geoff100 Posted September 15, 2019 Report Share Posted September 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Diamondlil said: His fans will more than likely have a collection for him Which he will donate to vissing and kennett. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hackett Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 COMEDY GENIUS !!!! FARCICAL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces51 Posted September 26, 2019 Report Share Posted September 26, 2019 Nobody on here knows the grounds of appeal, nobody knows the evidence that was adduced and yet lots of people feel qualified to express opinions about the result. Ignorance is never a good foundation on which to base an opinion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IainB Posted September 26, 2019 Report Share Posted September 26, 2019 23 minutes ago, Aces51 said: Nobody on here knows the grounds of appeal, nobody knows the evidence that was adduced and yet lots of people feel qualified to express opinions about the result. Ignorance is never a good foundation on which to base an opinion. He was still found guilty... it was only the punishment that was changed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces51 Posted September 26, 2019 Report Share Posted September 26, 2019 15 minutes ago, iainb said: He was still found guilty... it was only the punishment that was changed I think we all realise that but many of the comments and certainly those to which I was referring, relate to that change in the sentence. Many claim it to be an unjustified change but have no idea of the arguments, mitigation or evidence that were put forward to the tribunal. That makes it impossible for any of us to make an informed judgement on whether the reduced sentence is appropriate. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
False dawn Posted September 26, 2019 Report Share Posted September 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Aces51 said: Nobody on here knows the grounds of appeal, nobody knows the evidence that was adduced Perhaps a bit more transparency would avoid wild speculation. It always better to tell the truth rather than people making up something worse. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Skid Posted September 26, 2019 Report Share Posted September 26, 2019 He certainly leads a charmed life, must have friends in high places. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyretrax Posted September 26, 2019 Report Share Posted September 26, 2019 16 minutes ago, Lord Skid said: He certainly leads a charmed life, must have friends in high places. Just a good lawyer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Skid Posted September 26, 2019 Report Share Posted September 26, 2019 Must of had him quite a while then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
proud panther Posted September 26, 2019 Report Share Posted September 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Lord Skid said: He certainly leads a charmed life, must have friends in high places. Buster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waytogo28 Posted September 28, 2019 Report Share Posted September 28, 2019 On 9/26/2019 at 9:25 PM, proud panther said: Buster Cook is not enough of a Yes Buster, No Buster, Three Bags Full Buster - kind of man to counter Buster as his friend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
proud panther Posted September 28, 2019 Report Share Posted September 28, 2019 2 hours ago, waytogo28 said: Cook is not enough of a Yes Buster, No Buster, Three Bags Full Buster - kind of man to counter Buster as his friend. It helped Kings Lynn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uk_martin Posted September 29, 2019 Report Share Posted September 29, 2019 On 9/26/2019 at 6:23 PM, False dawn said: Perhaps a bit more transparency would avoid wild speculation. It always better to tell the truth rather than people making up something worse. Compare and contrast this to the verdict from the Rugby World Cup citing committee, over the Piers Francis high tackle. https://www.englandrugby.com/news/article/disciplinary-francis-cleared-to-play?fbclid=IwAR3sXcQsmrdiK-VIx_m7mWWPla7G7PSEOJbFcrreIiD49pe5Y9PDDHwnf-Q Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woofers Posted October 1, 2019 Report Share Posted October 1, 2019 On 9/29/2019 at 3:04 PM, uk_martin said: Compare and contrast this to the verdict from the Rugby World Cup citing committee, over the Piers Francis high tackle. https://www.englandrugby.com/news/article/disciplinary-francis-cleared-to-play?fbclid=IwAR3sXcQsmrdiK-VIx_m7mWWPla7G7PSEOJbFcrreIiD49pe5Y9PDDHwnf-Q One is a successful and professionally run organisation that understands and respects it’s players, sponsors and supporters.......the other seems to be the complete opposite, and doesn’t appear to care what anyone thinks either. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.