Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

NEWCASTLE DIAMONDS 2022


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, enotian said:

more interesting to see the size of the lad. apparently lost a lot of weight but shall we say he doesn't look to have the usual physique of a modern day rider. doesn't look like he'll get out muscled in the first corner but will he make it there at the same time as the other less rotund riders?

i imagine he was owned by a promotion who no longer exist and his 'asset status' reverted to the BSPL when any new promotion decided not to acquire the 'asset status' of a retired rider. They're still obsessed with having an asset system in place even if you have no rights over that 'asset' beyond the season long contract you have with them.

Sounds like Paul Hurry last year!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fromafar said:

Interesting that it’s stated that Lee Complin has become aClub Asset ,who owned his previous contract,I thought it was maybe Berwick but not sure if we purchased him when he signed.

the asset system is still there because no one has yet challenged it. If they did it would be found to be unlawful and unenforceable under employment laws

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fromafar said:

Interesting that it’s stated that Lee Complin has become aClub Asset ,who owned his previous contract,I thought it was maybe Berwick but not sure if we purchased him when he signed.

When Lee retired in 2012 it said he was a Sheffield Asset

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ch958 said:

the asset system is still there because no one has yet challenged it. If they did it would be found to be unlawful and unenforceable under employment laws

The retained list system is a private mechanism between promoters and so, as long as it doesn’t contravene equality diversity or, indeed, modern slavery legislation, there cannot be anything illegal about it. It is designed to provide a financial framework in the case of default. It has nothing to do with “employment” partly because no riders are employed.

All teams have to have a minimum value of riders on their retained list but they cannot stop any of “their” riders signing for another team so there is nothing for riders to challenge. Promoters could challenge the system if they wanted but, so far, it seems they choose to work within the existing rules. 

Edited by Wee Eck
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wee Eck said:

The retained list system is a private mechanism between promoters and so, as long as it doesn’t contravene equality diversity or, indeed, modern slavery legislation, there cannot be anything illegal about it. It is designed to provide a financial framework in the case of default. It has nothing to do with “employment” partly because no riders are employed.

All teams have to have a minimum value of riders on their retained list but they cannot stop any of “their” riders signing for another team so there is nothing for riders to challenge. Promoters could challenge the system if they wanted but, so far, it seems they choose to work within the existing rules. 

yes, its not going to be challenged any time soon so long as promoters retain it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Wee Eck said:

The retained list system is a private mechanism between promoters and so, as long as it doesn’t contravene equality diversity or, indeed, modern slavery legislation, there cannot be anything illegal about it. It is designed to provide a financial framework in the case of default. It has nothing to do with “employment” partly because no riders are employed.

All teams have to have a minimum value of riders on their retained list but they cannot stop any of “their” riders signing for another team so there is nothing for riders to challenge. Promoters could challenge the system if they wanted but, so far, it seems they choose to work within the existing rules. 

but they cannot stop any of “their” riders signing for another team!!

 I know of a few riders that have been blocked by their “parent club” to talk to other clubs,
Ask Max Clegg for one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bigred said:

but they cannot stop any of “their” riders signing for another team!!

 I know of a few riders that have been blocked by their “parent club” to talk to other clubs,
Ask Max Clegg for one.

There are rules about tapping up but those don’t stop a rider going where he wants. Ask Swindon about Adrian Miedinski - on Swindon’s retained list but wouldn’t ride for them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, enotian said:

more interesting to see the size of the lad. apparently lost a lot of weight but shall we say he doesn't look to have the usual physique of a modern day rider. doesn't look like he'll get out muscled in the first corner but will he make it there at the same time as the other less rotund riders?

i imagine he was owned by a promotion who no longer exist and his 'asset status' reverted to the BSPL when any new promotion decided not to acquire the 'asset status' of a retired rider. They're still obsessed with having an asset system in place even if you have no rights over that 'asset' beyond the season long contract you have with them.

What Promotion no longer exist.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fromafar said:

Thanks, wasn’t sure if we had purchased him from Sheffield.

Same here i always thought we had

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, enotian said:

more interesting to see the size of the lad. apparently lost a lot of weight but shall we say he doesn't look to have the usual physique of a modern day rider. doesn't look like he'll get out muscled in the first corner but will he make it there at the same time as the other less rotund riders?

i imagine he was owned by a promotion who no longer exist and his 'asset status' reverted to the BSPL when any new promotion decided not to acquire the 'asset status' of a retired rider. They're still obsessed with having an asset system in place even if you have no rights over that 'asset' beyond the season long contract you have with them.

He’s fat???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AndyPresley said:

He’s fat???

Heard he's been on the building side of things and had put on weight, but has been training hard and lost weight again good luck to him, looking forward to seeing him at Berwick.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, AndyPresley said:

He’s fat???

 

44 minutes ago, Bandit59 said:

Heard he's been on the building side of things and had put on weight, but has been training hard and lost weight again good luck to him, looking forward to seeing him at Berwick.

After 'retiring' from speedway he took up bodybuilding and therefore put on a bit of weight, which was all muscle.  He has lost a lot of muscle weight over the last year or so.  He didn't get 'fat' as we know it, as far as I know.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ruffdiamond said:

Looks as if he's got plenty of upper body strength, a bit like popeye.  ;)

Well with both Lee and Rob going to shed loads of weight to ride in the first Memorial meeting for Dave Tattum, probably should give the meeting sponsorship of the meeting to WeightWatchers, Very apt.

Edited by Tsunami
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tsunami said:

Well with both Lee and Rob going to shed loads of weight to ride in the first Memorial meeting for Dave Tatum, probably should give the meeting sponsorship of the meeting to WeightWatchers, Very apt.

Wouldn't say Lee needed to lose weight, bet he's good at arm wrestling tho! ;)

Edited by ruffdiamond
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ruffdiamond said:

Wouldn't say Lee needed to lose weight, bet he's good at are wrestling tho! ;)

I think he is too muscled and losing weight would help to made himself more manoeuvrable. He looks too muscle bound IMO and was pointed out in an earlier post.. 

Edited by Tsunami
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tsunami said:

I think he is too muscled and losing weight would help to made himself more manoeuvrable. He looks too muscle bound IMO and was pointed out in an earlier post.. 

Hope his gating has improved after 9 years away or he will struggle.Bonus is the 4.00. Average though.He might be able to achieve it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy