Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

GRAND PRIX CHALLENGE


Recommended Posts

On 6/11/2022 at 5:47 PM, Fromafar said:

 Don’t think present GP riders should be allowed in Challenge qualifiers.Think the GP challenge needs a re-jig.( for instance)Think the Top 6  Challenge Final should meet the bottom 6 in Gp standings for places next year.( or something different). Present GP riders should should not get 2 chances.To Cosy.That would still leave places for wild Cards

I've been saying for years along the lines of the next 6 or 8 in GP meet the qualifiers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Triple.H. said:

I've been saying for years along the lines of the next 6 or 8 in GP meet the qualifiers.

These Gp riders are spoiling the qualifiers,finishing 5th with 3 Gp men in Top 3 is no what the Qualifiers it is about.IMo

Edited by Fromafar
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, emilali said:

Apologies if this has already been posted and answered elsewhere but does anybody know if the tickets for the GP challenge at Glasgow have been released yet? If not, any idea when and where they are to be released? Thanks.

Just keep an eye on here https://glasgowtigers.ticketline.co.uk/glasgow-tigers-speedway#bio   not on sale yet. You could also send them a message asking them when they think they will go on sale https://glasgowtigers.co.uk/contact/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about?

Top 6 through.

7-14 join 8 qualifiers in the GP Challenge. 15th misses completely.

Top 6 in GP Challenge Qualify.

Leaves 3 spots:

1 goes to SEC Champ.

2 Wildcards (allows for covering riders who get injured and end up in 15th or miss the Challenge as a result).

Edited by Welwyn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once upon a time nobody got seeded. Everyone from the World Champion down started the next year from scratch. Didn’t stop Mauger winning 6, Fundin winning 5 or Briggs winning 4.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, customhouseregular said:

Once upon a time nobody got seeded. Everyone from the World Champion down started the next year from scratch. Didn’t stop Mauger winning 6, Fundin winning 5 or Briggs winning 4.

You'll have to point out which quali meetings Briggo rode in ,in 1958 

I also am finding it difficult to find Fundin in the Nordic, Continental or European Finals in 1957

Edited by iris123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, iris123 said:

You'll have to point out which quali meetings Briggo rode in ,in 1958 

I also am finding it difficult to find Fundin in the Nordic, Continental or European Finals in 1957

Or Peter Collins in the British final in 77...or penhall in the American final in 85...or the years there was no rider from the host country in the world final...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Welwyn said:

How about?

Top 6 through.

7-14 join 8 qualifiers in the GP Challenge. 15th misses completely.

Top 6 in GP Challenge Qualify.

Leaves 3 spots:

1 goes to SEC Champ.

2 Wildcards (allows for covering riders who get injured and end up in 15th or miss the Challenge as a result).

Love this. GP Challenge deserve to be a bigger thing, it is a massive part of our season and the fact that it oftentimes have gotten overlooked and not even been broadcasted is a disgrace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, iris123 said:

You'll have to point out which quali meetings Briggo rode in ,in 1958 

I also am finding it difficult to find Fundin in the Nordic, Continental or European Finals in 1957

I'm sure Olsen was the same one year?

Plus riders were seeded to different stages of their own qualifying rounds too...

It annoys me when I hear people complain about the top guys being "seeded" these days. They are NOT seeded. They have to qualify by competing against the world's top riders for a whole GP season the previous year.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, iris123 said:

You'll have to point out which quali meetings Briggo rode in ,in 1958 

I also am finding it difficult to find Fundin in the Nordic, Continental or European Finals in 1957

OK..I admit my interest and experience of WC speedway started in the early 60’s, but if anyone was seeded from that time I apologise for my error.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, iris123 said:

You'll have to point out which quali meetings Briggo rode in ,in 1958 

I also am finding it difficult to find Fundin in the Nordic, Continental or European Finals in 1957

My experience of WC speedway started in the early 60’s. If any rider was seeded from then I apologise for my error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, customhouseregular said:

My experience of WC speedway started in the early 60’s. If any rider was seeded from then I apologise for my error.

Several times, Ole Olsen was seeded directly to the Nordic Final, and a couple of times, he reached the World Final after riding in only two meetings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chunky said:

I'm sure Olsen was the same one year?

Plus riders were seeded to different stages of their own qualifying rounds too...

It annoys me when I hear people complain about the top guys being "seeded" these days. They are NOT seeded. They have to qualify by competing against the world's top riders for a whole GP season the previous year.

I think the point I am trying is make is being missed. Unless I am wrong no rider in say 1966 could become WC without qualifying from at least one meeting in 1966. I don’t remember Bjorn Knutsson being seeded to the 1966 final as reigning champion. In essence the GP’s are a World Final spread over a series of rounds. Without the Russian ban Laguta would have been in this year’s WF series, not having had to qualify this year. Therefore Mauger, Fundin and Briggs were at a disadvantage in the 60’s and 70’s compared to Laguta, Hancock and Woffinden. Under the GP system riders are seeded on the basis of the previous year. The previous generation were not. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, customhouseregular said:

I think the point I am trying is make is being missed. Unless I am wrong no rider in say 1966 could become WC without qualifying from at least one meeting in 1966. I don’t remember Bjorn Knutsson being seeded to the 1966 final as reigning champion. In essence the GP’s are a World Final spread over a series of rounds. Without the Russian ban Laguta would have been in this year’s WF series, not having had to qualify this year. Therefore Mauger, Fundin and Briggs were at a disadvantage in the 60’s and 70’s compared to Laguta, Hancock and Woffinden. Under the GP system riders are seeded on the basis of the previous year. The previous generation were not. 

To summarise… I believe at the end of the series every rider should have to qualify for a next series. We may end up with a completely different field, but Mauger, Fundin and Briggs proved the best will usually come through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, customhouseregular said:

I think the point I am trying is make is being missed. Unless I am wrong no rider in say 1966 could become WC without qualifying from at least one meeting in 1966. I don’t remember Bjorn Knutsson being seeded to the 1966 final as reigning champion. In essence the GP’s are a World Final spread over a series of rounds. Without the Russian ban Laguta would have been in this year’s WF series, not having had to qualify this year. Therefore Mauger, Fundin and Briggs were at a disadvantage in the 60’s and 70’s compared to Laguta, Hancock and Woffinden. Under the GP system riders are seeded on the basis of the previous year. The previous generation were not. 

No. "Seeding" is qualifying without competing, which is NOT what the GP riders do. They qualify from their performances the previous year, which is by far the hardest means of qualification, particularly for riders like Lambert, Fricke, and Thomsen. They are up against the very best the sport has to offer several times a year. Coming through a handful of qualifying meetings against mediocre riders is a lot easier than QUALIFYING from the GP's themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, chunky said:

No. "Seeding" is qualifying without competing, which is NOT what the GP riders do. They qualify from their performances the previous year, which is by far the hardest means of qualification, particularly for riders like Lambert, Fricke, and Thomsen. They are up against the very best the sport has to offer several times a year. Coming through a handful of qualifying meetings against mediocre riders is a lot easier than QUALIFYING from the GP's themselves.

Let’s agree to differ shall we?. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy