered the same. Then others like Ben Basso had originally said they would only do 1 uk league. That probably would still have been Glasgow I would guess but who knows may have been Pboro that’s potentially 3 number 1’s gone. 
 

I like you am a speedway junkie and want weekly fixtures from April till October but we perhaps have to realise there are many mitigating circumstances why this isn’t feasible.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@gmuncie

totally agree with the maybe lack of perspective and the fact that I’d go see speedway regardless of who was racing.

I think the basso thing was always going to be Glasgow but with the potential 30 ish meetings he was only going to ride in the championship.

having not been to an NDL match, hopefully in the not too distant future we may see one in Glasgow, you never know. What are the attendances like at Armadale, Berwick, Leicester Oxford etc when they run NDL meetings without the championship teams running?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Beirao said:

Seems the NDL tail is wagging the Championship dog!

But if the NL went down to 4 or 5 clubs, would that be feasible. If there was no NL where do the Championship riders of the future come from? Teams could end up flying more riders in from abroad / paying for more visas, making the Championship more expensive & possibly losing more clubs - so even less matches!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, szkocjasid said:

But if the NL went down to 4 or 5 clubs, would that be feasible. If there was no NL where do the Championship riders of the future come from? Teams could end up flying more riders in from abroad / paying for more visas, making the Championship more expensive & possibly losing more clubs - so even less matches!

Take your point about the need to have an NDL, but with Armadale uncertain/unlikely- you tell me - there are only two Championship clubs tracking teams in both divisions - Berwick and Oxford. Might be wrong but Berwick seem to be ok with double headers so have the Championship fixtures been halved just to suit Oxford. Ironically most supporters predictions of the league finishing order have Berwick and Oxford misding the cut for the play offs so both clubs will have plenty of blank weeks at the end of the season! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Beirao said:

Take your point about the need to have an NDL, but with Armadale uncertain/unlikely- you tell me - there are only two Championship clubs tracking teams in both divisions - Berwick and Oxford. Might be wrong but Berwick seem to be ok with double headers so have the Championship fixtures been halved just to suit Oxford. Ironically most supporters predictions of the league finishing order have Berwick and Oxford misding the cut for the play offs so both clubs will have plenty of blank weeks at the end of the season! 

Just checking, 

Mildenhall

Workington

Leicester

Belle vue

Berwick 

Oxford

Kent ??

Plymouth (are the gladiators running this season)?

Armadale devils??? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, szkocjasid said:

But if the NL went down to 4 or 5 clubs, would that be feasible. If there was no NL where do the Championship riders of the future come from? Teams could end up flying more riders in from abroad / paying for more visas, making the Championship more expensive & possibly losing more clubs - so even less matches!

From second half events, like in the past....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does UK Martin seem to get so much pleasure from knocking everything that Birmingham try to do?

His latest post is no more than his jaundiced personal opinions which he tries to present as established facts. No one, for example has ever suggested that James Pearson was "The next Darcy Ward" when most accept that he was just a young lad with a lot of promise.

It's disappointing to read these posts from someone who worked so hard to get a planning consent for Birmingham - but if youv'e really gone sour on speedway Martin, why not find another pastime and lay off the negativity?

There are good people trying to make a go of speedway in Birmingham and who don't deserve all this.

 

 

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/1/2023 at 8:51 PM, uk_martin said:

Last year, Birmingham season ticket sales were based on promises of having a team, including "the new Darcy Ward", capable of reaching the play-off's, a team with a genuine #1, and the assumption that riders contracted to the team were available to ride at least all the home fixtures that the season ticket covered. Within days, the #1was off to pastures new, with the blessing of the club, having fulfilled his task of boosting season ticket sales, another rider became injured and ended his season / career, the Darcy Ward pretender proved to be a huge disappointment and Birmingham only had partial access to the rider whose priority lay in the Danish league. Not the kind of legacy of broken promises that inspire people to invest again.

Everyone is entitled to opinions but as a Director and minority shareholder in Birmingham Speedway I'd just like to clear a few things up:

Not a single season ticket was sold after Adam Ellis was signed!! The season tickets holders from 2022 have remained very loyal with a renewal rate of over 85% already.

I don't recall anyone from the club saying that James Pearson was the new Darcy Ward!   James is an emerging talent and was recommended by Leigh Adams, Craig Watson and Phil Morris amongst others, hopefully, he will build on his first season and prove a real asset in 2023.  I don't think James is a Darcy Ward pretender, he's just a 17 year old lad with decent ability looking to develop a career in the sport! 

As all fans know, due to the new promotion having access to the rider market later than all other Championship teams, it was extremely tough to sign heat leader standard riders.    Adam Ellis' signing was always a risk with his other commitments, when it became apparent he would miss matches and risk having a ban in the UK it made sense for him to be released with Justin Sedgman being available proving a solid replacement.

As for Claus Vissing, he disappointed on and off track, trying to move goal posts several times on an agreed deal! In an ideal world he wouldn't have been first choice, but as other teams found out there weren't riders queuing up to ride in the UK on a midweek evening! 

Broken promises?   Is that Nigel Tolley saying our aspirations were to get into the play-off's?  The two main shareholders Nigel and Tracey Smith worked their butts off to keep Birmingham Speedway going in 2022 and are continuing to do that alongside a band of willing volunteers so that 2023 will be more successful.  

Finally, this is all coming from someone who closely associated himself with the Phillips promotion at Birmingham, whose legacy was to break more promises than the current ever will!  

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good post...very good points made.

The only 'complaint/discretion' I would have, is the fact that the Ellis signing wasn't transparent!

Bottom line though....I feel that the Birmingham promotion are a giving set-up....predictions/opinions pushed aside, I'm happy to pay £20 to support them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy