Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Scorpions v Bandits 02.07.2021


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Bandit59 said:

Kasper has to fulfill a Danish meeting on Saturday with a lunchtime start and as he's not ride for Berwick they can't claim his services.

Thank you, have you ever thought about doing the official site, you seem to more than they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Paulco said:

So to be clear about this ......Berwick can't use r/r for Anderson because he hasn't rode a meeting for them this season , so they have to revert to using r/r for Garcia - who hasn't rode a meeting for them this season 

That’s the usual practice - ‘revert’ to the previous declaration. It’s not a problem in this instance, but could be a big problem if the averages had changed making the move impossible once Andersen is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair the rules are clear and explicit on this....... 

'No facility is permitted to replace a rider, who although included in a redeclaration has not made an appearance for that team since being redeclared.'

Kasper has already been declared, so I guess its a national league guest, is Ryan Kinsley eligible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, screm said:

I`d love to know why Anderson isnt at Scunthorpe tomorrow night, is he available for Saturday`s meeting with Newcastle. You get the feeling rule makers put the rules together in pencil so they be rubbed out and replaced by something different.

He is not available for Sat because of a mid-day fixture in Denmark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eric i said:

To be fair the rules are clear and explicit on this....... 

'No facility is permitted to replace a rider, who although included in a redeclaration has not made an appearance for that team since being redeclared.'

Kasper has already been declared, so I guess its a national league guest, is Ryan Kinsley eligible?

Maybe Berwick have re-declared their original re-declaration. Once Saturday`s with Newcastle is over they will revert to their original re-declaration and re-declare their team with Anderson in it all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

That’s the usual practice - ‘revert’ to the previous declaration. It’s not a problem in this instance, but could be a big problem if the averages had changed making the move impossible once Andersen is available.

I know , it's just amusing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, screm said:

Maybe Berwick have re-declared their original re-declaration. Once Saturday`s with Newcastle is over they will revert to their original re-declaration and re-declare their team with Anderson in it all over again.

But what about the rule that states......

'A rider taken out of a team cannot be re-introduced in that team within 14 days.'

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, eric i said:

But what about the rule that states......

'A rider taken out of a team cannot be re-introduced in that team within 14 days.'

 

Has he been taken out of the team, or not introduced yet……? By reverting does the new declaration cease to exist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

Has he been taken out of the team, or not introduced yet……? By reverting does the new declaration cease to exist?

He appears on latest greensheet/ team declarations, so to say it ceases to exist would be odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, screm said:

Thank you, have you ever thought about doing the official site, you seem to more than they do.

Just read it in the Dirt Extra Sarah and James mentioned it I'm no that bright lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eric i said:

He appears on latest greensheet/ team declarations, so to say it ceases to exist would be odd.

My post was tongue in cheek, but that is in essence how a 'reversion' works, Berwick's issue 4 declaration is ignored and they rewind to the issue 3 declaration (which then impacts on issue 5). Fortunately reversions don't happen very often :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

My post was tongue in cheek, but that is in essence how a 'reversion' works, Berwick's issue 4 declaration is ignored and they rewind to the issue 3 declaration (which then impacts on issue 5). Fortunately reversions don't happen very often :-)

Does it say this anywhere in the rules? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Andersen declared in the Berwick 1-7 for the (postponed) match against Glasgow?  IF he was, then surely they can't revert back?

Also, when was the Danish match re-arranged? Was it after Andersen signed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, eric i said:

Does it say this anywhere in the rules? 

From memory, it's an unwritten rule ......

27 minutes ago, StevePark said:

Was Andersen declared in the Berwick 1-7 for the (postponed) match against Glasgow?  IF he was, then surely they can't revert back?

Also, when was the Danish match re-arranged? Was it after Andersen signed?

Andersen is currently in the declared 1-7, but yes they can revert back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy