ONTWOMINUTES Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 22 minutes ago, Pinny said: https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/16202734.internet-paedophile-jailed-also-making-621-secret-films-people-urinating-music-festivals/ thats SCB. do you feel happy with him posting on this forum? Hanging would be too good for see you next Tuesdays like that. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch958 Posted May 9 Author Report Share Posted May 9 I think I would have been more careful about my user name and admissions as to my past, going to be difficult for him to continue on here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloom89 Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 1 hour ago, Pinny said: And then was caught again after being released. https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/24046260.newport-man-images-people-urinating-bristol-area/ and you have people making jokes about it and welcoming him back. Baffling to say the least. these crimes are on another level to anything Garrity done. And yet here he is commenting on a forum as if nothing has happened!!!! The sentencing he got or rather lack of is a joke! The bloke is an absolute beast. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chunky Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 1 hour ago, Pinny said: https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/16202734.internet-paedophile-jailed-also-making-621-secret-films-people-urinating-music-festivals/ thats SCB. do you feel happy with him posting on this forum? If he posts sensible stuff, yes. Why should he not be allowed to post on a speedway forum? You don't think he should be allowed to talk to people? Probably not... Yes, what he did was bad; very bad. However, addictions - good or bad - can be considered an "illness", and like regular afflictions, there is treatment for them. I hope to God that he has been cured, but at least he owns up to his own issues. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bojangles Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 24 minutes ago, chunky said: If he posts sensible stuff, yes. Why should he not be allowed to post on a speedway forum? You don't think he should be allowed to talk to people? Probably not... Yes, what he did was bad; very bad. However, addictions - good or bad - can be considered an "illness", and like regular afflictions, there is treatment for them. I hope to God that he has been cured, but at least he owns up to his own issues. The guy is attracted to kids, that's not something you cure. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioness Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 1 hour ago, chunky said: If he posts sensible stuff, yes. Why should he not be allowed to post on a speedway forum? You don't think he should be allowed to talk to people? Probably not... Yes, what he did was bad; very bad. However, addictions - good or bad - can be considered an "illness", and like regular afflictions, there is treatment for them. I hope to God that he has been cured, but at least he owns up to his own issues. 'Cured'? Have another look at Pinny's posts - the second link shows that he has already re-offended 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralMelchett Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 1 hour ago, Lioness said: 'Cured'? Have another look at Pinny's posts - the second link shows that he has already re-offended I was aware of what he had been sent to prison for yes, however I wasn't aware then since release there had been another incident! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioness Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 28 minutes ago, GeneralMelchett said: I was aware of what he had been sent to prison for yes, however I wasn't aware then since release there had been another incident! Neither was I, it wasnt the sort of thing I would look for but Pinny posted and included a link to the appropriate press report Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralMelchett Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Lioness said: Neither was I, it wasnt the sort of thing I would look for but Pinny posted and included a link to the appropriate press report Yes I read it also - yeah not much to say really other than that’s the ‘one second chance blown’ in a way! I always say people deserve one go at redemption and it’s up to them to take it! Edited May 9 by GeneralMelchett 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin king junior Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 On 5/7/2024 at 10:28 PM, SCB said: Probably going to regret this but here goes... I'll start with the boring factual stuff. Almost all people sentenced to time in prison in the UK serve 50% before release "on licence". It's only if you get over (4 years I think) that you depending on your sentence (as set by the judge) either get 66% in prison, or have to apply for parole. I "think" Jason would have had to apply for parole, parole is almost always rejected at the first attempt. So if Jason has been released at attempt one then he has been very well behaved. That means no fighting, arguing, disagreements, dirty looks, attending courses (that's time spent with psychologists). It means he's worked damn hard. Next bit. Should Jason be allowed to be a speedway rider? Long term forum members will remember me, I idioted up, I went to prison. I met many people who were somewhere between absolute wrong 'uns who IMO should never seen the light of day to people who idioted up and will (are?!) be good people who will add to society on release. Where does Jason fit? Well IMO, he's more on the a bit stupid, but probably knows it and wants to make good but his intelligence makes it hard to explain that. Would I give him a chance? Yes but with very, very strict rules that if he so much as answers back the manger he is sacked. Why? Because I believe that everyone should be given a second chance (what a shock I think that eh?!). One of the reason I think people should get a second chance is, because as other have pointed out, what else can he do? Should he claim benefits for the next 50 years? Give him a purpose in life, trust me, it makes a massive difference. I would also be very wary of trusting anything in the press. Yes the crimes were committed but pleading guilty means you get almost no chance to put your side of the case across, also the press misrepresent things, which legally is allowed. Lies? Yep, sure as long as there is a vague basis of fact. So the press ask you for your side? Do they idiot! Thanks for your opinion. Now clear off you absolute nonce. This sport and community wants you nowhere near it. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ONTWOMINUTES Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 58 minutes ago, spin king junior said: Thanks for your opinion. Now clear off you absolute nonce. This sport and community wants you nowhere near it. Chunky doesn't mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chunky Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 (edited) 1 hour ago, ONTWOMINUTES said: Chunky doesn't mind Okay, so some simple - and honest - questions. Do you think that ex-cons should ALWAYS be considered cons? Do you think that they can redeem themselves, and become useful - even upstanding - members of the community? Should they ever be re-employed? Should they even be given the opportunity? Should they be locked up for life? Should they be deprived of any contact with the outside world for life? Should they simply be executed? Edited May 9 by chunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin king junior Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 (edited) 17 minutes ago, chunky said: Okay, so some simple - and honest - questions. Do you think that ex-cons should ALWAYS be considered cons? Do you think that they can redeem themselves, and become useful - even upstanding - members of the community? Should they ever be re-employed? Should they even be given the opportunity? Should they be locked up for life? Should they be deprived of any contact with the outside world for life? Should they simply be executed? When you're talking about someone who has distributed child porn then yes, they should absolutely be discluded from any normal public life. Honestly anyone who could remotely justify SCB actions need to look at themselves and think about what sort of person you are. Because there's no justification. He's a monster. Edited May 9 by spin king junior 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chunky Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 24 minutes ago, spin king junior said: When you're talking about someone who has distributed child porn then yes, they should absolutely be discluded from any normal public life. Honestly anyone who could remotely justify SCB actions need to look at themselves and think about what sort of person you are. Because there's no justification. He's a monster. No out is trying to justify his actions; there IS no justification. I am just trying to find out whether people believe in rehabilitation and atonement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin king junior Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 11 minutes ago, chunky said: No out is trying to justify his actions; there IS no justification. I am just trying to find out whether people believe in rehabilitation and atonement. If we're talking atonement in a religious sense then I can't discuss as I am in no way spiritual or religious, so it wouldn't be fair on me to comment. Rehabilitation- if we are talking to a normal public setting then absolutely not. Ultimately SCB cannot be trusted in a normal public setting. He has abused one of societies most innocent, those who don't know how and cannot protect themselves. And this isn't a mistake, this is repeated and consistent action that he as an adult has taken at abusing children. And I do not take these comments lightly - the things he has admitted to means he is a danger to children forever and we should not take that risk for granted. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chunky Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 1 hour ago, spin king junior said: If we're talking atonement in a religious sense then I can't discuss as I am in no way spiritual or religious, so it wouldn't be fair on me to comment. That is why I never referred to religion, as I didn't know your standing. 1 hour ago, spin king junior said: And this isn't a mistake, this is repeated and consistent action that he as an adult has taken at abusing children. Again, that's why I refuse use the term "mistake". It sickens me when people use the term "mistake" instead of "bad decision". They are not the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.D Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 6 hours ago, GeneralMelchett said: I was aware of what he had been sent to prison for yes, however I wasn't aware then since release there had been another incident! Yeah I didn't know that either, changed my mind now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodgy Posted May 10 Report Share Posted May 10 12 hours ago, Pinny said: https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/16202734.internet-paedophile-jailed-also-making-621-secret-films-people-urinating-music-festivals/ thats SCB. do you feel happy with him posting on this forum? Bloody hell!!! How the hell does this creature have the nerve to start commenting after such disgusting acts, which appear repeated after release. Despite trying to convince he was so regretful after the first sentence. Really goes to show how dangerous social media can be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orion Posted May 10 Report Share Posted May 10 9 hours ago, chunky said: No out is trying to justify his actions; there IS no justification. I am just trying to find out whether people believe in rehabilitation and atonement. Would all depend on what crime was..Drugs these are days are one way or another are linked to crime and in Garrity case drugs look like they have played a major part in his downfall..ive seen decent family members get hooked on drugs and do some shocking things like nick there nans bank book etc..But they have got clean and now are fine and decent people..People who commit sex crimes are unlikely to change and will always be a danger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinny Posted May 10 Report Share Posted May 10 I am only aware he re offended after a member on here sent a link across to me . People that deranged are always likely to reoffend. the fact of the matter is he shouldn't be allowed any access to the internet whatsoever. Scum like that only try harder to not get caught, not to stop being a monster. there are no doubt young kids who use this forum so to have a convicted paedophile who has reoffended lurking and posting is worrying. absolutely no way anyone with a sane mind can defend him and its ridiculous that people have. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts