Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Ipswich 2020


Recommended Posts

  On 2/4/2021 at 12:02 PM, slyfox said:

Think he may also be a rising star as on the list I have seen he is classed as a 4*

Expand  

Can only be 1 rising star per team so presumably Anders will be at 6 and Drew at 7, therefore making Anders NOT the rising star, even though he is on the rising star list :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Ipswich it's not unusual to give a couple of young Brits ago - whilst for some others they have always seemed to see it as an inconvenience.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How come Jason Crump's average has gone from 8.21 last week to 8.00 this week? Conveniently to drop Ipswich JUST under the average limit?

1. Jason Crump 8.00

2. Jordan Stewart 4.00

3. Danny King 6.66

4. Cameron Heeps 6.30

5. Nicolai Klindt 7.43

6. Anders Rowe 3.00

7. Drew Kemp (3*)

Total: 35.39

Edited by Dandelion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/4/2021 at 12:15 PM, Dandelion said:

How come Jason Crump's average has gone from 8.21 last week to 8.00 this week? Conveniently to drop Ipswich JUST under the average limit?

1. Jason Crump 8.00

2. Jordan Stewart 4.00

3. Danny King 6.66

4. Cameron Heeps 6.30

5. Nicolai Klindt 7.43

6. Anders Rowe 3.00

7. Drew Kemp (3*)

Total: 35.39

Expand  

For the good of speedway 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/4/2021 at 12:03 PM, Dandelion said:

Can only be 1 rising star per team so presumably Anders will be at 6 and Drew at 7, therefore making Anders NOT the rising star, even though he is on the rising star list :blink:

Expand  

You can theoretically have 7 riders on the Rising Star List. Some CL teams have 2 or 3.

The crucial bit is that you have to have one at No 7 in 2021 and two at 6 and 7 in 2022.

They have to start at 7 but if their actual average increases they move up and down the team

You have to signify one as your Rising Star at start of season that's all.

Ipswich have no doubt decided that tactically Kemp is at this stage a better rider to have at No 7 than Rowe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/4/2021 at 1:01 PM, Spl77 said:

For the good of speedway 

Expand  

So do all teams get to choose a rider to reduce average 'for the good of speedway'? Seems a bit unfair

  On 2/4/2021 at 12:39 PM, Richard Weston said:

He could be a rising star in Championship

Expand  

Yes he could, but won't be at Redcar, although I'm lead to believe that Anders is a 4* so maybe he couldn't?

  On 2/4/2021 at 1:03 PM, Baldyman said:

After a certain amount of years away, 

Expand  

But he was 8.21 for 2020 and now 8.00 for 2021, everyone should therefore get a decrease for the extra year away?

  On 2/4/2021 at 1:11 PM, HGould said:

You can theoretically have 7 riders on the Rising Star List. Some CL teams have 2 or 3.

The crucial bit is that you have to have one at No 7 in 2021 and two at 6 and 7 in 2022.

They have to start at 7 but if their actual average increases they move up and down the team

You have to signify one as your Rising Star at start of season that's all.

Ipswich have no doubt decided that tactically Kemp is at this stage a better rider to have at No 7 than Rowe. 

Expand  

Yes, I am aware, I was trying to point out to other people that a team can have as many rising stars as they like, the more the better tbh, but one of them has to be at 7 and the other can fit wherever their average dictates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/4/2021 at 1:17 PM, Dandelion said:

But he was 8.21 for 2020 and now 8.00 for 2021, everyone should therefore get a decrease for the extra year away?

Expand  

A rider that hasn't ridden for a period of time (not just 1 year away) gets their average reassessed. So in Crump's case he was reassessed at 8.21 for having many years away for the 2020 season. As its been an extra year away his average now gets another reduction.  

Paul Hurrys average for the 2020 season would have been more than for 2021, Bjarne Pedersen the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/4/2021 at 1:45 PM, 2ndbendbeerhut said:

A rider that hasn't ridden for a period of time (not just 1 year away) gets their average reassessed. So in Crump's case he was reassessed at 8.21 for having many years away for the 2020 season. As its been an extra year away his average now gets another reduction.  

Paul Hurrys average for the 2020 season would have been more than for 2021, Bjarne Pedersen the same. 

Expand  

You are conflating two separate rules. BP and Crump have both been away long enough to get reassessed, but don't qualify for an additional reduction for missing a year. Most obviously Crump rode in the British Final last year and Bjarne has ridden every season since he left Poole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/4/2021 at 2:11 PM, arnieg said:

You are conflating two separate rules. BP and Crump have both been away long enough to get reassessed, but don't qualify for an additional reduction for missing a year. Most obviously Crump rode in the British Final last year and Bjarne has ridden every season since he left Poole.

Expand  

Both have not ridden in a British league for a number of seasons.

Crump's 8.21 ave was given for not competing since 2009, (10 years away) so a further reduction was given as he has now missed 11 years. 

Pedersen on the other hand has just not ridden in the UK, so his 2021 starting ave could actually be reassessed to a higher or lower figure. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/4/2021 at 2:23 PM, 2ndbendbeerhut said:

Both have not ridden in a British league for a number of seasons.

Crump's 8.21 ave was given for not competing since 2009, (10 years away) so a further reduction was given as he has now missed 11 years. 

Pedersen on the other hand has just not ridden in the UK, so his 2021 starting ave could actually be reassessed to a higher or lower figure. 

Expand  

Repeating your erroneous statement doesn't make it any less wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy