Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

1957 Southern Area League


daveallan81

Recommended Posts

  On 6/25/2019 at 12:19 AM, daveallan81 said:

13/07 Aldershot 51 Rye 32   Confirmed.

14/07 Rye 52 Aldershot 29   Confirmed.

07/09 Aldershot 60 Rye 23   Aldershot 59 Rye House 23.  Speedway Star and Speedway World both reported 60-23; in Peter Morrish's 'British Speedway Leagues 1946 - 1964' it is shown as 59-23.

08/09 Rye 48 Aldershot 35   Confirmed.

 

Expand  

 

Edited by BL65
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest compost
  On 6/25/2019 at 7:05 AM, BL65 said:

 

Expand  

 

Re Aldershot 60/59 Rye House 23

The Speedway Researcher file for Aldershot has the score as 60-23. 

The listed heat results and rider scorecard both tally 60 for Aldershot.

So any idea as to what happened to the missing Poppies point ?

Edited by compost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/25/2019 at 8:01 AM, compost said:

 

Re Aldershot 60/59 Rye House 23

The Speedway Researcher file for Aldershot has the score as 60-23. 

The listed heat results and rider scorecard both tally 60 for Aldershot.

So any idea as to what happened to the missing Poppies point ?

Expand  

Unfortunately not.... yet.  The league tables published in the Speedway Star included the score of 60-23 up until 2nd November, when the final table reflected the amendment to 59-23, but with no explanation given. 

Edited by BL65
Additional information.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good stuff, thank you.

I spent a while double checking the Researcher files last night and discovered that in the 07/09 report Dave Slater is missing from the individual scorechart. He scores 2 (0, 0, 1, 1). It didn't resolve the extra point issue of course but perhaps it could be a lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest compost
  On 6/25/2019 at 10:17 AM, daveallan81 said:

Good stuff, thank you.

I spent a while double checking the Researcher files last night and discovered that in the 07/09 report Dave Slater is missing from the individual scorechart. He scores 2 (0, 0, 1, 1). It didn't resolve the extra point issue of course but perhaps it could be a lead.

Expand  

The Researcher file is definitly wrong in the rider scorecard for this match.  Pratt is listed as having ridden in 4 heats with a total of 4 - 2 and not the 3 - 1 given on the card (his and Slaters missing points give the Roosters their tally of 23 as expected).

Neither matters as both are Rye riders and it isn't the Rye total that appears wrong.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 6/25/2019 at 11:07 AM, compost said:

The Researcher file is definitly wrong in the rider scorecard for this match.  Pratt is listed as having ridden in 4 heats with a total of 4 - 2 and not the 3 - 1 given on the card (his and Slaters missing points give the Roosters their tally of 23 as expected).

Neither matters as both are Rye riders and it isn't the Rye total that appears wrong.

 

Expand  

I was about to mention that the riders' totals in the close season SAL track reviews in the Star differ regarding several riders compared to the figures in the 1946-1964 book, with a missing point for Colin Pratt in the Star being one of them.  Also, it is quite possible that the reports/scores in the Star and World were from the same source; the Researcher information may have been obtained from a marked programme, which compounds the 60 point mystery, unless the programme was filled in by the Star reporter!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are CSI: Aldershot when you need them?

I forgot to mention the Colin Pratt "error" (a word I'm reluctant to use because I fully appreciate the difficulty in ascertaining the facts from back in the day).

All I can add at this point is the 59-23 result tallies with the S.A.L. table on the SGB website, which will do nicely for my purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy