Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Sheffield Tigers 2023


OdsalBoy

Recommended Posts

On 8/28/2023 at 5:48 PM, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

How was this allowed - presumably visa were required

Two Brits replaced by two foreigners who are (by necessity of averages) considered inferior

I thought Brexit meant Brexit ;)

Nonsense - it’s sport and it’s a competition. Sheffield have made changes to make sure they are as competitive as they deem that they can be. 

That goes for any job in the UK. If somebody isn’t performing as they should, they don’t have a god given right to keep that job over a foreigner because of their nationality. That is irrelevant if they aren’t meeting the required standards.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s interesting the Holder-bashing too - he is well out of form in Poland and it’s pretty clear that he isn’t able to mix it at the top table like he did when he was world champion, however… it was only last year when he was flying for Ostrow for much of the year. He is without doubt a confidence based rider so if he can start off well then he might do okay…. Assuming the track isn’t wet :unsure:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, stevebrum said:

C Holder for Ellis is a strange one. He has shown zero interest in the UK (until this year when he signed (but didn’t) for the Panthers), is way past his best and will struggle to maintain his 7 pointish average imho.

knee jerk reaction from the Tigers management in my opinion but good to see changes happening before the play offs start.

At least it is before the play offs start not once they have started!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Najjer said:

It’s interesting the Holder-bashing too - he is well out of form in Poland and it’s pretty clear that he isn’t able to mix it at the top table like he did when he was world champion, however… it was only last year when he was flying for Ostrow for much of the year. He is without doubt a confidence based rider so if he can start off well then he might do okay…. Assuming the track isn’t wet :unsure:

One problem is the Wolves track which he hates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, IronScorpion said:

Someone, a few pages ago pointed out the numbers game but has not been followed through. Pre 1/9 you are over the limit & signing C Holder @ 7.16 & Vissing @ 4.16 converted(total 11.32) to replace Ellis @ 6.00 & Kerr @ 5.73 still puts you over at 39.05. It is then the signing of Tai @ 7.03 for Jack @ 8.91, who says he can not commit if not 100% & not let them down, which has allowed the 3 changes & go under the limit. 

The 39.00 limit only applies for initial team building. For subsequent changes, weaker teams can build up to 39.00, while re-declarations for stronger teams must be lower than their existing total.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said:

The 39.00 limit only applies for initial team building. For subsequent changes, weaker teams can build up to 39.00, while re-declarations for stronger teams must be lower than their existing total.

012.2 TEAM COMPOSITION
A Premiership team’s initial declaration must not exceed 39.00 points for the top 6 riders. Rising Star riders will be declared at number 7.
A Premiership teams declaration must not exceed 39.00 points in any declaration following the issue of established MA’s for 2023 for 6 riders, (excluding the Rising Star rider). Except where the MA of the introduced rider is equal to, or lower than the rider being replaced.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Daniel Smith said:

I think these changes are horrible for Sheffield. 

I'll say it now, Holder won't average more than Kerr. 

Signing Chris Holder was an easy option for Sheffield as he's been there with his brother several times this season. Remember he is returning after some horrendous injuries which may partially explain his low scores in Poland. For Sheffield a few low scores will be better than 0,0,0.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Najjer said:

Nonsense - it’s sport and it’s a competition. Sheffield have made changes to make sure they are as competitive as they deem that they can be. 

That goes for any job in the UK. If somebody isn’t performing as they should, they don’t have a god given right to keep that job over a foreigner because of their nationality. That is irrelevant if they aren’t meeting the required standards.

Note the winking emoji - it was very much a tongue in cheek comment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally think Sheffield had to make a move as Adam Ellis just wasn’t doing what was needed from a 3rd heat leader but it’s a tough one for Lewi Kerr as had done nothing wrong just purely numbers, Chris Holder will score more than Adam was doing  (generally scored 6 from 4 over last few months), but Claus Vissing will score less at reserve than Lewi Kerr was doing and doesn’t give Sheffield much cover down there now if Jason Edwards/Josh Pickering/Kyle Howarth is struggling in a meeting so could end up being zero effect.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Daniel Smith said:

Kerr & Ellis have a combined ave of 10.84.

Can't see Holder & Vissing improving that. 

Sheffield have just deaded themselves I'm afraid. 

Well they had to do something as Ellis was so poor and Holder should beat most second strings, we shall have to see, the downside is come the play offs they will most likely face Wolves, a team in form and a track Chris Holder hates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Daniel Smith said:

Kerr & Ellis have a combined ave of 10.84.

Can't see Holder & Vissing improving that. 

Sheffield have just deaded themselves I'm afraid. 

Kerr and Ellis' August combined average is 11.73. From Sept 1st it would be 11.27.

Holder and Vissing  11.16 from tomorrow.

Its always down to numbers!

Edited by Skidder1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Skidder1 said:

Kerr and Ellis' August combined average is 11.73. From Sept 1st it would be 11.27.

Holder and Vissing  11.16 from tomorrow.

Its always down to numbers!

I based it on just 2023 figures, more accurate to form. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, foreverblue said:

Well they had to do something as Ellis was so poor and Holder should beat most second strings, we shall have to see, the downside is come the play offs they will most likely face Wolves, a team in form and a track Chris Holder hates.

Other than the Wolves riders I can't think of many riders who actually like Monmore Green. I couldn't understand why they used to hold the British Championship there year after year until the NSS was built.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ouch said:

012.2 TEAM COMPOSITION
A Premiership team’s initial declaration must not exceed 39.00 points for the top 6 riders. Rising Star riders will be declared at number 7.
A Premiership teams declaration must not exceed 39.00 points in any declaration following the issue of established MA’s for 2023 for 6 riders, (excluding the Rising Star rider). Except where the MA of the introduced rider is equal to, or lower than the rider being replaced.

Highlighted wording is what I referred to.

Of course, what I didn't think about was that CHolder's average is in excess of Ellis', so I guess that means the Sheffield redeclaration has to be below 39.00 - so that's why Vissing was chosen, and he's cheerfully on 4.00 (although I thought his most recent Prem average is 4.43?).

Edited by Roger Jacobs
Still trying to work out where the averages have come from!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy