Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Peterborough v Wolves 14/6


Recommended Posts

Entertaining meeting.

Easy to say now given the start to the season but if they stay injury free this Peterborough side does look as though they will be tough to beat. Pedersen, Andersen, Nicholls and Harris might not be consistent enough to be genuine No.1s anymore but they're all still capable on a good day. Palm-Toft is also a solid rider at this level so you only need 2 of those 5 to have a good meeting and the rest to do okay. Always going to have a strong reserve as well. 

As Dan Christian, Notts T20 cricket captain, said last year - "Old blokes win stuff"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, The Cheese said:

Entertaining meeting.

Easy to say now given the start to the season but if they stay injury free this Peterborough side does look as though they will be tough to beat. Pedersen, Andersen, Nicholls and Harris might not be consistent enough to be genuine No.1s anymore but they're all still capable on a good day. Palm-Toft is also a solid rider at this level so you only need 2 of those 5 to have a good meeting and the rest to do okay. Always going to have a strong reserve as well. 

As Dan Christian, Notts T20 cricket captain, said last year - "Old blokes win stuff"

Exactly what i said when Peterborough won at our place last week. 2 out of 5 riders in double figures and the other 3 scoring between 5-8 and a good reserve and they will win lots of matches 

I dont get why people cant understand why Palin was taken out of heat 14, Lyon made the correct call.

Some have also said why is Palin not at 7.............i guess its a fine line between winning matches and trying to give Palin track time.

If Palin was at 7 he would have met Flint twice more and Becker and Morris...........races that Ully at home might (and did) beat those riders...... no guarantee that Palin would have beaten Flint and unlikely he would have beaten Morris and Becker

If Ully was at 7 he would have had been up against Douglas, Masters, Becker and Morris and might not have scored as many

What im saying is that its as broad as its long.

Ully at 6 might have dropped 3 more points say and Palin at 7 might have added 1 or 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Beowulf said:

"Should have" not should of. Think of it logically, if you can already ride a particular type then you should ride a type that is not natural to you to improve your all round ability.

Thanks for the grammer lesson i try be better next time i write  post   which is best for a rider who wants to earn as much money as he can logically or financially ,he riding the worst track in the premiership at the moment not gunner learn or earn that much 

Oops naughty bad grammer again 

Edited by scoobydoo
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, scoobydoo said:

Thanks for the grammer lesson i try be better next time i write  post   which is best for a rider who wants to earn as much money as he can logically or financially ,he riding the worst track in the premiership at the moment not gunner learn or earn that much 

Oops naughty bad grammer again 

You is funny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Noodles said:

Wolves could have used Broc Nicol in heat 14. 

Could have yes, however he hadn’t looked like troubling the scorers so what was the point. 

2 hours ago, Midland Red said:

Showground showed up Monmore Green as far as a proper track is concerned. Riders could race, instead of concentrating on staying on their machines.

They are all proper UK tracks. :rolleyes:

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chrismorton said:

If you was in a pub would you correct a stranger on they're grammar?...no, because you would probably get punched in the face...so don't do it on here unless you want to be hated...no one likes a smart arse..

I wasn't trying to be a smart arse and strangely the original recipient of the post ScoobyDoo didn't seem to take it as badly as you.

Personally, the use of "should of" drives me insane. It is mainly used by younger people. it comes from should have being shortened to should've which indeed looks like "should of", so it is understandable.

Anyway, to keep you happy it won't be mentioned again. Okay ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, chrismorton said:

If you was in a pub would you correct a stranger on they're grammar?...no, because you would probably get punched in the face...so don't do it on here unless you want to be hated...no one likes a smart arse..

After reading this post it's understandable why you are not keen  on having grammar errors highlighted.:)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy