Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Luton Speedway


HertsRacer

Recommended Posts

I have been researching the history of speedway in Luton. It is known that the track operated between 1934 and 1936 on an open licence primarily as a training track for Wembley. Most articles state that the track closed after 1936 due to poor crowds and financial reasons. However I have discovered that the track was then taken over by former rider and Birmingham promoter Arthur Westwood who planned to join the Second Division in 1937. There are several articles in the local newspapers about this, and of fund raising events being organised to achieve this. Then these articles suddenly stop and nothing more is heard of Luton Speedway. I have read that there may have been noise complaints from residents but can't confirm this. Does anybody know what actually happened to end speedway in Luton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arthur Westwood was optimistic about staging Provincial League speedway at the Luton track in 1937, but when that was not possible, he turned his attention to opening a track in Reading, again without success.  Undeterred, he looked at re-opening the Tipnor track at Portsmouth only to be frustrated for a third time.  Portsmouth did stage a couple of meetings later in the year.  It proved to be fourth time lucky when he finally got permission to re-open Hall Green, Birmingham.  Les Bowden and Cecil De La Porte were included in the Hall Green team, both originally destined for Luton.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, norbold said:

According to a dusty old book on my bookshelf called, "Speedway in the South East" there was an injunction granted to local residents over the noise levels forcing Luton to close down. The last meeting was held on 13 July 1936.

Thanks for that. Looking at an ariel photo of the track there were houses close on two sides, but probably no worse than many tracks of that era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, HertsRacer said:

Thanks for that. Looking at an ariel photo of the track there were houses close on two sides, but probably no worse than many tracks of that era.

According to the Speedway News (17th April 1937), the principal reason for Luton not proceeding, even though preparations were at an advanced stage, was a protest from the local hospital, presumably on noise grounds.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2022 at 3:46 PM, BL65 said:

According to the Speedway News (17th April 1937), the principal reason for Luton not proceeding, even though preparations were at an advanced stage, was a protest from the local hospital, presumably on noise grounds.  

That's interesting. Makes you wonder why they didn't complain back in 1934 when Luton opened. Probably because the Luton and Dunstable Hospital, which was a fair distance away from the track, wasn't built until 1939. Looks like they assumed there were going to be noise problems and complained accordingly, even though the track was there first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, HertsRacer said:

That's interesting. Makes you wonder why they didn't complain back in 1934 when Luton opened. Probably because the Luton and Dunstable Hospital, which was a fair distance away from the track, wasn't built until 1939. Looks like they assumed there were going to be noise problems and complained accordingly, even though the track was there first.

I understand that the Luton and Dunstable Hospital replaced The Bute Hospital, which was located on Dunstable Road and opened in 1882.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BL65 said:

I understand that the Luton and Dunstable Hospital replaced The Bute Hospital, which was located on Dunstable Road and opened in 1882.

So, you're a hospital historian as well as a speedway historian, eh? :t:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BL65 said:

Unfortunately, I have been to almost as many hospitals as speedway tracks in the last 20 years.

Ouch. That's not good. Still, that's not 1882 - unless you really are that old!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy