Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Poole 2020


DC2

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, HGould said:

According to the Speedway Star the week after PL + CL were cancelled for the season very few committed to actually trying to run something if possible

Belle Vue, Kings Lynn, Ipswich; Berwick; Eastbourne ; Leicester; Redcar, Scunthorpe, Mildenhall; Plymouth indicated they would not rule out Meetings and of those, Belle Vue; Kings Lynn; Eastbourne; Leicester; Scunthorpe, Plymouth seemed most keen.  

Scunthorpe, Redcar and Lydd have already run amateur meetings. Hopefully Scunny have shown what can be done. I feel more at risk in a supermarket than i did last Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, orion said:

You said that Ford knew  that putting the points limit up would mean clubs going under and only meaning 3 clubs could battle for the title and no one wants that and he could  see  the bigger picture  .. so not not my words at all,

You’ve done it again. “The bigger picture” is your expression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, orion said:

How could  they make sure of making the play offs ? they only just got into them from being bottom of the league . it made plenty of sense for Pawlicki to be at reserve rather than .  Sweetman .

as has been said no unban myths or conspiracy stories at. all  the rules brought it was just anti cov and  everyone could see that and the text messages that were sent just confirmed to me what was crystal clear .

 

It was in the sense that when Coventry were down at the bottom it would have given them more chance to make the plays offs with Pawlicki riding, instead of being in Poland.

Do try to concentrate. I am putting forward the argument that it was not deliberate rule manipulation by Coventry, you now seem to be saying it was. To be clear, are saying Coventry manipulated the rules or not ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, E I Addio said:

It was in the sense that when Coventry were down at the bottom it would have given them more chance to make the plays offs with Pawlicki riding, instead of being in Poland.

Do try to concentrate. I am putting forward the argument that it was not deliberate rule manipulation by Coventry, you now seem to be saying it was. To be clear, are saying Coventry manipulated the rules or not ? 

If you can keep winning with or without Pawlicki and make the play offs with  him at reserve then its a perfect storm . little point in making plays off if you cant win them . Did Cov break any rules ? no 

Edited by orion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, E I Addio said:

You’ve done it again. “The bigger picture” is your expression.

You made out in your own words that Ford was making rules that for the future of the sport  rather than for his own club .. so yes the big picture 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, orion said:

You made out in your own words that Ford was making rules that for the future of the sport  rather than for his own club .. so yes the big picture 

Read my words again.  I said driving clubs out of business wasn’t going to be good for the sport , I didn’t say Ford was making all rules for the future of the sport rather than his own club.  If you are going to quote someone quote them verbatim instead of your own  interpretation of it . You do this all the time as a distraction when we get down to questions you dont want to answer,.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, E I Addio said:

Read my words again.  I said driving clubs out of business wasn’t going to be good for the sport , I didn’t say Ford was making all rules for the future of the sport rather than his own club.  If you are going to quote someone quote them verbatim instead of your own  interpretation of it . You do this all the time as a distraction when we get down to questions you dont want to answer,.

My interpretation was spot on  . What are these questions on this subject for example  i have not answered by the way ? looking forward hearing them but i expect we might have one these distraction posts you are so fond of .

Never known someone get so upset and narky as you do ,, take your own advice its a only speedway forum not life and death 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not Ford's biggest fan and certainly don't agree with some of the suspect antics he's carried out over the years, BUT he's now doing everything he can to save Poole Speedway.  So no matter who you are or what you think give the guy some credit.

Losing our beloved team would be a huge loss, not only to me personally but to UK speedway.  We've lost enough teams in recent years for goodness sake!!

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, chris4gillian said:

I'm not Ford's biggest fan and certainly don't agree with some of the suspect antics he's carried out over the years, BUT he's now doing everything he can to save Poole Speedway.  So no matter who you are or what you think give the guy some credit.

Losing our beloved team would be a huge loss, not only to me personally but to UK speedway.  We've lost enough teams in recent years for goodness sake!!

Personally i honestly think he has a hard task ahead of him .and that is last thing we want to see is our team disappear. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, orion said:

My interpretation was spot on  . What are these questions on this subject for example  i have not answered by the way ? looking forward hearing them but i expect we might have one these distraction posts you are so fond of .

Never known someone get so upset and narky as you do ,, take your own advice its a only speedway forum not life and death 

 

No not al all narky , just having a bit of forum fun trying to get you to back up your claims, instead of twisting everything that is said. For example  I asked whether you n thought Coventry manipulated the rules   and you replied that they didnt break them which obviously not the same thing as manipulating  them. 

Anyway Cityrebel who I like and Phillip Rising are saying its all in the past now so we wont bore them any more and move on. Not important after 10 yearsB)

Edited by E I Addio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all very well saying it's all in the past but that's exactly what someone will form their present opinions from

If you feel severely wronged by someone or a situation even if it was 10 years ago then it's no surprise if you have a little safrican american when you see something going awry with the perceived perpetrator 

Edit (its seems to    s n i g g e r    is no long allowed :rolleyes:)

Edited by dontforgetthefueltapsbruv
Ridiculous auto correct
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speedway as a 'professional' sport has produced so many farces over years, it would make a great soap opera. Having no team to support helps me deal with this. I've had plenty of disappointments with the sport, i am now battle hardened to it. I still enjoy the racing and the social side of it, Scunthorpe on Sunday was a perfect example of this. Speedway isn't worth taking too seriously.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Reading the thread it's like a de ja vu unfolding.

You feel you have read all these words before.

The situation unfolds in an inevitable manner has it has done regarding other clubs that have ceased to exist, despite each clubs 'certainty', it won't happen this time around.

Let's hope it doesn't happen this time around

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, noaksey said:

The good thing is that Ford will work very hard to try and ensure the Pirates survive otherwise any hope that one day he can sell them (might be a long shot anyway these days) will be gone 

When you take on Clarke Osbourne it tends to end up one way .. cant be long before you hear talk of another staduim as they build houses on this one 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10 August 2020 at 4:44 PM, Dave Jones said:

I think EIA needs a reminder of what was going on around that time.Ford was unhappy that Coventry had managed to keep Shamek at reserve for so long, IMO they used the very same criteria that Ford himself used many times (ie they played Ford at his own game)and he didn't like it .Pawlicki's 16 +1  did for Poole on the second leg meeting and Ford reacted by taking in his firework display, turning off the hot water to the visitors shower room & removing the Champagne from the bar area. Hardly the reaction  expected from a mature person.

Then came the sudden rapidly arranged meeting by a select few who connived a change in the conversion factor for lower league riders moving up, effectively screwing up bees deals for two riders already in place. I've seen comments that the teams shouldn't be selected before the AGM but we all know that it was the accepted way of doing things for years ,and probably stilll is now. We also had the re assessment of Pawlicki's average, another very unfair decision. 

Despite all the protests to the contrary it seems blatantly obvious that Ford was the Prime Mover in all that went on in the winter of discontent, & to add insult to injury he then proceded to register Kildemand as a poole rider whilst the bees were in the middle of a team shuffle mid season 2011. Kildemand went public and stated that he had no knowledge of his transfer to Poole as he hadn't even spoken to Ford. But it did have the desired effect as it stopped Coventry using him again.Those are just some of the moves of a very underhanded & bitter man.

Wasn't Ford also having an affair with the admin lady at the BSPA at the time as well?

I recall a new account was set up on the forum which spilled all the beans over the episode but was quickly removed by the moderators as it didn't paint Ford or the sport in a good light. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Chris said:

Wasn't Ford also having an affair with the admin lady at the BSPA at the time as well?

I recall a new account was set up on the forum which spilled all the beans over the episode but was quickly removed by the moderators as it didn't paint Ford or the sport in a good light. 

No.

There was a rumour involving two speedway administrators, but Ford was not one of them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Chris said:

Wasn't Ford also having an affair with the admin lady at the BSPA at the time as well?

I recall a new account was set up on the forum which spilled all the beans over the episode but was quickly removed by the moderators as it didn't paint Ford or the sport in a good light. 

Another 'Trumped up'  and false allegation!!!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy