speedwaysliders Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 Where was this appeal held,and who are the people behind SCB who were on the panel.?My guess is the the appeal was held down the pub,with the fine for cook being just keep the beers coming until he got the lot pissed,and the statement was all the could muster up because they were so drunk!!! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screm Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 5 hours ago, speedwaysliders said: Where was this appeal held,and who are the people behind SCB who were on the panel.?My guess is the the appeal was held down the pub,with the fine for cook being just keep the beers coming until he got the lot pissed,and the statement was all the could muster up because they were so drunk!!! Exclusive photo of the appeal being heard. 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adonis Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 justice in speedway . depends on who you know, and more importantly who you are riding for at the time of any incident . 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityrebel Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 8 minutes ago, adonis said: justice in speedway . depends on who you know, and more importantly who you are riding for at the time of any incident . Too bloody right it does! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
False dawn Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 19 hours ago, Star Lady said: However unless or until the SCB in it's infinite wisdom *cough cough* choose to elaborate on why they made the decision they did, we have to accept it. That's the civilised way the British have always done, we respect the decision of "courts" of law which is why I said they should give the reasons for their judgement. It's that or total anarchy. I accept your premise that we should all respect the rule of law. However, the sense of many posts on here suggest that the authorities can only rule by consent. It is beholding on any ruling body, be it the law courts or the SCB, to be transparent in their rulings. We have the right to hold up their pronouncements to scrutiny and seek some justification for their rulings. Otherwise the authorities leave themselves open to accusations of inconsistency, incompetence or bias. In the current case, the only exception to such transparency can only be out of respect for the medical condition of the rider concerned. However, that seems strange since the said rider continues to compete and is clearly, in the eyes of the authorities, well enough not to be danger to himself or others. Please listen, Mr or Mrs SCB. By taking this high handed attitude to your constituents, you invite guesswork. And we all know where that ends up. Tell us the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uk_martin Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 On 9/12/2019 at 5:15 PM, tyretrax said: Vissing's appeal was rejected, Kennett didn't appeal. Neither of them ride for a team owned by the chaiirman of the BSPA though, do they? That's the difference. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alang Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 1 hour ago, False dawn said: I accept your premise that we should all respect the rule of law. However, the sense of many posts on here suggest that the authorities can only rule by consent. It is beholding on any ruling body, be it the law courts or the SCB, to be transparent in their rulings. We have the right to hold up their pronouncements to scrutiny and seek some justification for their rulings. Otherwise the authorities leave themselves open to accusations of inconsistency, incompetence or bias. In the current case, the only exception to such transparency can only be out of respect for the medical condition of the rider concerned. However, that seems strange since the said rider continues to compete and is clearly, in the eyes of the authorities, well enough not to be danger to himself or others. Please listen, Mr or Mrs SCB. By taking this high handed attitude to your constituents, you invite guesswork. And we all know where that ends up. Tell us the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Lady Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, False dawn said: I accept your premise that we should all respect the rule of law. However, the sense of many posts on here suggest that the authorities can only rule by consent. It is beholding on any ruling body, be it the law courts or the SCB, to be transparent in their rulings. We have the right to hold up their pronouncements to scrutiny and seek some justification for their rulings. Otherwise the authorities leave themselves open to accusations of inconsistency, incompetence or bias. Totally agree with all of that, especially the second sentence. As it is various people are being accused of bias, undue influence and worse and the mental health of an individual is being the subject of distasteful discussion by people who don't know the facts of it. Totally unsatisfactory and simply not necessary. Edited September 14, 2019 by Star Lady 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 The ACU make even the BSPA seem like a modern, forward thinking and efficient organisation! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adonis Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 6 hours ago, Vince said: The ACU make even the BSPA seem like a modern, forward thinking and efficient organisation! I think that is largely the same with all national governing bodies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamish McRaker Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 3 hours ago, adonis said: I think that is largely the same with all national governing bodies Hey, leave the Tory party out of this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioness Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 Care to elaborate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioness Posted September 14, 2019 Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 17 minutes ago, Richard Weston said: Disturbing conversations floating around Arlington tonight over this. Care to elaborate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Lioness Posted September 14, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted September 14, 2019 40 minutes ago, Richard Weston said: Sadly no. So why mention it if you can’t back it up? 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyretrax Posted September 15, 2019 Report Share Posted September 15, 2019 23 minutes ago, Lioness said: So why mention it if you can’t back it up? Because he's got a big spoon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Posted September 15, 2019 Report Share Posted September 15, 2019 11 hours ago, adonis said: I think that is largely the same with all national governing bodies I think the MCF are good and the AMCA and YMSA a lot better than the ACU. That's the only ones I have experience of and as far as the ACU goes it's near enough all bad! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screm Posted September 15, 2019 Report Share Posted September 15, 2019 One wonders if it will be Craig Cook himself that pays for his fine. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trees Posted September 15, 2019 Report Share Posted September 15, 2019 9 hours ago, Richard Weston said: Sadly no. Then don't bloody say anything if you're not gonna back it up 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adonis Posted September 15, 2019 Report Share Posted September 15, 2019 26 minutes ago, screm said: One wonders if it will be Craig Cook himself that pays for his fine. Well , I have heard he found a peter rabbit 50 pence in his change , worth about £4 .he's going to pay with that !! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamondlil Posted September 15, 2019 Report Share Posted September 15, 2019 5 hours ago, adonis said: Well , I have heard he found a peter rabbit 50 pence in his change , worth about £4 .he's going to pay with that !! His fans will more than likely have a collection for him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.