Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

1957 Southern Area League


daveallan81

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, daveallan81 said:

13/07 Aldershot 51 Rye 32   Confirmed.

14/07 Rye 52 Aldershot 29   Confirmed.

07/09 Aldershot 60 Rye 23   Aldershot 59 Rye House 23.  Speedway Star and Speedway World both reported 60-23; in Peter Morrish's 'British Speedway Leagues 1946 - 1964' it is shown as 59-23.

08/09 Rye 48 Aldershot 35   Confirmed.

 

 

Edited by BL65
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest compost
57 minutes ago, BL65 said:

 

 

Re Aldershot 60/59 Rye House 23

The Speedway Researcher file for Aldershot has the score as 60-23. 

The listed heat results and rider scorecard both tally 60 for Aldershot.

So any idea as to what happened to the missing Poppies point ?

Edited by compost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, compost said:

 

Re Aldershot 60/59 Rye House 23

The Speedway Researcher file for Aldershot has the score as 60-23. 

The listed heat results and rider scorecard both tally 60 for Aldershot.

So any idea as to what happened to the missing Poppies point ?

Unfortunately not.... yet.  The league tables published in the Speedway Star included the score of 60-23 up until 2nd November, when the final table reflected the amendment to 59-23, but with no explanation given. 

Edited by BL65
Additional information.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good stuff, thank you.

I spent a while double checking the Researcher files last night and discovered that in the 07/09 report Dave Slater is missing from the individual scorechart. He scores 2 (0, 0, 1, 1). It didn't resolve the extra point issue of course but perhaps it could be a lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest compost
37 minutes ago, daveallan81 said:

Good stuff, thank you.

I spent a while double checking the Researcher files last night and discovered that in the 07/09 report Dave Slater is missing from the individual scorechart. He scores 2 (0, 0, 1, 1). It didn't resolve the extra point issue of course but perhaps it could be a lead.

The Researcher file is definitly wrong in the rider scorecard for this match.  Pratt is listed as having ridden in 4 heats with a total of 4 - 2 and not the 3 - 1 given on the card (his and Slaters missing points give the Roosters their tally of 23 as expected).

Neither matters as both are Rye riders and it isn't the Rye total that appears wrong.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, compost said:

The Researcher file is definitly wrong in the rider scorecard for this match.  Pratt is listed as having ridden in 4 heats with a total of 4 - 2 and not the 3 - 1 given on the card (his and Slaters missing points give the Roosters their tally of 23 as expected).

Neither matters as both are Rye riders and it isn't the Rye total that appears wrong.

 

I was about to mention that the riders' totals in the close season SAL track reviews in the Star differ regarding several riders compared to the figures in the 1946-1964 book, with a missing point for Colin Pratt in the Star being one of them.  Also, it is quite possible that the reports/scores in the Star and World were from the same source; the Researcher information may have been obtained from a marked programme, which compounds the 60 point mystery, unless the programme was filled in by the Star reporter!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are CSI: Aldershot when you need them?

I forgot to mention the Colin Pratt "error" (a word I'm reluctant to use because I fully appreciate the difficulty in ascertaining the facts from back in the day).

All I can add at this point is the 59-23 result tallies with the S.A.L. table on the SGB website, which will do nicely for my purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, norbold said:

Just as a sideline on this, I checked through the Rye House results for 1957. Out of the ten SAL fixtures they raced, only one resulted in a score that added up to 84!

In 3 of the 5 Rye House challenge matches that season there was also a 'missing' point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy