Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Peterborough Panthers 2020


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wealdstone said:

Don't believe they deliberately do it , but seemingly are not concerned if they do.

When they issue a statement that says:

"We respect the fact that the above hasn’t been caused by everyone issued with a blue badge, and we do also know and understand this decision affects everyone that will attend our race meetings that are issued with a blue badge."

That was a conscious decision which would to p*ss people off without seemingly trying a softer solution first. Is that jumping to a conclusion? Not based on the reasons given.

Edited by Crump99
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Crump99 said:

When they issue a statement that says:

"We respect the fact that the above hasn’t been caused by everyone issued with a blue badge, and we do also know and understand this decision affects everyone that will attend our race meetings that are issued with a blue badge."

That was a conscious decision which would to p*ss people off without seemingly trying a softer solution first. Is that jumping to a conclusion? Not based the reasons given.

My point being that did they do it because they thought it would p*ss people off and got a kick out of that or knew it would alienate some people but felt it was a decision they needed to make, rightly or wrongly. Maybe I’m being naive but I find it hard to believe they would purposely set out to do this just for kicks....always more to everything than meets the eye. A shame they weren’t questioned on this in person at the recent event over the weekend unless somebody here did bring it up with them? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sully said:

My point being that did they do it because they thought it would p*ss people off and got a kick out of that or knew it would alienate some people but felt it was a decision they needed to make, rightly or wrongly. Maybe I’m being naive but I find it hard to believe they would purposely set out to do this just for kicks....always more to everything than meets the eye. A shame they weren’t questioned on this in person at the recent event over the weekend unless somebody here did bring it up with them? 

They didn't need to make it based on what we've been told so there is no rightly, but I agree that there is usually more to it than meets the eye. However, what does meet the eye is an inability to organise and retribution on those who took the p*ss or were abusive to staff at the expense of alienating their disabled customers who played ball and were not abusive, which I suspect was the majority. I don't think anyone in management did it for kicks but did do it out of ignorance, treating it as any other car parking problem. Neil Watson gave you their response to any questions.

Edited by Crump99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, semion said:

What are people suggesting on here about Johnson?

 

That your username is appropriate it seems :P;):o

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy