Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Brandon Update


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, 40-38 said:

You have to admit that some of this evidence really doesn't paint speedway in a good light. Especially the Belle Vue stuff just now.

We all know the sport is on the brink and is on a downward trend, there's a whole forum dedicated to it here. Yes the sport is mismanaged, we all know that too, but a lot of the downturn is also due to tracks beings sold for development

Edited by iainb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the site on Google earth I feel there's room for a Redcar/ Worky site AND some houses. Perhaps if BE were made to build a basic circuit in return for allowing a number of houses it would be a compromise. Whatever happens that big stand will have to come down so what's left would be fairly basic anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ch958 said:

Looking at the site on Google earth I feel there's room for a Redcar/ Worky site AND some houses. Perhaps if BE were made to build a basic circuit in return for allowing a number of houses it would be a compromise. Whatever happens that big stand will have to come down so what's left would be fairly basic anyway.

That not what has been said. The main stand would be boarded up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gambo said:

All this discussion regarding the 3G pitch is a bit puzzling to me.

Aren't BE planning to include one?

Yes - they are justifying the demand and dealing with the stupid comments made by yesterdays expert witness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, iainb said:

Blimey, they're pulling the bloke from yesterday apart again... and he's not even there!

Having watched yesterday in full, he is a very easy target and the BE Barrister should make the most of this on behalf of his client.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Gambo said:

All this discussion regarding the 3G pitch is a bit puzzling to me.

Aren't BE planning to include one?

seems to me that if they want a 3g pitch so badly, just let them build one in the stadium car park... everyone's a winner!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Piotr Pyszny said:

1,200 people using a 3G pitch weekly against 14 riders using a speedway track over the same period.

This is ludicrous. On that basis, we'd be covering, with 3G pitches, every piece of land not in use for residential, commercial or industrial purposes!

That's Sport England for you. They are all about participation  not spectator numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Skidder1 said:

That's Sport England for you. They are all about participation  not spectator numbers.

To be fair they were trying to justify the need spectators yesterday although rather weakly.

At the moment the council seem to have thrown us under the bus, their barrister sat there with what looked like his daughters laptop with childish stickers all over it calls a stuttering bumbling idot as a witness! 

Edited by iainb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eric i said:

I thought alot of the same points/arguments were the same as yesterday.

it's the only argument they've got isn't it really. prove the Stadium isn't viable but a 3g pitch is, this replacing the sporting facility

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why isn't someone pointing out the fact that a 3g pitch will be used by people ( mainly men) in their teens, twenties and maybe thirties?  Brandon Stadium will provide sporting entertainment for families with children of 5 years old and adults up to 95 years old.

Why isn't more being made of the fact that stock car racing is the big money earner at Brandon?  Why do they keep the discussion to Speedway?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 190557 said:

 

Why isn't more being made of the fact that stock car racing is the big money earner at Brandon?  Why do they keep the discussion to Speedway?

You would hope that the SCS barrister will make great play of that. If Mr Edie has not really factored that in (and as far as I could hear, he confirmed that) then the barrister should be able to throw doubt on his whole assessment of Brandon stadium's vialbilty versus a 3g pitch. 

I hope the barrister might also make the point, amongst many others, that the participants in a Premier League football club are far out weighed by the number of supports who attend, and compare that as a parallel to 14 speedway participants in a meeting. 

I would think the SCS barrister will be able to challenge Mr Edie on much of his evidence, especially where it was inaccurate and where he speculated - using the 'who did you speak to to establish this evidence' approach, as the BE barrister did quite extensively

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy