Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Newcastle 2020


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Aceslider said:

Yes that is a point.

Just suppose you took the view that there was no VAT output to declare on sale of the magazine, it doesn't take a maths genius to work out the potential underdeclaration of VAT going back to the point when programmes became magazines, if HMRC did not accept the terminology. Whatever the hypothetical underpayment might be, interest and penalties would then need to be added. Could quickly turn a solvent company into an insolvent one.

As you say, could rumble on for a while. I wonder whether they will take the view that there is no point in pursuing given the lack of assets?

To a large extent, from the sound of things, it is now academic so far as the new promotion is concerned, which is great news for Newcastle Speedway

To be fair it's a bit more complicated than that with regards to VAT and whether there are assets or not they pursue the individual or the Directors... hence everyone could spend unpaid tax revenues then fold a company to negate the need to pay said tax and that's when there is a risk of prosecution... Honestly I would be seriously worried if I was a former director and when you look at companies house you see it boils down to one director and one person who signed off the accounts

A quick internet search and you can see once the figures get towards the 100k mark then the HMRC see the value in putting the effort in to try and reclaim the unpaid taxes...

There maybe trouble ahead...

Regards 

THJ 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TotallyHonestJohn said:

To be fair it's a bit more complicated than that with regards to VAT and whether there are assets or not they pursue the individual or the Directors... hence everyone could spend unpaid tax revenues then fold a company to negate the need to pay said tax and that's when there is a risk of prosecution... Honestly I would be seriously worried if I was a former director and when you look at companies house you see it boils down to one director and one person who signed off the accounts

A quick internet search and you can see once the figures get towards the 100k mark then the HMRC see the value in putting the effort in to try and reclaim the unpaid taxes...

There maybe trouble ahead...

Regards 

THJ 

 

The company's net assets shown by the last filed accounts at 30 November 2018 only amounted to £25K.

The following season one imagines in financial terms would have been "difficult" so it is difficult to envisage any improvement on £25k and probably in reality a reduction from that value.

Can't really see HMRC getting too excited in all honesty although they might arguably have a claim ahead of other unpaid unsecured creditors if there are any.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aceslider said:

The company's net assets shown by the last filed accounts at 30 November 2018 only amounted to £25K.

The following season one imagines in financial terms would have been "difficult" so it is difficult to envisage any improvement on £25k and probably in reality a reduction from that value.

Can't really see HMRC getting too excited in all honesty although they might arguably have a claim ahead of other unpaid unsecured creditors if there are any.

Honeslty 

There are no other unpaid unsecured creditors you have had that from the horses mouth.. If there were still issues the liquidators would deem RG an unfit director and he would be prevented from running the new venture... there is a mountain of case law on this and the issue is more technical than you may appreciate...

That's why the issue has to be with VAT and you only pay the difference on your purchases and sales so very simply put if I was a taxi driver and put 60 quid of juice in my vehicle 10 quid of that is VAT what I have paid... so I take 5 people x 12 quid in fares and that equates to 50 quid for me and 10 quid VAT so I dont pay the VAT man anything... now I take another 5 fares at 12 quid and the VAT man now wants 10 quid off me and this keeps rolling on...

Now look at all the items that attract VAT at the Speedway... like Sponsorship... Season Tickets... Gate Money... Shop Sales... Car Park Money and any other revenue that the club gets (except a zero rated match day magazine) and off set them against any outgoings.... VAT registered riders wages... fuels... plant maintenance and equipment... shale and track costs and any other expenditure (like producing a match day magazine) that the club needs to pay out and there are more examples on both sides of the equation... however you invariably end up with a positive towards the VAT man.... 

I am being a bit simplistic here but it is basically the mechanics of the thing...

They (HMRC) are going back to 2013 apparently and I will bet anything you want that this is the issue and I don't know for sure what the figures are but many small businesses on similar turnovers can rack up between 3 to 8 grand a quarter so a VAT bill of 12 to 32k per annum...

So take the mid point of that lot and 6 x 24k comes out at 144k and if my fag packet figures are correct then HMRC will be interviewing people...

Rest assured and you can take that to the bank Tax Free...

Regards 

THJ 

Edited by TotallyHonestJohn
Missed out word
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, TotallyHonestJohn said:

Honeslty 

There are no other unpaid unsecured creditors you have had that from the horses mouth.. If there were still issues the liquidators would deem RG an unfit director and he would be prevented from running the new venture... there is a mountain of case law on this and the issue is more technical than you may appreciate...

That's why the issue has to be with VAT and you only pay the difference on your purchases and sales so very simply put if I was a taxi driver and put 60 quid of juice in my vehicle 10 quid of that is VAT what I have paid... so I take 5 people x 12 quid in fares and that equates to 50 quid for me and 10 quid VAT so I dont pay the VAT man anything... now I take another 5 fares at 12 quid and the VAT man now wants 10 quid off me and this keeps rolling on...

Now look at all the items that attract VAT at the Speedway... like Sponsorship... Season Tickets... Gate Money... Shop Sales... Car Park Money and any other revenue that the club gets (except a zero rated match day magazine) and off set them against any outgoings.... VAT registered riders wages... fuels... plant maintenance and equipment... shale and track costs and any other expenditure (like producing a match day magazine) that the club needs to pay out and there are more examples on both sides of the equation... however you invariably end up with a positive towards the VAT man.... 

I am being a bit simplistic here but it is basically the mechanics of the thing...

They (HMRC) are going back to 2013 apparently and I will bet anything you want that this is the issue and I don't know for sure what the figures are but many small businesses on similar turnovers can rack up between 3 to 8 grand a quarter so a VAT bill of 12 to 32k per annum...

So take the mid point of that lot and 6 x 24k comes out at 144k and if my fag packet figures are correct then HMRC will be interviewing people...

Rest assured and you can take that to the bank Tax Free...

Regards 

THJ 

THJ you trying to get me into bother man you know I'm a very HONEST taxi driver 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

a footballer is not meant to give a speech at his testimonial events though or it becomes chargeable!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, pienpeesman said:

THJ you trying to get me into bother man you know I'm a very HONEST taxi driver 

Didn't think there was one.:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/28/2020 at 7:29 PM, arnieg said:

Can I point out programmes are zero rated. However racecards are standard rated as they are principally for filling in. The HMRC leaflet on leaflets (!) and other printed materials provides very precise guidelines. 

For example a political or marketing leaflet is zero rated unless more than one third of it is a coupon or survey for filling in, detaching and returning.

I believe the Sheffield 'pizza menu' racecards of a few years back were VATable, but in general speedway programmes will be zero rated.

I thought the issue was

A programme has more pages of adverts than text and is vatable

A magazine has more text than adverts and is not vatable

Sheffields racecard was all adverts and racecard so vat was due.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, toontrader said:

I thought the issue was

A programme has more pages of adverts than text and is vatable

A magazine has more text than adverts and is not vatable

Sheffields racecard was all adverts and racecard so vat was due.

 

A magazine consisting entirely of adverts would still be zero rated. Advertising leaflets are zero rated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/30/2020 at 11:04 PM, arnieg said:

A magazine consisting entirely of adverts would still be zero rated. Advertising leaflets are zero rated.

Honestly 

When it all comes out (if it ever does) I think it will be more than the none payment of VAT on a few clarty match day magazine's that may or may not attract a VAT levy

Regards 

THJ 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/29/2020 at 10:15 AM, geoff100 said:

A football player can have a benefit match  ( cant spell test*****) and doesnt pat tax yet a poor coach driver gets stung for tax on any tips he might get lol , just saying.

That's because his  testimonial is usually organised by a committee separated from his  club ( his employer )  so it's classed as a one of gift rather than earnings coming from his employer and is exempt from tax

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TotallyHonestJohn said:

Honestly 

When it all comes out (if it ever does) I think it will be more than the none payment of VAT on a few clarty match day magazine's that may or may not attract a VAT levy

Regards 

THJ 

There's no 'may or may not' about it, they definitely don't. Presumably you are alleging they did not account for VAT on a material part of their income (maybe sponsorship or under declared gate receipts?) or simply failed in their basic VAT compliance issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, arnieg said:

There's no 'may or may not' about it, they definitely don't. Presumably you are alleging they did not account for VAT on a material part of their income (maybe sponsorship or under declared gate receipts?) or simply failed in their basic VAT compliance issues.

I would be very surprised if the filing of VAT returns (and latterly MTD) was not undertaken by 3rd party accountants based on figures provided by the company.

Assuming that to be the case, and given the length of time that the company has been trading, it really is stretching one's imagination to believe that the validation tests the accountants would carry out (turnover reconciliations/cash controls etc) together with HMRC own algorithms would not have exposed serial under-declarations long before now.

But maybe THJ is privy to something we don't know?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, arnieg said:

There's no 'may or may not' about it, they definitely don't. Presumably you are alleging they did not account for VAT on a material part of their income (maybe sponsorship or under declared gate receipts?) or simply failed in their basic VAT compliance issues.

Think you will find I said the same in an earlier post; the point I was making is that the issue will be way over a couple of hundred programmes included as a VAT offset against the VAT due that goes on the gate entry money alone. Again I would suggest you are correct in your assumption that they "simply failed in their basic VAT compliance issues" or possibly wilfully ignored them. You have been on that side of the fence; can ignorance be used as a defence?

8 hours ago, Aceslider said:

I would be very surprised if the filing of VAT returns (and latterly MTD) was not undertaken by 3rd party accountants based on figures provided by the company.

Assuming that to be the case, and given the length of time that the company has been trading, it really is stretching one's imagination to believe that the validation tests the accountants would carry out (turnover reconciliations/cash controls etc) together with HMRC own algorithms would not have exposed serial under-declarations long before now.

But maybe THJ is privy to something we don't know?

THJ  privy to something we don't know? not really...

Having been in business some years now it is the business that is responsible for its VAT accounting and not the Accountant; or it is in the case where the turnover is at a manageable level. You enter your inputs and outputs onto the HMRC web site and you are told what your VAT liability is quarterly. Now unless you are a large company who can afford an FD or payroll department; or you are making the profits to out-source this function to say "an Accountant" you normally as a business do this function yourself. 

"Tax has changed" or at least that's what the tax man tells you on his web site and you want to see what changes they are proposing for the payment of VAT going forward especially in the game I am in where we as a company will be responsible for paying the VAT charged by sub contractors direct to the VAT man rather than to the Subbie for him to pay and it will be down to the Sub-Contactor to clam back any credits; off-sets or rebates...

Its a pain in the neck but as the saying goes "in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes" which is a rather poignant quote for today as America votes for a new president.

Regards
THJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy