Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Ipswich v Peterborough June 23rd


Recommended Posts

Two quick things I haven’t mentioned, agree with Baldy about the track. Was good last night which must have been very tough to prep with the dry warm weather so credit where it’s due. And was also not only good to see King looking much better, but he actually rode some good inside lines to good effect in 15 and 16 which we don’t often see so good on him. Hopefully the start of better form for the second half of the season. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why only for a drawn match - it's still a valid result.  Why not have a coupe of extra heats if it finishes 46-44 - with a bit of different luck the result could have gone either way.  What makes a draw need an extra race, because it's not exciting enough in its own right?

How many new fans will be drawn (LOL!) to the sport, in the hope they get an extra race?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, stu219 said:

Weather you agree with the superheat its box office for sure. Just had to see that nonone left before the end and the reaction of the crowd showed the passion. Many have been crying out for this and we got it last night. My thoughts for what its worth is that the super heat should just be for an extra point though. So last night it would have been ipswich 2 points and boro 2 points. Still worth having the super heat though

and we all got an extra race and what a race it was hey?

So why only for a draw? Why not for a close result, which could have gone either way? Why not have 20 heat matches, so people get even more value for their money?  Maybe, on the basis of last night, there will be thousands more at Foxhall next week ... actually not, there's not another home match until 14 July ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said:

So why only for a draw? Why not for a close result, which could have gone either way? Why not have 20 heat matches, so people get even more value for their money?  Maybe, on the basis of last night, there will be thousands more at Foxhall next week ... actually not, there's not another home match until 14 July ... 

There will be thousands more at Foxhall next week as it's National Hot Rod World Final Weekend.

no denying the atmosphere after the Superheat was great but was just as good after heat 15 after we'd salvaged a draw and 1point was prob all we deserved.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Tom Thumb said:

There will be thousands more at Foxhall next week as it's National Hot Rod World Final Weekend.

no denying the atmosphere after the Superheat was great but was just as good after heat 15 after we'd salvaged a draw and 1point was prob all we deserved.

I’d argue that was because it secured the super heat and gave us the chance of winning it. Would it have been the same if it was just the draw with no super heat to follow? I personally doubt it. I also disagree that the atmosphere was just as good after 15 as it was for the super heat. Certainly wasn’t where I was standing. 

Edited by Arch Stanton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tom Thumb said:

There will be thousands more at Foxhall next week as it's National Hot Rod World Final Weekend.

no denying the atmosphere after the Superheat was great but was just as good after heat 15 after we'd salvaged a draw and 1point was prob all we deserved.

Ipswich deserved the 3 points because they managed to do what was needed to secure them. Instead of all the hard done by stories and whinging, if you want the 3 points then just win the damn meeting! It’s pretty simple. Ipswich go to Sheffield on Monday knowing full well if it’s a draw after 15 heats then they’ll have to win a super heat to earn the 3 points. If they don’t then they’ll go home with one. Not one club is being hard done by here and not one club has an advantage over anyone else. The rules are set at the start of the season and every club has an equal amount of home and away meetings to secure as many points as they can within the current rules. If you draw an away meeting but then lose the super heat, tough! Take your point and on to the next. 

Edited by Steve Irving
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Steve Irving said:

Ipswich deserved the 3 points because they managed to do what was needed to secure them. Instead of all the hard done by stories and whinging, if you want the 3 points then just win the damn meeting! It’s pretty simple. Ipswich go to Sheffield on Monday knowing full well if it’s a draw after 15 heats then they’ll have to win a super heat to earn the 3 points. If they don’t then they’ll go home with one. Not one club is being hard done by here and not one club has an advantage over anyone else. The rules are set at the start of the season and every club has an equal amount of home and away meetings to secure as many points as they can within the current rules. If you draw an away meeting but then lose the super heat, tough! Take your point and on to the next. 

But the whole point is ... why?

A draw is a valid result, no different to 44-46 or 62-28. Why is there a need to make it different?

The League point structure was changed to reward the away team with an extra league point for a narrow loss (-7 or less), a draw, a win by up to +6, and a win by +7 or more, because in speedway it is recognised that a good away performance is more difficult to achieve.

So why does a draw have to be different to any other result?

If the result had been 44-46 or 46-44, maybe there should be two or three more heats to add even more excitement?

If it's 49-41 should there be another heat to see if the away team can get the extra away point.  Or if it's 41-49, should there be another heat to see if the home team can stop the away team winning the additional league point?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roger Jacobs said:

But the whole point is ... why?

A draw is a valid result, no different to 44-46 or 62-28. Why is there a need to make it different?

The League point structure was changed to reward the away team with an extra league point for a narrow loss (-7 or less), a draw, a win by up to +6, and a win by +7 or more, because in speedway it is recognised that a good away performance is more difficult to achieve.

So why does a draw have to be different to any other result?

If the result had been 44-46 or 46-44, maybe there should be two or three more heats to add even more excitement?

If it's 49-41 should there be another heat to see if the away team can get the extra away point.  Or if it's 41-49, should there be another heat to see if the home team can stop the away team winning the additional league point?

That really doesn’t make much sense to me. If a team win away from home 41-49 then of course there shouldn’t be an extra heat, the away team quite rightly take home the points. You may think an extra heat after a draw is absurd, but your suggestion really would be. The rules are clear and designed to award the points for a win on the night. The same if it was 44-46 or 46-44, you already have your winner so obviously no need for the extra heat. If it ends up a draw, then go to the super heat to decide the points! To me it’s quite clear they’ve tried to add something a little extra and it remains to be seen if they stick with it next season and beyond. Obviously it’s far too quirky for some and that’s fine, we all will have an opinion on it. But I’d say Speedway so often gets criticised for being stuck in the dark ages and having the stigma of having an old pensioners following, is it the older traditionalists who don’t like change that mainly have a problem with this? The same one’s that hated the green helmet colour and hankered for the return of the old yellow/black combo? It’s a tense and exciting climax for those watching and is in my opinion a great addition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Roger Jacobs said:

But the whole point is ... why?

A draw is a valid result, no different to 44-46 or 62-28. Why is there a need to make it different?

The League point structure was changed to reward the away team with an extra league point for a narrow loss (-7 or less), a draw, a win by up to +6, and a win by +7 or more, because in speedway it is recognised that a good away performance is more difficult to achieve.

So why does a draw have to be different to any other result?

If the result had been 44-46 or 46-44, maybe there should be two or three more heats to add even more excitement?

If it's 49-41 should there be another heat to see if the away team can get the extra away point.  Or if it's 41-49, should there be another heat to see if the home team can stop the away team winning the additional league point?

I agree with Steve here, I think the part in bold is part of the problem these days to be honest. The sport is crying out for something a bit different. Not sure if you were there or not but if you weren’t, maybe your opinion on it would soften if you were there and caught up in the moment? Then again probably not, think your mind is well and truly made up on this one. 
 

I can honestly say i can’t remember ever leaving the stadium with the same buzz I felt on Thursday evening..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steve Irving said:

That really doesn’t make much sense to me. If a team win away from home 41-49 then of course there shouldn’t be an extra heat, the away team quite rightly take home the points. You may think an extra heat after a draw is absurd, but your suggestion really would be. The rules are clear and designed to award the points for a win on the night. The same if it was 44-46 or 46-44, you already have your winner so obviously no need for the extra heat. If it ends up a draw, then go to the super heat to decide the points! To me it’s quite clear they’ve tried to add something a little extra and it remains to be seen if they stick with it next season and beyond. Obviously it’s far too quirky for some and that’s fine, we all will have an opinion on it. But I’d say Speedway so often gets criticised for being stuck in the dark ages and having the stigma of having an old pensioners following, is it the older traditionalists who don’t like change that mainly have a problem with this? The same one’s that hated the green helmet colour and hankered for the return of the old yellow/black combo? It’s a tense and exciting climax for those watching and is in my opinion a great addition. 

Fair enough.  The point (if you'll pardon the pun) that I'm trying to make is that if a draw is a close result, which the away team was previously rewarded for automatically, then so is 49-41 or 41-49, because both results are close enough for teams to gain or lose another league point. Why is a draw different, when it's a tense result in its own right? Why does it need another heat, when no other valid results do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Roger Jacobs said:

Fair enough.  The point (if you'll pardon the pun) that I'm trying to make is that if a draw is a close result, which the away team was previously rewarded for automatically, then so is 49-41 or 41-49, because both results are close enough for teams to gain or lose another league point. Why is a draw different, when it's a tense result in its own right? Why does it need another heat, when no other valid results do?

We’re going around in circles here. Of course a draw is a close result, you can’t get closer can you? There isn’t a winner, it’s a draw, level. 49-41 is a clear win for the home side, 41-49 is a clear win for the away side.  close? Well sort of I suppose but where would you draw the line? There’s no need for an extra heat in those circumstances because there’s a clear winner on the night. That’s the top and bottom of it, they’ve introduced a new rule to make sure there’s a winner on the night. No mutual pats on the back or gentleman’s handshake on a “fair” well earned draw, there’s going to be a winner, and there’s going to be a loser. You’re going to win some, and you’re going to lose some, swings and roundabouts. What can’t be denied is that it’s a hugely exciting end to a meeting that a draw simply can’t match. I respect your opinion on this and you’re not in favour and you’re clearly not alone. I have a different opinion and think it’s good for the sport. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Arch Stanton said:

I agree with Steve here, I think the part in bold is part of the problem these days to be honest. The sport is crying out for something a bit different. Not sure if you were there or not but if you weren’t, maybe your opinion on it would soften if you were there and caught up in the moment? Then again probably not, think your mind is well and truly made up on this one. 
 

I can honestly say i can’t remember ever leaving the stadium with the same buzz I felt on Thursday evening..

Well.....that unexpected win against Poole in the semifinals was pretty damn exciting :lol:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only ones who seem to like these golden heats are the ones who have benefitted from them.People I have spoke to think it's a waste of time and effort,especially for the away side.

We never get draws in other sports do we,oh hang on,only the biggest sports in the world.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tellboy said:

The only ones who seem to like these golden heats are the ones who have benefitted from them.People I have spoke to think it's a waste of time and effort,especially for the away side.

We never get draws in other sports do we,oh hang on,only the biggest sports in the world.

Well I have it on good authority that the FA are so impressed with speedway's golden heat that they plan to introduce something similar to the premier League next season. An unexpected result of this fact finding mission is they will also be introducing a guest player system as well.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, cowboy cookie returns? said:

Well I have it on good authority that the FA are so impressed with speedway's golden heat that they plan to introduce something similar to the premier League next season. An unexpected result of this fact finding mission is they will also be introducing a guest player system as well.

Has Bomber got a pair of football boots? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy