Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Knockout Cup Draw


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, poole keith said:

do you think a bye is an advantage "hammer" surely its a missed opportunity for the club and riders to earn more,as a supporter i would prefer the extra meeting 

Unfortunately not running certain meetings can work out more profitable over a season than running them..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mikebv said:

Unfortunately not running certain meetings can work out more profitable over a season than running them..

I guess that if a club is worried about the number of meetings or the travelling distances involved, they could exclude themselves from the competition altogether. If the regulations allow for this, I dread to think what the reaction from officials and fans might be.

As they used to say in exams in my day ,"Manchester United withdraws from the FA Cup. Compare and discuss!".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/25/2020 at 10:45 AM, hammer1969 said:

Why call it a "draw" in the first place, us fans aren't stupid a draw is when names are put into a hat/container and picked at random and we all know these meetings are mostly arranged/sorted out, and guess what apparently Poole now get a 'buy' funny that!

How do Poole get a bye? Poole v Eastbourne in the first round!!

Edited by Skidder1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, poole keith said:

do you think a bye is an advantage "hammer" surely its a missed opportunity for the club and riders to earn more,as a supporter i would prefer the extra meeting 

I would also prefer an extra meeting but a team that gets knocked out in the first round get no further meetings anyway.  My personal opinion is that all clubs names should be put in a hat and picked at random, if trying to reduce travel distance for riders comes into the argument I dont believe it should as many of them ride for both leagues and some of them also ride abroad so why should us fans be denied a level playing field in what is called 'a knockout cup' it should be just that a knockout from 1st round to last round.  Not trying to get into an argument with fans differing opinions of this just saying how I personally feel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hammer1969 said:

My mistake, sorry, its Birmingham, Kent, Leicester and Somerset who get 1st round byes

10/05 Leicester v Berwick KOC 1st Round

23/05 Berwick v Leicester KOC 1st Round 2nd leg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hammer1969 said:

I seem to be getting myself into a right old muddle over this KO cup, can someone please enlighten me as to which teams if any have actually got a first round by.

On 27th November, the draw was announced as:

ROUND 1 DRAW: Poole v Edinburgh, Leicester v Berwick, Birmingham v Redcar, Somerset v Glasgow. Byes: Eastbourne, Kent, Newcastle, Scunthorpe.

QUARTER-FINAL DRAW: Scunthorpe v Kent, Birmingham/Redcar v Poole/Edinburgh, Somerset/Glasgow v Leicester/Berwick, Eastbourne v Newcastle.

The fixtures released on 23rd January appear to show:

ROUND 1 DRAW: Newcastle v Edinburgh, Leicester v Berwick, Birmingham v Redcar, Somerset v Glasgow. Byes: Eastbourne, Kent, Poole, Scunthorpe.

QUARTER-FINAL DRAW: Scunthorpe v Kent, Birmingham/Redcar v Newcastle/Edinburgh, Somerset/Glasgow v Leicester/Berwick, Eastbourne v Poole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, NeilWatson said:

On 27th November, the draw was announced as:

ROUND 1 DRAW: Poole v Edinburgh, Leicester v Berwick, Birmingham v Redcar, Somerset v Glasgow. Byes: Eastbourne, Kent, Newcastle, Scunthorpe.

QUARTER-FINAL DRAW: Scunthorpe v Kent, Birmingham/Redcar v Poole/Edinburgh, Somerset/Glasgow v Leicester/Berwick, Eastbourne v Newcastle.

The fixtures released on 23rd January appear to show:

ROUND 1 DRAW: Newcastle v Edinburgh, Leicester v Berwick, Birmingham v Redcar, Somerset v Glasgow. Byes: Eastbourne, Kent, Poole, Scunthorpe.

QUARTER-FINAL DRAW: Scunthorpe v Kent, Birmingham/Redcar v Newcastle/Edinburgh, Somerset/Glasgow v Leicester/Berwick, Eastbourne v Poole.

Seems pretty obvious to me- someone cocked up on writing down the names after the original draw and as soon as they realised they corrected it( under 2 months isn`t bad) :)

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, racers and royals said:

Seems pretty obvious to me- someone cocked up on writing down the names after the original draw and as soon as they realised they corrected it( under 2 months isn`t bad) :)

Easy mistake...I'm always getting my Poole Brown Ale mixed up with that other one. ;) :drink:

Edited by Bear_Bottom
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Skidder1 said:

The Eastbourne promoter has given his view and has accepted the BSPA  decision as to the reasons for the change - without saying anything about the actual reasons, other than that they were valid!!

That’s a surprise- i would have thought he would have rather met Newcastle with probably double the cost of meeting them rather than Poole which would be probably double the attendance !!!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, racers and royals said:

That’s a surprise- i would have thought he would have rather met Newcastle with probably double the cost of meeting them rather than Poole which would be probably double the attendance !!!

Maybe he knows Pooles last 2 riders and thinks they're an easier proposition than Newcastle! :)

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Richard Weston said:

He indicated the reasons were confidential but it was not for him to say what they were; indicating that any such announcement would have to come from the BSPA. 

Therefore, it is not his place to say what the reasons were.

 

 

I agree. It wasn't a criticism, just a comment!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Skidder1 said:

I agree. It wasn't a criticism, just a comment!!

 

So we now know the reason for Poole getting a bye after having been originally drawn to meet Newcastle in the 1st round,  the following is copied from the Poole website.

"The Poole management are keen to clarify the situation regarding the SGB Championship KO Cup draw, with their tie against the Eastbourne Eagles being confirmed as a second round tie.

Initially, the club had been drawn to face Edinburgh in the first round but trying to slot an early cup date into the club's busy start of season campaign encountered a number of logistical problems, particularly as the Pirates, back on Wednesday night racing, have to share the date with Birmingham and Somerset (together with Kent) and do not have the 'grandfather' rights over those two already established Championship clubs.  Newcastle, originally drawn with a bye to the second round, had greater flexibility in the early weeks of the season and so, rather than risk delaying the competition unnecessarily, the two promotions reached an agreement, sanctioned by the BSPA that the Diamond's  would take Poole's place in the first round. The Pirates were then subsequently drawn against Eastbourne, who along with Kent and Scunthorpe were routed into the second round.

Poole promoter Dan Ford explained "Our fixture list is pretty much very packed out in the first couple of months of the season and fitting in an early round cup tie was proving impractical. We spoke with the Newcastle promotion and reached a sensible compromise. The switch between us and Newcastle made sense on so many levels and so we jointly made the approach to the governing body to allow this to happen.

The Pirates will race the cup tie against Eastbourne on 10th June (home) and 14th June (away)."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy