Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Witches v Aces Play off Semi Final 1st leg 29/9/22


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

 

SR 010.3.1 Cut Off Date
No team changes will be allowed after 28th August with the effective date being 31st August. Except riders returning to the team after injury who must re-take their position, dictated by their MA, with their replacement being released.

Ah that would be a no then. So Bomber for home leg and Basso for away leg maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, PhilTheAce said:

Is he current no1 in belle Vue las averages??

 

I would say an 8.40 average is certainly a no1 in this league 

Er yes it is. Only one, Doyle, has an official average in excess of 8.41 at present.

And looking at unofficial averages only Doyle has an average in excess of 8.30. Using either measure there are six riders with averages in excess of 8.00.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, foreverblue said:

Ah that would be a no then. So Bomber for home leg and Basso for away leg maybe.

Mickey for home leg, Minnie for away leg maybe?. :D

NB. Are any of the teams left in got promoters on the MC?...;) 

Edited by mikebv
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, foreverblue said:

It happened at Plymouth, Nicholls rode in the home meeting but not in the away play off meeting at Poole.

I know, I was responding to someone who suggested it should be a guest who rides in both legs if average fits etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, arnieg said:

Can't see how either are eligible.

 

12.4.2 (e) no rider, whose team is in the play offs may appear as a guest in the play offs, in that league.

Klindt and Pickering aren't in the play offs so are free to guest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, arnieg said:

Can't see how either are eligible.

 

12.4.2 (e) no rider, whose team is in the play offs may appear as a guest in the play offs, in that league.

King's Lynn and Boro are not in the play offs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, 2ndbend said:

When riding at 1 his average fell to 7.43... just saying

Can't see where it was that "low"?  Don't forget that averages were also affected by the reduction in numbers of matches month-on-month.

Even so, not every rider is suited to the #1 position - the rule that forces the top average to be #1 is unnecessary and pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said:

Can't see where it was that "low"?  Don't forget that averages were also affected by the reduction in numbers of matches month-on-month.

Even so, not every rider is suited to the #1 position - the rule that forces the top average to be #1 is unnecessary and pointless.

Don’t fall for it. He made it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy