Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Peterborough Panthers 2023


Flappy

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Sully said:

It reads as if the article was actually written by AEPG, and the timing of its publication was "impeccable"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, eric i said:

If they put the stadium along with parking up for sale as a sports venue, would someone buy it and make it cover its costs,......yes. Would it be anywhere near the sale value if it went for houses.......no, however that doesn't mean its not viable. Quoting rent 12x what it was, seems just a way to kick the speedway and make it appear unviable.

AEPG think that they say all of the right things but the more that they say and do, the more incompetent and selfish they look. If the East of England Agricultural Society and Peterborough City Council had held an open and well publicised initial consultation process then we'd never have got here in the first place. We wouldn't have been blighted by the self proclaimed Mr Motivator of the development industry trying to convince everyone of the AEPG alleged active wellness, lifestyle and health credentials that would easily have been delivered without their unwanted assistance.

Edited by Crump99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Noodles said:

His interview after the meeting aluded to exactly that 

Intrigued...So what was said then?..and for those in the know what's the ballpark chances of Panthers actually continuing at the Showground next season if someone steps in and planning permission is refused?..just trying to make sense of it all..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, chrismorton said:

Intrigued...So what was said then?..and for those in the know what's the ballpark chances of Panthers actually continuing at the Showground next season if someone steps in and planning permission is refused?..just trying to make sense of it all..

It's on the Panthers Facebook page

Basically there are some good people out there who want to do something and take it forward by building somewhere, now the season is over it's a case of sitting down and seeing where it goes from here 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hamish McRaker said:

It reads as if the article was actually written by AEPG, and the timing of its publication was "impeccable"

They seem to think we are all as stupid as they appear.  The majority of the added costs were probably due to the need to keep the whole site open without anything else operating there rather than changing it round so that the speedway was fenced with an enclosure in it's own area for operations, parking and security.  The pre and post-match security alone to check that entire site would have swallowed a fair lump of cash that would not have been necessary had they not been so pig-headed as to keep trying to clear a part of the site that will now just rot away just so they could carry on pretending the speedway was no more viable than all the events that used to use the site that were evicted s well so they could make more money getting houses and roads built on it.  The grandstand, track and pits were actually closer to the entrance gate than almost the whole of the rest of the site and could have easily been separated off for years.  And I would have thought that the EEAS members could have provided loads of goats or cows to keep the grass short on the rest of the site so it was at least doing more good for the charity than just leaving it to waste while they get their act together for what is likely to be a 10-year plan at the very least.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Noodles said:

From the article..

"It’s a major boost to a local consortium, who we can now reveal, are in deep negotiations with current owner Keith Chapman to buy the club."

"Sport England’s intervention has breathed fresh impetus into the consortium who are desperate to buy the speedway rights from Chapman" 

 

 

 Surely both parties can sort a deal out between themselves.. There can't be much value in it. Air fence, flood lights and any machinery that Buster has brought in .Or is it just the name they want ? Someone on here has posted that the floodlights might be off to Workington ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, SUPERACE said:

Fingers crossed, at least it offers some hope. 

Not just that but at last a journalist who understands the problem and doesn't just spout the AEPG garbage as FACT.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mick Bratley said:

Yep, that’s quite a seed change.

:D autocorrect I presume, 'sea change'. Good to see Sport England object. 

Edited by SPEEDY69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Believe in those fighting for us, They truly care about our club.

Ignore anything Buster says because he wants us gone hence why he hasn't bothered putting up any kind of fight and just encouraged people to give up all hope.

#KEEPTHEFAITH 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TTT said:

Believe in those fighting for us, They truly care about our club.

Ignore anything Buster says because he wants us gone hence why he hasn't bothered putting up any kind of fight and just encouraged people to give up all hope.

#KEEPTHEFAITH 

I don't believe that he wants us gone but he's clearly not got the affinity to the club compared to those who came before him. He had to keep AEPG sweet all year, and probably still does? Some of the messaging and detail (or not) within it throughout 2023 has, even so, been rather disappointing though!

Buster is done now though. The important thing now is to keep the pressure up on the EEAS/AEPR/PCC which will be vital support for those behind the scenes fighting for our future.

Edited by Crump99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Bald Bloke said:

From the article..

"It’s a major boost to a local consortium, who we can now reveal, are in deep negotiations with current owner Keith Chapman to buy the club."

"Sport England’s intervention has breathed fresh impetus into the consortium who are desperate to buy the speedway rights from Chapman" 

 

 

 Surely both parties can sort a deal out between themselves.. There can't be much value in it. Air fence, flood lights and any machinery that Buster has brought in .Or is it just the name they want ? Someone on here has posted that the floodlights might be off to Workington ?

 

I was told Saturday night at the farewell meeting everything speedway connected needs to be removed within 7 days from the site and yes apparently Workington have bought the track lights how true any of this is time will tell 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Haza said:

I was told Saturday night at the farewell meeting everything speedway connected needs to be removed within 7 days from the site and yes apparently Workington have bought the track lights how true any of this is time will tell 

I wouldn't believe a word of it and negotiations along with suitable financial arrangements can fix most things.

Under pressure AEPG couldn't get their prepared statement out quick enough on Sunday and that said: 

What will happen to the track at the end of the 2023 season?

AEPG and the current owners of the Panthers are in conversation about the removal of any elements owned by Peterborough Speedway and Keith Chapman. There is a good relationship and a timeline which suits both parties will be agreed. At no time have AEPG given a deadline for this activity to take place.

And after yesterday's glimmer of hope they've similarly rushed out their counter story which I'm sure raises more questions than it answers.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Noodles said:

Sport England, who almost put a nail in the coffin of a return of Speedway to Brandon with the person they sent to testify at the Public Inquiry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy