Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Wolves 2023


noaksey

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, flagrag said:

Wolves have a real surprise signing coming up and has ridden for most Premiership clubs now 

Any chance it might be someone who has 'retired'?

If you believe all the rumours doing the rounds on the Championship section, Rory Schlein is coming back!!!!!

Edited by Skidder1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, noaksey said:

If you accept the Peterborough Dads army was a one off that is unlikely to be repeated last years good sides had excellent heat leaders 

Fricke(Lambert) Kurtz Zagar

Holder Musielak Ellis

Wolves don't and 13 and 15 have been a problem. Maybe he's banking on Becker and/or Douglas improving to that level but that's a big gamble 

Ipswich were a good side this season but only had Doyle firing each meeting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bagpuss said:

No idea why you wouldn't want Bomber but in any case he has only ridden for two Prem clubs to my knowledge and therefore not most.

Speedway grand final 2017 home leg to Swindon. Lost on aggregate  90-89. No Lindgren or Thorssell. Harris guesting 4 points - rubbish from a "track specialist". He beat Bellego (second string) and Liam  Carr and Wilson-Dean both reserves.  Doubt if he has scored as low as that on any subsequent visit.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, noaksey said:

Not relevant to the league/cup

I'm thinking bias here.  You were saying the best sides needed decent heat leaders.  I pointed out a decent side who could've finished top of the league but who didn't have much beyond Doyle but you are arguing against that for some reason???  You said they didn't win anything - they did with more than just three riders but there you go again.  It may not suit your agenda but it remains a fact that Ipswich were a good side.

Edited by SPEEDY69
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, SPEEDY69 said:

I'm thinking bias here.  You were saying the best sides needed decent heat leaders.  I pointed out a decent side who could've finished top of the league but who didn't have much beyond Doyle but you are arguing against that for some reason???  You said they didn't win anything - they did with more than just three riders but there you go again.  It may not suit your agenda but it remains a fact that Ipswich were a good side.

:rofl: I'm sure there is no bias here, I mean from a Wolves supporters' point of view Ipswich were so poor that they beat wolves twice at Monmore, twice at Ipswich, then again in the pairs at Monmore and in the pairs at Ipswich. Shocking team :rofl:

Edited by wtf
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, wtf said:

:rofl: I'm sure there is no bias here, I mean from a Wolves supporters' point of view Ipswich were so poor that the beat wolves twice at Monmore, twice at Ipswich, then again in the pairs at Monmore and in the pairs at Ipswich. Shocking team :rofl:

Nobody has said they were "poor" or not a good team, they were excellent at Monmore. My point is and remains that the teams that won the league and Cup had 3 decent heat leaders and Wolves and Ippo didn't.

So my personal preference would be for Wolves to have a better 2nd heat leader to back up Masters 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy