Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Birmingham Brummies 2023


*JJ

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, GiveusaB said:

I think a stint at reserve will be the make/break of his season? unfortunately Paul doesn't seem to be his usual self atm.

We only have 4 home meetings left anyway, so I cant see any change coming.

Plymouth got rid of him for a reason. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Following Nick Morris Breach of the SCB Regulations at Birmingham Speedway on the 12th July 2023 and therefore receiving a 30 day suspension of his SCB Registration pending a SCB Disciplinary Hearing, the hearing was due to take place on the 25th July 2023. Mr Morris and his legal team requested a postponement of the hearing for a later date, on the understanding that Mr Morris suspension would continue until the hearing takes place, regardless that the date exceeded the initial 30 day suspension period."

 

How does this legal move make sense??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nickinho said:

"Following Nick Morris Breach of the SCB Regulations at Birmingham Speedway on the 12th July 2023 and therefore receiving a 30 day suspension of his SCB Registration pending a SCB Disciplinary Hearing, the hearing was due to take place on the 25th July 2023. Mr Morris and his legal team requested a postponement of the hearing for a later date, on the understanding that Mr Morris suspension would continue until the hearing takes place, regardless that the date exceeded the initial 30 day suspension period."

 

How does this legal move make sense??

Maybe he wants to stay suspended?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nickinho said:

"Following Nick Morris Breach of the SCB Regulations at Birmingham Speedway on the 12th July 2023 and therefore receiving a 30 day suspension of his SCB Registration pending a SCB Disciplinary Hearing, the hearing was due to take place on the 25th July 2023. Mr Morris and his legal team requested a postponement of the hearing for a later date, on the understanding that Mr Morris suspension would continue until the hearing takes place, regardless that the date exceeded the initial 30 day suspension period."

 

How does this legal move make sense??

He's probably too busy watching the ashes 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nickinho said:

"Following Nick Morris Breach of the SCB Regulations at Birmingham Speedway on the 12th July 2023 and therefore receiving a 30 day suspension of his SCB Registration pending a SCB Disciplinary Hearing, the hearing was due to take place on the 25th July 2023. Mr Morris and his legal team requested a postponement of the hearing for a later date, on the understanding that Mr Morris suspension would continue until the hearing takes place, regardless that the date exceeded the initial 30 day suspension period."

 

How does this legal move make sense??

He’s probably in Poland partying with his Aussie mates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Nickinho said:

"Following Nick Morris Breach of the SCB Regulations at Birmingham Speedway on the 12th July 2023 and therefore receiving a 30 day suspension of his SCB Registration pending a SCB Disciplinary Hearing, the hearing was due to take place on the 25th July 2023. Mr Morris and his legal team requested a postponement of the hearing for a later date, on the understanding that Mr Morris suspension would continue until the hearing takes place, regardless that the date exceeded the initial 30 day suspension period."

How does this legal move make sense??

The only thing that comes to mind is that Nick and his team are conducting their own blood/laboratory tests. If these show him to be innocent of drug taking and the SCB accept the evidence as admissible, that might help his case. He may, however, still be punished for non compliance with the testing procedure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, False dawn said:

The only thing that comes to mind is that Nick and his team are conducting their own blood/laboratory tests. If these show him to be innocent of drug taking and the SCB accept the evidence as admissible, that might help his case. He may, however, still be punished for non compliance with the testing procedure.

If that’s the case are they saying that methods being used in speedway are not right,don’t think that will help his case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, False dawn said:

The only thing that comes to mind is that Nick and his team are conducting their own blood/laboratory tests. If these show him to be innocent of drug taking and the SCB accept the evidence as admissible, that might help his case. He may, however, still be punished for non compliance with the testing procedure.

The thing there is tho, surely any samples will have had to be taken at the same time of the event?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Fromafar said:

Would agree with that.

You have too question why he didn’t take 2nd sample.

Both Barker and Kyle Hogarth took their 2nd test so they could argue their case Nick refused so that’s his downfall big ban coming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Fromafar said:

It could be a Stuart Dickson masterplan!.Keep him suspended and get better riders to guest for Brummies to help get Top 6 place.!!

Could be?

Keep calling off the hearing till the end of the season and, it all blows away in a wintery wind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, False dawn said:

The only thing that comes to mind is that Nick and his team are conducting their own blood/laboratory tests. If these show him to be innocent of drug taking and the SCB accept the evidence as admissible, that might help his case. He may, however, still be punished for non compliance with the testing procedure.

 

5 hours ago, Fromafar said:

If that’s the case are they saying that methods being used in speedway are not right, don’t think that will help his case.

4 hours ago, ruffdiamond said:

The thing there is tho, surely any samples will have had to be taken at the same time of the event?

I didn't say it was valid or might work in Nick's favour. I'm just guessing in the absence of any public facts. Like everyone else.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy