Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Plymouth Gladiators 2022


Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, torpointfanatic22 said:

So has Lawson jumped ship then or not? Is Garry May still going to be at Plymouth next season? If Kennett is number 1, can Plymouth seriously be better than the bottom 3 again?

I find it unbelievable that neither promotion has said anything.

Kennett no1? If that's the case maybe Plymouth are having strength in depth?

Well Poole aren't announcing any signings til Dec apparently. So that leaves Plymouth. Maybe they will say something when they have a replacement? If the Polish press was correct of course. They always seem to be though! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, torpointfanatic22 said:

So has Lawson jumped ship then or not? Is Garry May still going to be at Plymouth next season? If Kennett is number 1, can Plymouth seriously be better than the bottom 3 again?

I find it unbelievable that neither promotion has said anything.

Maybe there is nothing to say...........?!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Ghosty said:

What are Gary May's team plans now that Richard Lawson has jumped ship & Eddie Kennett's average was mis calculated (so we are told).

Next signing might be Mark Phillip's "nephew".

With all the riders averages changing due to Eastbourne's demise, I would think all of the Eastbourne riders would be the same so Kennett & Newman would fall back to their 2019 average.

Edited by IronScorpion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lisa-colette said:

Think there is an issue with taking out the Eastbourne meetings. 

Seems to be taking forever to sort out only raced 11 meetings

Edited by Normski
add text
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to me that there are two, not necessarily linked, issues with regard to the Eastbourne fixtures.

1. The Eastbourne match results are logically removed from the league tables, no argument.

2. The points scored by riders in the Eastbourne fixtures should, in my opinion, stand for the purposes of calculating averages. Those rides were seriously contested at that time and represent the ability of those riders at that moment. Therefore they should contribute to averages going forward. For sure, it would make the calculation of all riders averages a damn sight simpler.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, False dawn said:

It seems to me that there are two, not necessarily linked, issues with regard to the Eastbourne fixtures.

1. The Eastbourne match results are logically removed from the league tables, no argument.

2. The points scored by riders in the Eastbourne fixtures should, in my opinion, stand for the purposes of calculating averages. Those rides were seriously contested at that time and represent the ability of those riders at that moment. Therefore they should contribute to averages going forward. For sure, it would make the calculation of all riders averages a damn sight simpler.

I was going to say I tend to agree as it's not like riders weren't paid for it... But then that wouldn't be strictly true either

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, False dawn said:

It seems to me that there are two, not necessarily linked, issues with regard to the Eastbourne fixtures.

1. The Eastbourne match results are logically removed from the league tables, no argument.

2. The points scored by riders in the Eastbourne fixtures should, in my opinion, stand for the purposes of calculating averages. Those rides were seriously contested at that time and represent the ability of those riders at that moment. Therefore they should contribute to averages going forward. For sure, it would make the calculation of all riders averages a damn sight simpler.

I agree there is no reason to remove the Eastbourne matches from the rolling averages! Those matches were raced under the same rules as every other league match, apart from being unfair on Kennett upping his ave, it's also a lot simpler to just leave them in!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, szkocjasid said:

I agree there is no reason to remove the Eastbourne matches from the rolling averages! Those matches were raced under the same rules as every other league match, apart from being unfair on Kennett upping his ave, it's also a lot simpler to just leave them in!

As Eastbourne wirhdrew from the league then any rider who rode against or for them should have his average adjustef accordingly, otherwise Eastbourne should still appear in the league table. You cannot expunge the team record without also expunging any points from riders who rode either for or against them from them.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy