Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Peterborough Panthers 2023


Flappy

Recommended Posts

If you lot think this is bad, try joining the 'Panthers speedway chat' on Facebook.. I'm getting shot down left right and centre for being disappointed with the season. They all seem to think everything is all rosey and fine :lol:

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheSmiler said:

If you lot think this is bad, try joining the 'Panthers speedway chat' on Facebook.. I'm getting shot down left right and centre for being disappointed with the season. They all seem to think everything is all rosey and fine :lol:

They can’t be helped. 15 defeats in a row, 16 pending tonight, say no more 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bald Bloke said:

So you understand the problem he has then.

NP messed your team up on the first corner. 

They messed the team up by signing Pedersen. Quite a few people predicted he would find it tough, and wouldn't last the season. Obviously, no one guessed it wouldn't even be a lap!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said:

They messed the team up by signing Pedersen. Quite a few people predicted he would find it tough, and wouldn't last the season. Obviously, no one guessed it wouldn't even be a lap!

Pedersen is on a sticky wicket in Poland too.Don’t think they will put up much more with him pulling out meetings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Fromafar said:

Pedersen is on a sticky wicket in Poland too.Don’t think they will put up much more with him pulling out meetings.

Going through some tests this week.

May not even see the season out for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JoeW436 said:

The cake with 46 candles on should of given him the clarity he needed to make a decision on retirement 

Agree, He's just being stubborn and selfish at this point.

Stubborn for failing to admit that it's time to call it a day.

Selfish for dragging his own clubs into the mud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have mentioned previously, the club/sponsor must have offered NP very good money to ride for Peterborough. 

What has now happened to this investment which must run into thousands of pounds? Can it not be used to sign a top rider which the management claim to be too expensive?

All seems a bit strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tinker said:

As others have mentioned previously, the club/sponsor must have offered NP very good money to ride for Peterborough. 

What has now happened to this investment which must run into thousands of pounds? Can it not be used to sign a top rider which the management claim to be too expensive?

All seems a bit strange.

Exactly that they've saved a killing with him having missed so many meetings. 

If the 3k a meeting was true that's £15k minimum they've saved, I really can't imagine they've spent anywhere near than on guests and R/R

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tinker said:

As others have mentioned previously, the club/sponsor must have offered NP very good money to ride for Peterborough. 

What has now happened to this investment which must run into thousands of pounds? Can it not be used to sign a top rider which the management claim to be too expensive?

All seems a bit strange.

It was said NP was on 3.5K a meeting guarantee . Believe it or not that is reasonable money.Zagar is more expensive.I’d imagine it would cost more to bring a top rider over.If they would come

Edited by Bald Bloke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Mick Bratley said:

But that isn’t necessarily so. The development plans should make provision for a new facility according to the councils Peterborough local plan (LP30). Whether this happens or not is what we are all waiting to see when the development plans are published on the councils planning portal. If a new facility is included in some way then the owner has something tangible to sell, if a new facility is not included, then a long drawn out battle will undoubtedly commence.

And coupled with LP36 the Council should not approve planning permission without suitable or better provision for any existing sport facility proposed to be lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, chrismorton said:

I swear that our management are trying to wind us up now..an effing Lynn reserve guesting at No1 for us tonight!?..can someone please explain to me what's the logic in that?

Well I certainly can’t.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, chrismorton said:

I swear that our management are trying to wind us up now..an effing Lynn reserve guesting at No1 for us tonight!?..can someone please explain to me what's the logic in that?

Cheaper than proper guest and rider replacement

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, chrismorton said:

I swear that our management are trying to wind us up now..an effing Lynn reserve guesting at No1 for us tonight!?..can someone please explain to me what's the logic in that?

 

20 minutes ago, bigcatdiary said:

Well I certainly can’t.

Well he isn’t a “reserve” is he let’s get that right. He started as a reserve because of a crafty bit of shenanigans by Lynn. Who’d have thunk it!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy