Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Is anyone losing interest


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, topaz325 said:

Brexit, thatcher, The summer of 76, the Danish invasion, the Swedish invasion, the Polish invasion, the Australian invasion, the Poll tax riots....

Think the Trumpton riots were the last straw for the Chigley track

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being not too good at pasting links, but surely someone will be able to do it.

Has anyone seen Belle Vue Colts, Paul Bowen basic analysis of what's wrong with speedway on Youtube.

A good watch and analysis.

The main mitigating factor for me is no promoting of the sport in the towns and cities where it is staged, period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mikebv said:

The Chigley Heathens....?

A better name would have been the Chigley 'Wigglies"...  Their line-up was:

1 - Flack (Capt)
2 - Pugh
3 - Pugh
4 - Barney McGrew
5 - Cuthbert
6 - Dibble
7 - Grubb

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Ringitsneck said:

‘ is anyone losing interest ‘ asks the title ?, well no as you ask. I find the ‘ sport ‘ fascinating now as individual promoters find their own interpretation of the rules ( are there any now ?). Having seen Poole’s and now Birmingham’s line ups for there next matches I am constantly entertained.  A facility granted for a rider who hasn’t ridden for you when that was against the rules but now isn’t ?. A guest for an ‘ injured ‘ rider ( injured in this country allegedly )who is now riding in his own country but not here ? I used to think I understood most of the rules but not any more.

I don’t think we can call speedway a sport for much longer as sports have rules, not guidelines to be used to increase an advantage for some but not all.

It's nothing new though is it?

One of the last straws for me was in 2010 when Brum wanted to re-declare due to a long term injury for Chris Kerr. 2 other teams, Berwick and Stoke were in the same position. They were allowed to, Birmingham were denied. The BSPA chairman was Alex Harkess and Brummies were dicing with Edinburgh for the league that year. Draw your own conclusions. 

Speedway is like a form of water torture for many fans who eventually succumb and walk away. Fair play to the people who can put up with the nonsense, there'd be no speedway without them.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, OGT said:

It's nothing new though is it?

One of the last straws for me was in 2010 when Brum wanted to re-declare due to a long term injury for Chris Kerr. 2 other teams, Berwick and Stoke were in the same position. They were allowed to, Birmingham were denied. The BSPA chairman was Alex Harkess and Brummies were dicing with Edinburgh for the league that year. Draw your own conclusions. 

Speedway is like a form of water torture for many fans who eventually succumb and walk away. Fair play to the people who can put up with the nonsense, there'd be no speedway without them.

Something not dissimilar happend to Oxford in 1985 when Belle Vue visited Cowley. The Belle Vue Promoter was Stuart Bamforth and he also was BSPA chairman at the time. Oxford had declared Klaus Lausch in their line up which Belle Vue would have been aware of when teams were declared but they left it until just prior to the meeting when Bamforth wearing his BSPA hat made an objection knowing full well the circumstances and Oxford were forced to use a junior (Jon Surman) Okay Oxford were wrong in that the paperwork hadn't been cleared and Bamforth would have been well aware of that but used his position of power to influence the line up of the Oxford team who could have re-instated Melvyn Taylor as  a replacement. Bamforth took advantage of his position but remained tight lipped much to the annoyance of Oxford Promoter Bernard Crapper who took to the microphone during the interval venting his anger after Oxford had trounced the "Aces".

I recall also in 1977 when the "Rebels" arrived at Hackney and programmed to ride as a guest was Mick Hines but Len Silver left it right until the start of the meeting before making an objection (Mick had appeared at Waterden Road only the week before). The fact that Mick's name was listed in the programme and Silver would have been aware of the situation the episode left a sour taste in one's mouth but it only pumped up the "Rebels" and they beat the "Hawks" in a last heat decider!

Edited by steve roberts
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, steve roberts said:

Something not dissimilar happend to Oxford in 1985 when Belle Vue visited Cowley. The Belle Vue Promoter was Stuart Bamforth and he also was BSPA chairman at the time. Oxford had declared Klaus Lausch in their line up which Belle Vue would have been aware of when teams were declared but they left it until just prior to the meeting when Bamforth wearing his BSPA hat made an objection knowing full well the circumstances and Oxford were forced to use a junior (Jon Surman) Okay Oxford were wrong in that the paperwork hadn't been cleared and Bamforth would have been well aware of that but used his position of power to influence the line up of the Oxford team who could have re-instated Melvyn Taylor as  a replacement. Bamforth took advantage of his position but remained tight lipped much to the annoyance of Oxford Promoter Bernard Crapper who took to the microphone during the interval venting his anger after Oxford had trounced the "Aces".

I recall also in 1977 when the "Rebels" arrived at Hackney and programmed to ride as a guest was Mick Hines but Len Silver left it right until the start of the meeting before making an objection (Mick had appeared at Waterden Road only the week before). The fact that Mick's name was listed in the programme and Silver would have been aware of the situation the episode left a sour taste in one's mouth but it only pumped up the "Rebels" and they beat the "Hawks" in a last heat decider!

Two examples of why the current system of authorising line-ups is an improvement. Race-night challenges are now a thing of the past.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

Two examples of why the current system of authorising line-ups is an improvement. Race-night challenges are now a thing of the past.

Still far too many ridiculous situations happen though Neil for the sport to ever be taken seriously.. 

So sad really that something with so much potential can never get it realised when so much nonsense is (actively allowed and accepted), to take place, year on year...

Still, I presume all the promoters must be happy with their lot to keep doing such things ad Infinitum.. ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OGT said:

It's nothing new though is it?

One of the last straws for me was in 2010 when Brum wanted to re-declare due to a long term injury for Chris Kerr. 2 other teams, Berwick and Stoke were in the same position. They were allowed to, Birmingham were denied. The BSPA chairman was Alex Harkess and Brummies were dicing with Edinburgh for the league that year. Draw your own conclusions. 

Speedway is like a form of water torture for many fans who eventually succumb and walk away. Fair play to the people who can put up with the nonsense, there'd be no speedway without them.

You do have to "collude" with the Promoters when you attend a Speedway match that it is "real" within a true sporting context..

Which is not a great starting point is it to a) keep its regular fanbase,  b) grow its fanbase further, c) get some major sponsors involved and d) be taken seriously by the wider mainstream media..

Some will do it though and be willing to accept anything put out in front of them..

And fair play to them for that, as without them the sport would be in serious trouble..

However, they will inevitably only ever be the smaller minority of the (very large),  number of fans who still follow the sport closely, but from a greater distance...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

Two examples of why the current system of authorising line-ups is an improvement. Race-night challenges are now a thing of the past.

...Ian Thomas was a classic example of utilising the rules to suit his own ends. Well known story when Tony Coupland challenged Thomas's continual use of the R/R facility for the missing Robbie Gardner when both his average and the fact that he had retired should heve been picked up by the authorities and the match referee in particular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mikebv said:

Still far too many ridiculous situations happen though Neil for the sport to ever be taken seriously.. 

So sad really that something with so much potential can never get it realised when so much nonsense is (actively allowed and accepted), to take place, year on year...

Still, I presume all the promoters must be happy with their lot to keep doing such things ad Infinitum.. ?

 

 

Not sure if they’re happy with their lot - more than one promoter has gone public this year with his disillusionment.

Edited by NeilWatson
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, mikebv said:

You do have to "collude" with the Promoters when you attend a Speedway match that it is "real" within a true sporting context..

 

That's a great encapsulation of British league speedway. However with a few exceptions ( e.g. BL2/NL in the 70s) that's pretty much been the state for over 50 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, arnieg said:

That's a great encapsulation of British league speedway. However with a few exceptions ( e.g. BL2/NL in the 70s) that's pretty much been the state for over 50 years

100% Arnie..

However...

The sport used to go out nationally to millions most Saturdays in summer, when ITV showed the worlds best in "Big 'proper' competitons"...

Domestic British Speedway then fed (extremely well), off it's very large amount of crumbs falling off the table..

There was also often zero advanced warning of what you were going to see when you got into the stadiums, you had paid your money and you were in...

Any "moaning" was done to those around you and was discussed by half a dozen or so at most..

Whereas now any "nonsense" (and let's be honest there is far too much), is known well in advance, discussed via the thousands on the internet, and often will then lead to comments along the lines of "Well that's me out then, I am not going to watch that"...

A very, very different modern world that unfortunately UK Speedway hasnt appreciated and adapted its operating model to...

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the 80% and early 90s I used to rely on the speedway star or speedway mail for news on upcoming meetings but in those days and until the late 2000s I would go anyway.

But even the internet isn’t always helpful, I recall Arena Essex going to Swindon in the pairs final in 2003, a load of fans went and when we got their found out that Joonas Kylmakorpi wasn’t there and was never going to be there, Mr Russell kept it quiet much to everyone anger.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, marko said:

Back in the 80% and early 90s I used to rely on the speedway star or speedway mail for news on upcoming meetings but in those days and until the late 2000s I would go anyway.

But even the internet isn’t always helpful, I recall Arena Essex going to Swindon in the pairs final in 2003, a load of fans went and when we got their found out that Joonas Kylmakorpi wasn’t there and was never going to be there, Mr Russell kept it quiet much to everyone anger.

That old chestnut was used all the time, pre internet!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes Cityrebel and pre internet you could understand it to a point, but once the internet came about there was no excuse for just being honest, it was a meeting at another track, Ronnie had nothing to lose by being honest with the fans, instead he caused resentment which may have affected his home gates moving forward.

I personally would still consider going to a meeting if a promoter was open and honest up front, the promoters do not like the internet because it spoils their ability to fleece the fans and exposes all their wrong doings.

They would  rather tell a lie and say sorry than tell the truth and seek sympathy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy