Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Split Waterman RIP


Guest

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, gustix said:

That is an idea lucifer sam. But I think an item on a forum would also be rejected by Wikipedia.

The Defunct Speedway website is not a forum. I can see why comments on a forum would be rejected, but would they do that to a standard website? Would Wikipedia staff go through every website to check for its authenticity and legitimacy?

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/10/2019 at 6:08 PM, lucifer sam said:

Gustix, any chance you could please arrange to add something to the Harringay page of the Defunct Speedway page (the track he was most synonymous with), which could then be used as a reference?

 

17 hours ago, gustix said:

That is an idea lucifer sam. But I think an item on a forum would also be rejected by Wikipedia. The best idea as mentioned previously in this thread is to wait for the sad news to appear in 'Speedway Star' then pass the item on to Wikipedia for the update.

My apologies lucifer sam for describing a website as a forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a postscript to the debate about citing a reference to the date of Split''s death, I have just looked up a number of other deceased speedway riders on Wikipedia. Although all of them give the date of death, not one of them has a citation.

Edited by norbold
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PotteringAround said:

Seeme to be one person calling himself "michig" on Wikipedia who keeps deleting stuff every time someone adds the news of Split Waterman's death.

I see Norbold and others have updated the news several times.   Each time it's the same idiot who undoes it.

Is there some way this guy michig and his actions can be queried with Wikipedia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, norbold said:

As far as I understand michig is one of the site's administrators.

Yes and it looks like they want to discuss any edits rather than people just doing them. As it mentions, this is a bit ott, but better to talk than just going round in circles 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been previously mentioned the answer is for a BSF member to photocopy the report of the sad death of Split Waterman that will appear in this week's edition of 'Speedway Star'. Then forward that to Wikipedia with a note also detailing the sad loss of Split.

Unfortunately I cannot do this - I do not get 'Speedway Star' nor have a scanner to copy the news item.

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Wikipedia is designed for people to add their own entries and to add their own updates. Obviously, they do have to watch for questionable content, but this straightforward factual information. Again, many of us have updated the site on a number of occasions with no problems whatsoever, but this seems totally ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gustix said:

As has been previously mentioned the answer is for a BSF member to photocopy the report of the sad death of Split Waterman that will appear in this week's edition of 'Speedway Star'. Then forward that to Wikipedia with a note also detailing the sad loss of Split.

Unfortunately I cannot do this - I do not get 'Speedway Star' nor have a scanner to copy the news item.

You don't have to scan in anything and send it to them, you just need to cite the date of the Speedway Star it appears in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, chunky said:

This doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Wikipedia is designed for people to add their own entries and to add their own updates. Obviously, they do have to watch for questionable content, but this straightforward factual information. Again, many of us have updated the site on a number of occasions with no problems whatsoever, but this seems totally ridiculous.

In that case you could inform Wikipedia of the erroneous assertion that California (nr. Wokingham) is a village, it might help to cheer up your pal the doctor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, JOS50 said:

In that case you could inform Wikipedia of the erroneous assertion that California (nr. Wokingham) is a village, it might help to cheer up your pal the doctor.

Perhaps you need to understand what wikipedia and parishes are before you make "clever" comments fella. 

You've been made to look foolish on the other thread, maybe keep your head down unless you know what you're talking about eh.

#headway

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JOS50 said:

In that case you could inform Wikipedia of the erroneous assertion that California (nr. Wokingham) is a village, it might help to cheer up your pal the doctor.

That is not my responsibility, and if we can't get Split Waterman's passing on there, what makes you think we could get anything else changed?  Have you ever considered that YOU may be wrong, and that this particular entry in Wikipedia may be inaccurate?

I don't just assume that everything I read is correct (particularly if there is a question about it), so I will conduct my own research.  I have always been under the impression that California (or California-in-England was not an actual place name, more a term applied to a certain area.  I didn't actually know the history of the place until now, and so far, what I have found seems to agree with what The Doctor has said.  The ONLY reference to California as a village is that single entry on wikipedia, which was submitted by an individual claiming supposed knowledge of the subject.  We all know that due to the origins of the information on there, it is not 100% accurate.

Steering away from wikipedia, a couple of the main resources I checked were detailed (and, it would seem, pretty accurate) gazetteer of towns and villages in Berkshire, and one of towns and parishes in Berkshire.  There is no reference to it as a village, hamlet, parish, or any other locale with the actual name of California.  All reference to "California: or "California-in-England" concerns the park.

More to the point, if California WAS a true village or hamlet, then I am pretty sure it would appear on a map of the area.   I have yet to find a map on which it is shown, other than in reference to the park.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, gustix said:

There is already a thread debating California. It's title is California name debate

Really? I had no idea! I do apologize most sincerely...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, gustix said:

Please!!!! Can we just debate Split Waterman on this thread? There is already a thread debating California. It's title is California name debate

 

1 hour ago, chunky said:

Really? I had no idea! I do apologize most sincerely...

This thread title is Split Waterman RIP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy