SharpenRake Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Richard Weston said: Never pushed at anyone, however annoyed I might be. Best to ignore such provocation is my attitude. Very admirable and I'm sure you would therefore agree that the actions of the Eastbourne staff riders hangers on were totally out of order following the Cook/marshall incident? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamish McRaker Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 2 hours ago, Richard Weston said: Whether it was a headbutt, or not: you cannot escape the fact that Cook attacked a track marshal, rode through the pits, which he (or anyone else) is not allowed to do, and ignored red lights/flags. Cook, if he thought he was provoked, needed to act in a professional way. He didn't. Looked to me like Cook tried to shove the steward with his beer gut but made a poor job of it because he hasn't got one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharpenRake Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 3 minutes ago, False dawn said: So the referee passed the track as ready to race. So he should have come down hard on any further (unofficial) actions being taken by club or rider. He would have been aware of the ill feeling and should have advised the Glasgow management that he was not having any of it. What actions were taken by the club/rider? In Glasgow's case 3 riders mistakenly (I assume they were advised of the procedures - they are totally different from Glasgow's) rode off before they should have. Red lights (allegedly) are put on, riders have 2 options, go back to an area that is apparently teeming with children, staff etc etc or ride around away from the 'danger area' to the pits. The 3 riders are clearly travelling slowly and headed towards a pit gate when the marshall becomes involved. The marshall having created the problem then walks away and lets other Eastbourne people including Eastbourne riders create a riot. How were the Glasgow management meant to stop a riot? Was Michael Max expected to walk up to the Eastbourne staff/ riders and say 'look could you stop this please, this sort of thing isn't very nice?' 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac101 Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 Take it Kennett and Newman were also annoyed that the riders left the parade early and chased cookie after he set off because they were there throwing punches quicker than the security lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HGould Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 28 minutes ago, SharpenRake said: What actions were taken by the club/rider? In Glasgow's case 3 riders mistakenly (I assume they were advised of the procedures - they are totally different from Glasgow's) rode off before they should have. Red lights (allegedly) are put on, riders have 2 options, go back to an area that is apparently teeming with children, staff etc etc or ride around away from the 'danger area' to the pits. The 3 riders are clearly travelling slowly and headed towards a pit gate when the marshall becomes involved. The marshall having created the problem then walks away and lets other Eastbourne people including Eastbourne riders create a riot. How were the Glasgow management meant to stop a riot? Was Michael Max expected to walk up to the Eastbourne staff/ riders and say 'look could you stop this please, this sort of thing isn't very nice?' or may be a lot nearer the truth Cook ignored standard protocol as his head was not right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenga Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, SharpenRake said: Extra work was done which suggests the referee had sympathy for the Glasgow riders concerns i think the ref gave all the glasgow riders a placebo just to shut then up ! Edited August 7, 2019 by jenga Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 How did Kennett and Cook get on at Kings Lynn on Monday? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenga Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 2 hours ago, DC2 said: Kennet was the bigger disgrace. NO he wasnt . and you know who was . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenga Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Pinny said: attempting to head butt someone whilst wearing a hard hat is cowardly, pathetic and absolutely disgraceful regardless of being provoked. not to mention all the body armour ,chest ,legs box and arm/elbow protection they wear it was like knife against a gun , only one winner . good to see kyle not get tangled up in the glasgow ignorance . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenga Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 1 hour ago, mac101 said: Take it Kennett and Newman were also annoyed that the riders left the parade early and chased cookie after he set off because they were there throwing punches quicker than the security lol didnt see any security men throwing punches , did you ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac101 Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 2 hours ago, jenga said: didnt see any security men throwing punches , did you ? No but the Eastbourne riders were before the security could get there to stop them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenga Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 (edited) lets just all rewind for a moment and think who started the on track action , bearing in mind that the home team has the right to make the track to their advantage that is acceptable . hot day , plenty of water or hot day plenty of dust ... worky visited glasgow when rickey wells was number one for us . the track was swimming but glasgow wanted to carry on .this can be seen on the glasgow site and its well into the meeting and swimming . kennets actions were in my eyes in defence of fellow eastbourne staff/riders .. also WHO SWUNG THE FIRST PUNCH . Edited August 7, 2019 by jenga 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 At least young Bickley had the sense not to get involved in the handbags ,although he was one of the riders who appeared to be pushed off early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharpenRake Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, jenga said: lets just all rewind for a moment and think who started the on track action , bearing in mind that the home team has the right to make the track to their advantage that is acceptable . hot day , plenty of water or hot day plenty of dust ... worky visited glasgow when rickey wells was number one for us . the track was swimming but glasgow wanted to carry on .this can be seen on the glasgow site and its well into the meeting and swimming . kennets actions were in my eyes in defence of fellow eastbourne staff/riders .. also WHO SWUNG THE FIRST PUNCH . I'm not sure what you're saying but the thrust seems to be if you are of a non Glasgow persuasion it is OK to react or even over react whether it is justified or not. If you are of a Glasgow persuasion you should just stand back take all the intimidation, verbal abuse, be pushed and shoved, threatened and punched. Wasn't aware that JC rode for us and we all know what happened to him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenga Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 i take it J C is jesus christ ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 It’s just pity that Eastbourne have been to Glasgow on league business, that would have attracted a bit of interest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevec Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 19 minutes ago, Fromafar said: It’s just pity that Eastbourne have been to Glasgow on league business, that would have attracted a bit of interest. Wouldnt it just! Having said that I reckon 99% of Glasgow fans and 99% of Eastbourne fans could happily sit down and watch together with nothing more than some light hearted banter!....Unless it all kicked off, and then i would get the hell out of there! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac101 Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 Remember the day James grieves had to get a police escort out the area many moons ago because of a incident on the track when he rode for wolves lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor... Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 1 hour ago, stevec said: Wouldnt it just! Having said that I reckon 99% of Glasgow fans and 99% of Eastbourne fans could happily sit down and watch together with nothing more than some light hearted banter!....Unless it all kicked off, and then i would get the hell out of there! The glasgow fans there on the night were fine aswell and couldn't believe their eyes like the rest of us. Certainly none of the mouth and bravado that the ones on here are seemingly fond of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharpenRake Posted August 7, 2019 Report Share Posted August 7, 2019 10 minutes ago, The Doctor... said: The glasgow fans there on the night were fine aswell and couldn't believe their eyes like the rest of us. Certainly none of the mouth and bravado that the ones on here are seemingly fond of. I'm glad you think that the Glasgow fans were fine if being glad to get out off the place counts as fine. There comments were posted on a tigers fans page and certainly don't paint a pretty picture. Your last paragraph does not make sense unless you remove 'seemingly'. However whilst it would make grammatical sense it would be factually incorrect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.